Article Text

Download PDFPDF
International gastroenterology research: subject areas, impact, and funding
  1. G Lewisona,
  2. J Granta,
  3. P Jansenb
  1. aPolicy Unit, the Wellcome Trust, 210 Euston Road, London NW1 2BE, UK, bDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academisch Ziekenhuis Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Postbus 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands
  1. Professor G Lewison, Bibliometrics Research Group, Department of Information Science, City University, Northampton Sq, London EC1V 0HB, UK. g.lewison{at}soi.city.ac.uk

Abstract

AIMS To examine the volume and potential impact of gastroenterology research outputs from 1985 to 1998 from 14 developed countries; the overlap with research in cancer, infectious diseases, and genetics; and the funding sources for this research. To determine if countries' research outputs correlated with their burden of corresponding diseases and inputs to their research.

METHODS Selective retrieval of papers from the Science Citation Index and manual look up of a sample to determine funding sources. Classification of journals by four categories of research level (clinical/basic) and potential impact (low/high).

RESULTS Gastroenterology represents about 8% of world biomedical research but over 11% in Italy, Japan, and Spain. Its potential impact is highest (but declining) for the USA. It has increased noticeably in most European countries, particularly in Finland. Gastroenterology research has become more clinical in Japan, Spain, Australia, and the Netherlands but more basic in Canada, Germany, Finland, Israel, and South Africa. Funding comes primarily from national governments, followed by national private non-profit sources and industry but little industrial funding occurs in some countries. There is a strong and positive correlation between reported deaths from gastrointestinal neoplasms and countries' outputs of research in gastrointestinal oncology.

CONCLUSIONS Bibliometric analysis can reveal differences between countries in their research in a subject when a common methodology is applied to an international database. Variations in research methods in different countries can plausibly explain some of the variation in the potential impact of the work.

  • bibliometrics
  • funding
  • impact
  • mortality
  • research
  • Abbreviations used in this paper

    A
    number of authors per paper
    C0–4
    five year citation count
    CF
    calibration factor
    D
    number of addresses per paper
    F
    number of funders per paper
    GASTR
    gastrointerology (filter)
    GENET
    genetics (filter)
    ICD
    International Classification of Deaths
    INFEC
    infection (filter)
    NFP
    private non-profit
    ONCOL
    oncology (filter)
    PIC
    potential impact category
    RL
    research level (clinical to basic)
    SCI
    Science Citation Index
  • Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

  • Abbreviations used in this paper

    A
    number of authors per paper
    C0–4
    five year citation count
    CF
    calibration factor
    D
    number of addresses per paper
    F
    number of funders per paper
    GASTR
    gastrointerology (filter)
    GENET
    genetics (filter)
    ICD
    International Classification of Deaths
    INFEC
    infection (filter)
    NFP
    private non-profit
    ONCOL
    oncology (filter)
    PIC
    potential impact category
    RL
    research level (clinical to basic)
    SCI
    Science Citation Index
  • View Full Text