We have concerns about the recommendation of naso-gastric feeding in
severe acute pancreatitis. Firstly, the recommendation is based on a
feasibility study of 26 patients published in August 2000 in the
International Journal of Pancreatology.
Secondly, it has been graded as grade B evidence. We therefore feel
that this recommendation is misleading and inappropriate. We feel further
evidence...
We have concerns about the recommendation of naso-gastric feeding in
severe acute pancreatitis. Firstly, the recommendation is based on a
feasibility study of 26 patients published in August 2000 in the
International Journal of Pancreatology.
Secondly, it has been graded as grade B evidence. We therefore feel
that this recommendation is misleading and inappropriate. We feel further
evidence would be required to substantiate this recommendation.
A further concern relates to the recommendation for the enteral route
to be used if tolerated (grade A). We feel that this might be misleading
as all three of the papers used as evidence for this recommendation refers
to naso-jejunal feeding rather than generally referring to 'enteral
feeding'.
We read with interest the article by Nwokolo et al reporting raised
serum ghrelin levels following helicobacter pylori eradication.[1] There
are some exceptions to the interpretation of the data that we would take.
The authors state that the increase in ghrelin levels seen in their
study “lends support to the view that ghrelin could be involved in the
long term regulation of body w...
We read with interest the article by Nwokolo et al reporting raised
serum ghrelin levels following helicobacter pylori eradication.[1] There
are some exceptions to the interpretation of the data that we would take.
The authors state that the increase in ghrelin levels seen in their
study “lends support to the view that ghrelin could be involved in the
long term regulation of body weight”. Whilst there is growing evidence to
support this in the literature,[2-4] this study does not present any such
data and is not methodologically geared towards addressing this question.
The proposal that eradication of H. pylori leads to an increase in ghrelin
levels, which in turn leads to an increase in obesity, is also without
foundation. The only known situation in which hyper-ghrelinaemia is
associated with obesity is in the Prader-Willi syndrome.[5] In all other
studies ghrelin levels correlate inversely with measures of body
adiposity, and are altered in a compensatory manner by changes in body
weight.[6] To suggest therefore that H. pylori eradication leads to a
hyper-ghrelinaemic state that drives increased appetite is not
physiologically feasible, since any transient appetite increase would be
expected to be countered by any increase in adiposity, which in turn would
suppress ghrelin levels.
The authors’ proposal that “children with H. pylori may have
relatively low ghrelin concentrations contributing to growth retardation”
is also without foundation. A recent study has shown H. pylori status to
have no effect on ghrelin levels.[7] The role of ghrelin on the growth of
children remains unclear. Ghrelin is an endogenous ligand to the growth
hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R), and potently stimulates growth
hormone release. It may indeed have a role to play in growth, since in
patients with a genetic GHRH deficiency nocturnal enhancement of GH
secretion remains,[8] an effect that may be mediated by ghrelin.
One other proposal of the authors is that H. pylori eradication
increases 24 hour gastric acidity by a ghrelin dependent mechanism. Whilst
central and peripheral ghrelin administration has been shown to increase
stomach acidity when given to rats,[9] data is lacking in humans. The
small, but statistically significant increase in acidity seen here would
be expected after H. pylori eradication, and is likely to be secondary to
parietal cell recovery following resolution of inflammation. The
suggestion that hypergastrinaemia leads to lower ghrelin levels, and vice
versa, is not supported in the literature.[10]
References
(1) Nwokolo CU, Freshwater DA, O'Hare P, Randeva HS. Plasma ghrelin
following cure of Helicobacter pylori. Gut 2003; 52(5):637-640.
(2) Cummings DE, Weigle DS, Frayo RS, Breen PA, Ma MK, Dellinger EP
et al. Plasma ghrelin levels after diet-induced weight loss or gastric
bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2002; 346(21):1623-1630.
(3) Nakazato M, Murakami N, Date Y, Kojima M, Matsuo H, Kangawa K et al. A role for ghrelin in the central regulation of feeding. Nature 2001;
409(6817):194-198.
(4) Wren AM, Seal LJ, Cohen MA, Brynes AE, Frost GS, Murphy KG et al. Ghrelin enhances appetite and increases food intake in humans. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86(12):5992.
(5) Cummings DE, Clement K, Purnell JQ, Vaisse C, Foster KE, Frayo
RS et al. Elevated plasma ghrelin levels in Prader Willi syndrome. Nat Med
2002; 8(7):643-644.
(6) Hansen TK, Dall R, Hosoda H, Kojima M, Kangawa K, Christiansen
JS et al. Weight loss increases circulating levels of ghrelin in human
obesity. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2002; 56(2):203-206.
(7) Gokcel A, Gumurdulu Y, Kayaselcuk F, Serin E, Ozer B, Ozsahin AK
et al. Helicobacter pylori has no effect on plasma ghrelin levels. Eur J
Endocrinol 2003; 148(4):423-426.
(8) Maheshwari HG, Pezzoli SS, Rahim A, Shalet SM, Thorner MO,
Baumann G. Pulsatile growth hormone secretion persists in genetic growth
hormone-releasing hormone resistance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2002;
282(4):E943-E951.
(9) Masuda Y, Tanaka T, Inomata N, Ohnuma N, Tanaka S, Itoh Z et al.
Ghrelin stimulates gastric acid secretion and motility in rats. Biochem
Biophys Res Commun 2000; 276(3):905-908.
(10) Dornonville dlC, Bjorkqvist M, Sandvik AK, Bakke I, Zhao CM,
Chen D et al. A-like cells in the rat stomach contain ghrelin and do not
operate under gastrin control. Regul Pept 2001; 99(2-3):141-150.
Tamboli et al[1] have initiated the discussion about dysbiosis
that is rather a forgotten term.
Most of the Medical Dictionaries have yet
to define this term. Dysbiosis as described by Metchnikoff (1910),[2] a
colleague of Louis Pasteur, can be explained as the process rendering
abnormal condition of the native gut micro-biota. Circumstances suggest
that dysbiosis preceding the rotavirus...
Tamboli et al[1] have initiated the discussion about dysbiosis
that is rather a forgotten term.
Most of the Medical Dictionaries have yet
to define this term. Dysbiosis as described by Metchnikoff (1910),[2] a
colleague of Louis Pasteur, can be explained as the process rendering
abnormal condition of the native gut micro-biota. Circumstances suggest
that dysbiosis preceding the rotavirus infection in infants and children
determine the severity of disease.
Professor Stig Bengmark, Lund University, Sweden, regards the native gut
microbiota as the non-somatic organ of the body (personal communication).[3]
Could we use a term gut eco-organ for this? The non-pathogenic native (and
autochthonous as explained by Dubos et al.[4] and not the transient/
allochthonous) gut micro-biota can safely be regarded as an eco-organ (or
micro-biota organ). This organ is made up of diverse micro-biota that
follows the rules of open ecosystem. It is not made up of body cells hence
the prefix eco- is used. It produces metabolites useful for the body,
participates in the metabolism of the body, and is a part of body’s immune
system hence the suffix –organ is used. Similarly, introducing the terms
vaginal eco-organ or skin eco-organ would simplify the discussion of
pathogenesis of diseases associated with these.
In human species, the microbial population exceeds by at least 10-
fold the population of human cells in the body. Hence the human animal can
be regarded as the vessel that has evolved to permit the survival and
propagation of microorganisms. Alternatively, the human can be regarded as
a biological organism composed of both eukaryotic animal cells and
eukaryotic and prokaryotic microbial cells.[5] The concept is
supported by the lifetime work of the R. Dubos and R. W. Schaedler from
Rockfeller University, New York, USA; B. Gustafsson and T. Midtvedt from
Karolynska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; T.Mitsuoka, from University of
Tokyo, Japan and P. Raibaud and R. Ducluzeau from Institut National de
Recherches Agronomiques, Jouy-en-Josas, France.[6]
The latter
concept anticipated by Savage has been examined. In simpler words, human
animal has genetic plus somatic plus micro-biotic cells or human is a
macroorganism having micro-biotic cells.
Here is a model given by Bry et al.[7] to show how a bacterium
behaves like an organ of the mammalian physiological system. Bacteroides
thetaiotaomicron was the component of the normal gut microbiota of
conventionally housed experimental NMRI mice. These mice produced
fucosylated glycoconjugates and an alpha1, 2-fucosyltransferase messenger
RNA in the epithelial cells of small intestine. The epithelial cells of
small intestine of germ free NMRI mice lack this fucosylation program. The
fucosylation program was restored in the gnotobiotes produced from the
germ free animals using Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron. When the mice were
modified by transgenesis (insertion of transposon) they lost their ability
to use L-fucose as a carbon source. Gnotobiotes produced using such a
modified mice did not restore the small intestine epithelium fucosylation
program. This indicates that particular bacteria may be suitable for a
particular host.
The intestinal niches are unique.[8] Hence the
autochthonous microorganisms evolved in those niches are also unique. A
microorganism native to one niche may be transient to another.[9] It is felt that isolation of autochthonous microorganisms from
these niches and their cultivation in vitro is difficult by conventional
methods and appropriate environment resembling the niche in the gut is yet
to be created through the application of tissue engineering. The
microorganisms isolated from the gut and propagated in vitro and used as
probiotics, are most likely to be transient microorganisms present in the
gut and does not seem to be true to most of the niches in the intestine.
The terms probiotic, symbiotic or antibiotic are used to denote the
relationship between the life forms. The eco-organ has to be considered as
the part of the body or macroorganism. The body is a single (although
complex) life presentation. If the eco-organ concept is recognized then
the relationship of eco-organ with the body as a whole is a self-dialogue.
The emotional stress cause disturbance in the stable composition of gut
microbiota i.e. gut eco-organ [10-12] and the physical exercise done by the individual may
have impact on the health of the organs including eco-organ. Recognizing
the concept of eco-organ makes the subject understandable as discussed
below.
The body (inclusive of eco-organ) and probiotics can have a dialogue.
These elements either have symbiotic relationship i.e. the probiotics
exert symbiosis on the body by producing metabolites that can be called as
symbiotic (e.g. short chain fatty acids, other fatty acids, amino acids,
peptides, polyamines, carbohydrates, vitamins, numerous antioxidants and
phytosterols, growth factors, coagulation factors, various signal
molecules such as cytokine-like bacteriokines) and the results are
beneficial for the body alone or the probiotic relationship where both the
body and probiotics are benefited mutually by each other by probiosis. The
term symbiotic was coined for the combined action (synergy) of prebiotics
and probiotics and preferably spelled as synbiotics, however it is now
used in the sense as described above.[13] The amino acid residues
like glutamine that are heat labile may be produced in vivo by symbiotic
supplement.
It appears most of the time that the benefits provided by the
probiotics to the body outweigh the benefits provided by the body to the
probiotics. Therefore, the probiotics are not likely to be permanent
residents of the gut. After seeding of probiotics in the gut, they may
adhere to mucus and may or may not proliferate to some extent and reach to
plateau and then decline for the convenience of the autochthonous
microbiota. It is quite possible that some bacteria are evolved for
performing the role of probiotics however; work in this direction is still
not carried out. The body (inclusive of eco-organ), the probiotics and the
pathogenic microorganisms can have a trilogue. Both the body and the
probiotics may exert antibiosis against the pathogenic microorganisms
independently and/or through their interaction.
It would be interesting to observe whether microbiota of probiotics
preparation mutates or adapts to become a member of the body. Bacteria
influence other bacteria either by the release of signal molecules [14] or by the transfer of genetic material between
bacteria.[15] It is known that antibiotic resistant
bacterial species evolve in the gut.[16-18]
Food must nourish the native microbiota for prevention of disease:
Food contains several nutrients that nourish body including eco-
organs. Malnutrition weakens immune system. However, food may also contain
certain functional ingredients. Some of them are discussed.
Fresh fruits and vegetables are source of dietary nitrate. Some of
the dietary nitrates are absorbed and re-secreted in the saliva. The
bacterial enzymes produced in the mouth reduce some of the nitrate to
nitrite. When saliva is swallowed the acidic gastric juice reduces nitrite
to nitric oxide.[19] Human milk is a source of
nitrate [20,21] and nitrate-reducing
microorganisms.[22] A high Concentration of nitrite in the
stomachs of breastfed neonates is suggested to enable a high production of
Nitric Oxide (NO). It is proposed that breast milk is important in
regulating the mucosal blood flow and gastric motility and in achieving
bacteriostasis via induction of NO generation in the neonatal stomach.[21] The nitric oxide is antibacterial and antiviral.[23,24] Whether it has any role in
controlling gastroenteritis due to rotavirus is not known. It appears that
some of the weaning diets might be reducing supply of nitrate. The
severity of acute infectious gastroenteritis could be related to this
supply. Nitric Oxide is also an acute phase reactant. It is also thought
to be mutagenic.[25]
The human milk contains array of protective substances. The anti-
rotavirus effect of lactoferrin [26-28] and lactadherin [29-34] are known. Human milk may also contain
antirotaviral antibodies.[35-44] In addition food is source of prebiotics
and probiotics.
Understanding the dysbiosis with reference to the weaning:
We now understand that dysbiosis in our species could be due to the
abnormal food (drifting away from diets having Palaeolithic pattern), or
anti-metabolites produced by pathogenic microorganisms or by antibiotics
taken as drugs. The dysbiosis is not a unique condition. The dysbiosis
caused by eating high meat low fibre diet may be different than the one
caused due to intake of antibiotics. Similarly, dysbiosis expressed by
flatulence and bloating may be different than dysbiosis expressed by
chronic diarrhoea or dysentery. The dysbiotic body has dysfunctional
immune system.[45,46] Some
of the dysbiotic condition in the gut promotes translocation of gut
microorganisms that may have serious consequences like organ failure.[47,48]
We are living the modern life with a body that is genetically the
same like body of a human in Palaeolithic era. As an adult we may be
adapted to modern foods based mostly on cereal and milk products but the
babies undergoing weaning may be facing such food as a strange one. How
the Palaeolithic children were weaned is difficult to say but certainly
cereal and milk based diets were not available to them. Rotavirus
diarrhoea occurs in neonate animals but in humans it occurs mostly during
weaning indicating the possibility that an animal virus had an opportunity
created by typical dysbiotic condition due to modern weaning foods to
evolve as a human pathogen.
Piglets are used as an animal model for human rotavirus
gastroenteritis. The piglets don’t show susceptibility to the human
rotavirus unless they are derived in germ free state by caesarean
operation and raised with restricted and known microbiota as gnotobiotes [49] a condition that can be called as induced dysbiosis.
Diarrhoea associated with rotavirus:
Breast-feeding helps in preventing the nosocomial rotavirus infection
and prevention of diarrhoea in infected infants. Asymtomatic virus
shedding was also seen in non-breast-fed infants.[50] It
is recommended that breast-feeding should continue for the first two years [51] and that should be exclusive for the
first 6 months of life.[52] The natural age of
complete weaning for human children is thought to be between 2.3 and 7
years of age.[53] Ideally, child should guide the mother
when to stop the breast-feeding completely and not the vice versa.
Cooperstock and Zedd [54] divided the development of the intestinal
microbiota in infants and children into 4 phases as follows:
Phase-1:
Acquisition of microbiota from transient one over the first 1–2 wk occurs
during phase 1. This phase extends 2 weeks after the birth.
Phase-2:
Period of exclusive breast-feeding after the phase 1 till the start of
food supplementation is phase 2.
Phase-3:
Period of supplementation after the phase 2 till weaning is phase 3
Phase-4:
From weaning till the growth of biota resembling adult is phase 4.
Nutrition of a child up to phase-2 i.e. exclusive breast-feeding is
ultimate. The infection of rotavirus causing acute disease is uncommon
during this period. Although the composition of breast milk of a mother of
Palaeolithic era could be somewhat different than that of the modern
mother by and large pattern of nutrients would be similar. The child
receives a supplemental diet during phase 3 and a weaning diet during
phase 4. These diets may range from Palaeolithic pattern to a complete non
-Palaeolithic pattern/ modern pattern made up of highly processed foods.
The extent of dysbiosis could depend upon the type of food pattern of
these diets.
Bottle-feeding is common and may happen quite early in some infants.
Lactic acid bacteria dominate the microbiota of breast-fed infant as
evidenced by presence of lactic acid in the faeces. The lactic acid was
absent in the faeces of formula-fed infants. The formula-fed infants also
had higher faecal ammonia and other potentially harmful bacterial products.[55] The authors have asked 3 questions that could be
answered as follows:
Should we retain a breast-fed style flora with limited ability to
ferment complex carbohydrates?
The answer is probably "No" as it is difficult to maintain the breast-fed
style flora. It is also impractical.
Can pro- and prebiotics achieve a flora with adult characteristics
but with more lactic acid bacteria in weaned infants?
Supplementation of food and weaning food should have natural pre- and
probiotics. It must be understood that the infant has a body similar to a
Palaeolithic infant. Modern and processed food for supplementation and
weaning is an artefact. The character of weaning diet having Palaeolithic-
like human diet pattern should be worked out.
Are there any health risks associated with such manipulations of the
flora?
Health risks are likely to be low if natural and hygienic food having high
prebiotic value [56] is planned carefully for stabilization
of flora. Fresh fruits and nuts may carry lesser health risks than animal
milks.
In the infant or child the dysbiotic condition created due to faulty
weaning as described above may prevail causing loss of resistance to
rotavirus leading to severe acute diarrhoea on exposure to the virus.
However, the infection of rotavirus itself may induce dysbiosis.[57] The dysbiotic conditions prevailing before and
after infection are naturally different.
The products generated by dysbiosis could be toxic, carcinogenic,
mutagenic or teratogenic and may affect the whole body. The abnormal
digestive products present in the gut are known as Ama in Indian medicine.[58] These products may be called as dysbiotics
(The term is not listed in the dictionary or medical texts) and could be
the markers of dysbiosis. The diet having pattern of Palaeolithic human
diet and/or predominantly raw vegan diet and life-style found on natural
living could be the preventive measure against dysbiosis.
Standardization of the assay of dysbiosis is required:
Nugent score is a simple and convenient method for quantitative
estimation of vaginal dysbiosis.[59] It requires only
smear of vagina and Gram staining. Unfortunately, a method for simple and
quantitative estimation of gut dysbiosis giving appropriate index is yet
to be developed and approved by the experts. It is the need of the day.
Methods to be devised for statistical bioassay of gut dysbiosis index
could be molecular, biochemical, clinical or their combinations. The
methods for field studies, particularly in developing countries, need to
be simple and rapid.
Culture independent methods for stool analysis for the study of
intestinal microbiota are preferred [60] for the simple reason
that the outcome of culture depends on representative stool sample that is
difficult to obtain. Cultural conditions promote growth of certain species
of bacteria and may not support the growth of some fastidious
autochthonous bacteria. Culture of mucosal microbiota is different than
the stool microbiota as mentioned by Tamboli et al.[1]
However stool cultures have been tried and may be essential for
identification of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.[61] Stool
may not be uniform and a randomly picked up sample of a part of stool is
not a desirable material particularly for a quantitative assay of
metabolic markers of mucosal microbiota. A better sample of total bowel
content for dysbiotic studies of a person appearing normal may be obtained
by collection of complete morning stool followed by an enema by inert
material, mixing thoroughly and then picking up the proportional sample.
Rectal swab samples have been used successfully for studying
molecular epidemiology of antibiotic resistance Gram-negative bacilli in a
neonatal intensive care unit during a non-outbreak period [62] and for isolation of Staphylococcus aureus strains from healthy
infants.[63] Although these are convenient samples
these have yet to be demonstrated as an acceptable for quantitative
dysbiosis studies.
Blood and urine provide better samples for the quantitative assay of
dysbiosis than stool or rectal swab. The metabolic activity of gut
microbiota is determined by the amount of enzymes produced by them and
their activity results in certain products that can be detected in faeces,[64], blood [65] or urine.[66]
Urease producing microorganisms hydrolyse urea and produce ammonia
that raises the pH of the stool. This action is linked with the colon
cancer.[67] The urease in the stool, stool ammonia and stool
pH when raised are the markers of intestinal dysbiosis. Urease may be
produced by several bacterial species and thus the amount of urease rather
than the individual population of bacteria producing it carries
significance. Moreover, it is easier to study stool urease than studying
individual bacterial populations. The fresh stool samples give correct
values for the stool urease assay. The values may decline during storage
of stool sample.
Such procedures are usually used in controlled experiments and
quantitative values for routine clinical application are yet to be
defined. Another important thing in this regard is that quantitative
rather than qualitative test carry significance.[68]
The bacterial tryptophanase degrades tryptophan to phenol, which is a
nephrotoxin[69] and can be detected in the urine. Thus
urinary phenol is a marker of gut dysbiosis.[70] It is
interesting to see e.g. what would be the course of rotavirus in terms of
pathogenesis that has crossed the intestinal barrier in the presence or
absence of agents like phenol in the blood.
Similarly, degradation of amino acid residues by bacterial decarboxylase
produces amines that are toxic. Metchnikoff recognized this toxicity
almost a century ago.[2] The free primary amines particularly p-tyramine
present in the faeces was more in the infants (1-18 months) with
gastroenteritis than healthy ones. The amine concentration was
significantly related to the diet and was low in breast fed infants than
infants fed cow milk.[71] Since the amines are deaminated
in the liver, stool sample rather than blood sample is preferred for the
study of dysbiosis in this case.
Activities of gut bacterial azoreductase [72] and
nitroreductase [73] are harmful to the body and the
quantitative assay of these enzymes also provides information on gut
dysbiosis.
Oestrogen is conjugated in the liver and excreted in the bile.
However its deconjugation occurs in the gut due to bacterial beta-
glucuronidase releasing oestrogen that is reabsorbed raising the level of
this hormone in the blood. This is implicated in the breast cancer. The
same enzyme also deconjugates the bile releasing carcinogenic secondary
bile products.[74,75]
Isolation of nucleic acid, Community finger printing by Denaturing
Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE)/ Rapid Analysis of random amplified
polymorphic DNA, Sequence analysis using rDNA database and preparation of
phylogenic tree, Hybridisation in situ / whole cells/ Dot Blot- Southern
blot /Quantitative Slot Blot is a protocol suggested by [76] and McCartney [77] for the study of gut microbial populations.
Favier et al.[78] reported a method of molecular monitoring of
succession of bacterial communities from neonate to infant using faecal
samples. Recently, Vaughan et al. [79] and Tannock [80] have reviewed
the Molecular methods for exploring the intestinal ecosystem.
These methods may be modified for detection and quantitation of
dysbiosis. Having standardized these techniques to calculate a sort of
Dysbiotic Index, a great asset for research would be developed.
Predisposing conditions of not only rotavirus but also several other
diseases may be seen clearer. At this juncture no technique may be called
as the best but most of them are complementary to each other.
References
1. Tamboli C P, C Neut, P Desreumaux and J F Colombel. Dysbiosis in
inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 2004;53:1-4
2. Metchnikoff, E. 1910. The Prolongation of Life: Optomistic Studies,
Revised Edition of 1907, Heinemann, London
3. Bengmark S., Lund University, Sweden. Personal communication.
4. Dubos, R., Schaedler, R.W., Costello, R., and Hoet, P. 1965.
Indigenous, normal, and autochthonous flora of the gastrointestinal tract.
J. Exp. Med. 122: 67-76.
5. Savage DC. Gastrointestinal microflora in mammalian nutrition. Annu
Rev Nutr. 1986;6:155-78.
6. Savage DC. Microbial biota of the human intestine: a tribute to some
pioneering scientists. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol. 2001 Mar;2(1):1-15.
7. Bry L, Falk PG, Midtvedt T, Gordon JI. A model of host-microbial
interactions in an open mammalian ecosystem. Science. 1996 Sep
6;273(5280):1380-3.
8. Dunne C. Adaptation of bacteria to the intestinal niche: probiotics
and gut disorder. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2001 May;7(2):136-45.
9. Savage D (1999) Mucosal Microbiota. In Mucosal Immunology 2nd edition
(Ogral PL et al, ed) pp 19-30.
10. Bailey MT, Coe CL. Maternal separation disrupts the integrity of the
intestinal microflora in infant rhesus monkeys. Dev Psychobiol. 1999
Sep;35(2):146-55.
11. Smirnov KV, Lizko NN. Problems of space gastroenterology and
microenvironment. Nahrung. 1987;31(5-6):563-6.
12. Lizko NN. Stress and intestinal microflora. Nahrung. 1987;31(5-
6):443-7.
13. Bengmark S. Gut microbial ecology in critical illness: is there a
role for prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2002
Apr;8(2):145-51.
14. Hellingwerf KJ, Crielaard WC, Joost Teixeira de Mattos M, Hoff WD,
Kort R, Verhamme DT, Avignone-Rossa C. Current topics in signal
transduction in bacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1998 Nov;74(4):211-27.
18. Bates J. Epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in the
community and the relevance of farm animals to human infection. J Hosp
Infect. 1997 Oct;37(2):89-101
19. Zetterquist W, Pedroletti C, Lundberg JO, Alving K. Salivary
contribution to exhaled nitric oxide. Eur Respir J. 1999 Feb;13(2):327-33.
20. Akcay F, Aksoy H, Memisogullari R. Effect of breast-feeding on
concentration of nitric oxide in breast milk. Ann Clin Biochem. 2002
Jan;39(Pt 1):68-9.
21. Iizuka T, Sasaki M, Oishi K, Uemura S, Koike M, Shinozaki M. Non-
enzymatic nitric oxide generation in the stomachs of breastfed neonates.
Acta Paediatr. 1999 Oct;88(10):1053-5.
22. Uibu J, Tauts O, Levin A, Shimanovskaya N, Matto R. N-
nitrosodimethylamine, nitrate and nitrate-reducing microorganisms in human
milk. Acta Paediatr. 1996 Oct;85(10):1140-2.
23. Benz D, Cadet P, Mantione K, Zhu W, Stefano G. Tonal nitric oxide
and health: anti-bacterial and -viral actions and implications for HIV.Med
Sci Monit. 2002 Feb;8(2):RA27-31.
24. Zaragoza C, Ocampo CJ, Saura M, McMillan A, Lowenstein CJ. Nitric
oxide inhibition of coxsackievirus replication in vitro. J Clin Invest.
1997 Oct 1;100(7):1760
25. Iijima K, Henry E, Moriya A, Wirz A, Kelman AW, McColl KE. Dietary
nitrate generates potentially mutagenic concentrations of nitric oxide at
the gastroesophageal junction. Gastroenterology. 2002 May;122(5):1248-57.
26. van der Strate BW, Beljaars L, Molema G, Harmsen MC, Meijer DK.
Antiviral activities of lactoferrin. Antiviral Res. 2001 Dec;52(3):225-39.
27. Superti F, Ammendolia MG, Valenti P, Seganti L. Antirotaviral
activity of milk proteins: lactoferrin prevents rotavirus infection in the
enterocyte-like cell line HT-29. Med Microbiol Immunol (Berl). 1997
Oct;186(2-3):83-91.
28. Grover M, Giouzeppos O, Schnagl RD, May JT. Effect of human milk
prostaglandins and lactoferrin on respiratory syncytial virus and
rotavirus. Acta Paediatr. 1997 Mar;86(3):315-6.
29. Peterson JA, Hamosh M, Scallan CD, Ceriani RL, Henderson TR, Mehta
NR, Armand M, Hamosh P. Milk fat globule glycoproteins in human milk and
in gastric aspirates of mother's milk-fed preterm infants. Pediatr Res.
1998 Oct;44(4):499-506.
30. Newburg DS, Peterson JA, Ruiz-Palacios GM, Matson DO, Morrow AL,
Shults J, Guerrero ML, Chaturvedi P, Newburg SO, Scallan CD, Taylor MR,
Ceriani RL, Pickering LK. Role of human-milk lactadherin in protection
against symptomatic rotavirus infection. Lancet. 1998 Apr
18;351(9110):1160-4.
31. Peterson JA, Patton S, Hamosh M. Glycoproteins of the human milk fat
globule in the protection of the breast-fed infant against infections.
Biol Neonate. 1998;74(2):143-62.
32. Peterson JA, Scallan CD, Ceriani RL, Hamosh M. Structural and
functional aspects of three major glycoproteins of the human milk fat
globule membrane. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2001;501:179-87.
33. Newburg DS. Human milk glycoconjugates that inhibit pathogens. Curr
Med Chem. 1999 Feb;6(2):117-27.
34. Black ME, Armstrong D. Human-milk lactadherin in protection against
rotavirus. Lancet. 1998 Jun 13;351(9118):1815-6.
35. Bishop RF, Bugg HC, Masendycz PJ, Lund JS, Gorrell RJ, Barnes GL.
Serum, fecal, and breast milk rotavirus antibodies as indices of infection
in mother-infant pairs. J Infect Dis. 1996 Sep;174 Suppl 1:S22-9.
36. Brussow H, Barclay D, Sidoti J, Rey S, Blondel A, Dirren H,
Verwilghen AM, Van Geert C. Effect of malnutrition on serum and milk
antibodies in Zairian women. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1996 Jan;3(1):37-41.
37. Losonsky GA, D'Alessandra de Rimer H. Rotavirus specific breast
milk antibody in two populations and possible correlates of protection.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 1991;310:265-9.
38. Haffejee IE, Moosa A, Windsor I. Circulating and breast-milk anti-
rotaviral antibodies and neonatal rotavirus infections: a maternal-
neonatal study. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1990 Mar;10(1):3-14.
39. Jayashree S, Bhan MK, Kumar R, Bhandari N, Sazawal S. Protection
against neonatal rotavirus infection by breast milk antibodies and trypsin
inhibitors. J Med Virol. 1988 Nov;26(3):333-8.
40. Ringenbergs M, Albert MJ, Davidson GP, Goldworthy W, Haslam R.
Serotype-specific antibodies to rotavirus in human colostrum and breast
milk and in maternal and cord blood. J Infect Dis. 1988 Aug;158(2):477-80.
41. Bell LM, Clark HF, Offit PA, Slight PH, Arbeter AM, Plotkin SA.
Rotavirus serotype-specific neutralizing activity in human milk. Am J Dis
Child. 1988 Mar;142(3):275-8.
42. Hjelt K, Grauballe PC, Nielsen OH, Schiotz PO, Krasilnikoff PA.
Rotavirus antibodies in the mother and her breast-fed infant. J Pediatr
Gastroenterol Nutr. 1985 Jun;4(3):414-20.
43. McLean BS, Holmes IH. Effects of antibodies, trypsin, and trypsin
inhibitors on susceptibility of neonates to rotavirus infection. J Clin
Microbiol. 1981 Jan;13(1):22-9.
44. Cukor G, Blacklow NR, Capozza FE, Panjvani ZF, Bednarek F.
Persistence of antibodies to rotavirus in human milk. J Clin Microbiol.
1979 Jan;9(1):93-6.
45. Cebra JJ, Han-Qing Jiang, Sterzl J, Tlaskalova-Hogenova H (1999). The
Role Of Mucosal Microbiota In The Development And Maintenance Of The
Mucosal Immune System. In Mucosal Immunology 2nd edition (Ogral PL et al,
ed) pp 267-280.
46. Cunningham-Rundles S, Ahrne S, Bengmark S, Johann-Liang R, Marshall
F, Metakis L, Califano C, Dunn AM, Grassey C, Hinds G, Cervia J.
Probiotics and immune response. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Jan;95(1
Suppl):S22-5.
47. Lichtman SM. Bacterial [correction of baterial] translocation in
humans. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2001 Jul;33(1):1-10.
49. Saif LJ, Ward LA, Yuan L, Rosen BI, To TL. The gnotobiotic piglet as
a model for studies of disease pathogenesis and immunity to human
rotaviruses. Arch Virol Suppl. 1996;12:153-61.
50. Gianino P, Mastretta E, Longo P, Laccisaglia A, Sartore M, Russo R,
Mazzaccara A. Incidence of nosocomial rotavirus infections, symptomatic
and asymptomatic, in breast-fed and non-breast-fed infants. J Hosp Infect.
2002 Jan;50(1):13-7
51. Canadian Paediatric Society, Dieticians of Canada and Health Canada.
Nutrition for Healthy Term Infants (Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and
Governmental Services, 1998), p. 3.
52. Kramer M S, Kakuma R The Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding:
A systematic review, a booklet published by WHO, Geneva, 47 pages
53. Dettwyler, K.A. “A time to wean: the hominid blueprint for the
natural age of weaning in modern human populations”, in P. Stuart-MacAdam
& K.A. Dettwyler (eds), Breastfeeding: Biocultural Perspectives (New
York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1995)
54. Cooperstock, MS and Zedd AJ (1983) Intestinal flora in infants. In
“Human Intestinal Flora In Health And Disease” (DJ Hentges, ed). Pp 79-
100. Academic Press, New York.
55. Edwards CA, Parrett AM. Intestinal flora during the first months of
life: new perspectives. Br J Nutr. 2002 Sep;88 Suppl 1:S11-8.
56. Deolankar RP, Prebiotics scores of foods for the formulation of some
functional foods (15 March 2004), BMJ Rapid Rapid Response.
57. Gizatulina SS, Birger MO, Nikovskaia MI, Mastiukova IuN, Potashova
LA. [Intestinal microflora in young children with rotavirus infection] Zh
Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol. 1992 Mar;(3):29-30. Russian
58. Dahanukar SA, Thatte UM. Ayurveda Revisited: Ayurveda in the light of
contemporary medicine. Popular Prakashan, Bombay, P-42.
59. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial
vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain
interpretation. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Feb;29(2):297-301
60. Dunne C. Adaptation of bacteria to the intestinal niche: probiotics
and gut disorder. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2001 May;7(2):136-45.
62. Toltzis P, Dul MJ, Hoyen C, Salvator A, Walsh M, Zetts L, Toltzis H.
Molecular epidemiology of antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacilli in a
neonatal intensive care unit during a nonoutbreak period. Pediatrics. 2001
Nov;108(5):1143-8.
63. Lindberg E, Nowrouzian F, Adlerberth I, Wold AE. Long-time
persistence of superantigen-producing Staphylococcus aureus strains in the
intestinal microflora of healthy infants. Pediatr Res. 2000 Dec;48(6):741-
7.
64. Gorbach SL, Goldin BR. The intestinal microflora and the colon
cancer connection. Rev Infect Dis. 1990 Jan-Feb;12 Suppl 2:S252-61.
65. Goldin BR. Intestinal microflora: metabolism of drugs and
carcinogens. Ann Med. 1990 Feb;22(1):43-8.
66. Bone E, Tamm A, Hill M. The production of urinary phenols by gut
bacteria and their possible role in the causation of large bowel cancer.
Am J Clin Nutr. 1976 Dec;29(12):1448-54.
67. Malhotra SL. Faecal urobilinogen levels and pH of stools in
population groups with different incidence of cancer of the colon, and
their possible role in its aetiology. J R Soc Med. 1982 Sep;75(9):709-14
68. Ishidate M Jr, Sofuni T, Nohmi T. Quantitative evaluation on the
genotoxic potency of chemicals. J Toxicol Sci. 1991 Feb;16 Suppl 1:83-92.
69. Fukui S, Ikeda S, Fujimura M, Yamada H, Kumagai H. Comparative
studies on the properties of tryptophanase and tyrosine phenol-lyase
immobilized directly on Sepharose or by use of Sepharose-bound pyridoxal
5'-phosphate. Eur J Biochem. 1975 Feb 3;51(1):155-64.
70. Chung K-T, Fulk GE, Slein MW. Tryptophanase of fecal flora as a
possible factor in the etiology of colon cancer. J Natl Can Inst 1975,
54:1073-1078
71. Murray KE, Adams RF, Earl JW, Shaw KJ. Studies of the free faecal
amines of infants with gastroenteritis and of healthy infants. Gut. 1986
Oct;27(10):1173-80.
72. Chung KT, Stevens SE Jr, Cerniglia CE. The reduction of azo dyes by
the intestinal microflora. Crit Rev Microbiol. 1992;18(3):175-90.
73. Goldin BR, Gorbach SL. Alterations of the intestinal microflora by
diet, oral antibiotics, and Lactobacillus: decreased production of free
amines from aromatic nitro compounds, azo dyes, and glucuronides. J Natl
Cancer Inst. 1984 Sep;73(3):689-95.
74. Hill MJ, Melville DM, Lennard-Jones JE, Neale K, Ritchie JK. Faecal
bile acids, dysplasia, and carcinoma in ulcerative colitis. Lancet. 1987
Jul 25;2(8552):185-6.
75. Bennet JD. Ulcerative colitis: the result of an altered bacterial
metabolism of bile acids or cholesterol. Med Hypotheses. 1986 Jun;20
(2):125-32.
76. Mackie RI, Sghir A, Gaskins HR. Developmental microbial ecology of
the neonatal gastrointestinal tract. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999 May;69(5):1035S-
1045S
77. McCartney AL, McCartney AL. Application of molecular biological
methods for studying probiotics and the gut flora. Br J Nutr. 2002 Sep;88
Suppl 1:29-37.
78. Favier CF, Vaughan EE, De Vos WM, Akkermans AD. Molecular monitoring
of succession of bacterial communities in human neonates. Appl Environ
Microbiol. 2002 Jan;68(1):219-26.
79. Vaughan EE, Schut F, Heilig HG, Zoetendal EG, de Vos WM, Akkermans
AD. A molecular view of the intestinal ecosystem. Curr Issues Intest
Microbiol. 2000 Mar;1(1):1-12.)
80. Tannock GW. Molecular methods for exploring the intestinal
ecosystem. Br J Nutr. 2002 May;87 Suppl 2:S199-201.
unfortunately doctors, all around the world, ignore the progress of
physical semeiotics of last three decades, i.e. Biophysical Semeiotics
(See HONCode site 233736, http:/digilander.libero.it/semeioticabiofisica).
In fact physical semeiotics is poor, if applied to some biological
systems. As far as clinical gastroenteroly is...
unfortunately doctors, all around the world, ignore the progress of
physical semeiotics of last three decades, i.e. Biophysical Semeiotics
(See HONCode site 233736, http:/digilander.libero.it/semeioticabiofisica).
In fact physical semeiotics is poor, if applied to some biological
systems. As far as clinical gastroenteroly is concerned, I must to point
out that such a statement is true, but exclusively for physicians who know
exclusively the old, traditional, academic physical examination. On the
contrary, by the aid of “biophysical-semeiotic” examination, every
intuition passes successively through the precise, objective, critical
filter of the “new” physical examination, based on accurate and reliable
data, biological systems provide learned doctor, using a simple
stethoscope.[1-3] Fortunately, nowadays Biophysical Semeiotics is a
reality and I consider preisworthy those mass-media, and particularly
medicine peer reviews, as BMJ, BCMJ,[4] and NEJM,[5] which help
efficaciously to spread the new that physical semeiotics is no longer the
Cinderella among other numerous medical disciplines, in a world ruled by
high, sophysticated technology.
References
(1) Stagnaro-Neri M, Stagnaro S. Semeiotica Biofisica del torace,
della circolazione ematica e dell’anticorpopoiesi acuta e cronica. Acta
Med Medit 1997;13:25.
(2) Stagnaro-Neri M., Stagnaro S., Semeiotica
Biofisica: la manovra di Ferrero-Marigo nella diagnosi clinica della
iperinsulinemia-insulino resistenza. Acta Med Medit 1997; 13:125.
(3) Stagnaro-Neri M, Stagnaro S. Semeiotica Biofisica: valutazione clinica
del picco precoce della secrezione insulinica di base e dopo stimolazione
tiroidea, surrenalica, con glucagone endogeno e dopo attivazione del
sistema renina-angiotesina circolante e tessutale. Acta Med Medit 1997;13:99.
(4) Stagnaro S. Depression, Anxiety and Psychosis. BC Medical
Journal 2001;43(6):321.
(5) Stagnaro S, West PJ, Hu FB, Manson JE, Willett WC. Diet and Risk of Type 2
Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2002;346(4):297-298.
We read with interest the case report by Buchel et al., published on
the July issue.[1] The authors report a patient with portal hypertension,
nodular regenerative hyperplasia and portal thrombosis that presented an
avascular hip necrosis after a liver transplantation (OLT). The authors
suggest that the whole clinical picture might stem from
hyperhomocysteinaemia (high Hcy) and 677C->T heterozigosi...
We read with interest the case report by Buchel et al., published on
the July issue.[1] The authors report a patient with portal hypertension,
nodular regenerative hyperplasia and portal thrombosis that presented an
avascular hip necrosis after a liver transplantation (OLT). The authors
suggest that the whole clinical picture might stem from
hyperhomocysteinaemia (high Hcy) and 677C->T heterozigosity for the
common gene of methylen-tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR).
Although the history is suggestive of this hypothesis, high Hcy might
also be a secondary phenomenon. It is not clear whether high Hcy was
demonstrated in a sample obtained before – as suggested in Table – or
after OLT – as suggested in the text. In both cases Hcy might be elevated
as a consequence of either liver disease or drug treatment.
Liver disease per se raises Hcy, due to the multiple metabolic
problems generated by a failing liver, including low folate levels,
altered transsulphuration/transmethylation pathway and decreased renal
function. High Hcy is present in 50% of liver disease patients, and values
as high as 30 µmol/L are not uncommon in end-stage disease [2],
independently of MTHFR polymorphism.
After OLT a specific effect of tacrolimus on Hcy metabolism and
concentration is well documented. Both calcineurin inhibitors
(cyclosporine and tacrolimus) are known to interfere with the folate-
dependent remethylation of Hcy, thus raising plasma levels to values in
the pathological range. The problem is well documented in patients
following with renal [3], cardiac [4] and liver transplant [2]. In a
recent analysis of 230 patients submitted to OLT we found 26 cases with
fasting Hcy >= 30 µmol/L in the late post-transplant phase,
independently of MTHFR polymorphism.[5]
Also the relationship between high Hcy and MTHFR polymorphism
deserves a comment. The MTHFR gene independently and unfavourably
influences homocysteine metabolism, but high Hcy levels are mainly
observed in subjects with low folate levels [6], indicating a low
phenotypic expression. Therefore, the presence of the genetic variant,
mainly in its heterozygous form, might be an occasional phenomenon without
any clinical significance. In conclusion, although the clinical history of
the patients raises the suggested pathogenic role of Hcy and genetic
predisposition, no clues can be made on the “egg-chicken” sequence,
particularly in a patient with positive markers for hepatitis B infection.
For sure, an adequate folate intake or pharmacological
supplementation may overcome the genetic predisposition to high Hcy, but
may also decrease Hcy independently of any gene defect, and remains a
suitable therapeutic option to prevent additional vascular problems.
References
1. Buchel O, Roskams T, Van Damme B, et al. Nodular regenerative
hyperplasia, portal vein thrombosis, and avascular hip necrosis due to
hyperhomocysteinaemia. Gut 2005;54:1021-3.
2. Bosy-Westphal A, Ruschmeyer M, Czech N, et al. Determinants of
hyperhomocysteinemia in patients with chronic liver disease and after
orthotopic liver transplantation. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77:1269-77.
3. Fernandez-Miranda C, Gomez P, Diaz-Rubio P, et al. Plasma
homocysteine levels in renal transplanted patients on cyclosporine or
tacrolimus therapy: effect of treatment with folic acid. Clin Transplant
2000;14:110-4.
4. Cole DE, Ross HJ, Evrovski J, et al. Correlation between total
homocysteine and cyclosporine concentrations in cardiac transplant
recipients. Clin Chem 1998;44:2307-12.
5. Bianchi G, Nicolino F, Passerini G, et al. Plasma total homocysteine and cardiovascular risk in patients submitted to liver transplantation. Liver Transplant (in press).
6. Potena L, Grigioni F, Viggiani M, et al. Interplay between
methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphism 677C-->T and
serum folate levels in determining hyperhomocysteinemia in heart
transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 2001;20:1245-51.
Mario Guido and Massimo Rugge make important points about the
interpretation of liver biopsy if the sample is small.[1]
Our study [2] was
accepted for publication before the Colloredo article was published in
the Journal of Hepatology and we would agree that the standards for
accepting a liver biopsy as adequate have changed in the light of their
data.
Mario Guido and Massimo Rugge make important points about the
interpretation of liver biopsy if the sample is small.[1]
Our study [2] was
accepted for publication before the Colloredo article was published in
the Journal of Hepatology and we would agree that the standards for
accepting a liver biopsy as adequate have changed in the light of their
data.
With respect to our study, we can confirm that the median number of
portal tracts per biopsy was 15 in the second biopsy where that showed
regression with only no biopsy having less than 11. Analysis of size and
portal tract number in the groups of patients who progressed, remained
stable or regressed showed no difference. In particular the second biopsy
sample in "regressors" contained a higher median number of portal tracts
than the index biopsy. Using the critera established by Brunetti et al,
only six biopsies from the whole cohort would have been characterised by
them as inadequate and omitting these patients from the analysis does not
alter the results.
We therefore feel that the biopsy size in our study is adequate and
the conclusions remain valid.
References
(1) Guido M and Rugge M. Liver fibrosis: natural history may be affected by the biopsy sample [electronic response to Ryder; Progression of hepatic fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C: a prospective repeat liver biopsy study] gutjnl.com 2004http://gut.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/53/3/451#398
(2) S D Ryder. Progression of hepatic fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C: a prospective repeat liver biopsy study. Gut 2004; 53: 451-455
We read with interest the findings of Forrest et al ; Gut 2005; 54: 1174-1179, regarding their prognostic algorithm for alcoholic hepatitis;
Glasgow alcoholic hepatitis score (GAHS). The study uses robust clinical
end-points to develop an algorithm that has diagnostic advantages over the
modified discriminant function score (DFS). We would like to discuss some
of the future implications of this importa...
We read with interest the findings of Forrest et al ; Gut 2005; 54: 1174-1179, regarding their prognostic algorithm for alcoholic hepatitis;
Glasgow alcoholic hepatitis score (GAHS). The study uses robust clinical
end-points to develop an algorithm that has diagnostic advantages over the
modified discriminant function score (DFS). We would like to discuss some
of the future implications of this important study.
The overall death rate in the study was 23% at 28 days and the death
rate of patients with a DFS >32 was 29% at 28 days in the derivation
population. The latter figure is lower than the placebo arms of many of
the RCTs of alcoholic hepatitis that range between 35 to 50%.[1-3] This
difference compared to the published literature may be attributable to
case definition. It is possible that there were a fewer number of patients
in the derivation cohort for GAHS with true alcoholic hepatitis. Some of
the previous studies of alcoholic hepatitis have required liver biopsy
evidence of alcoholic hepatitis as part of the case definition. This was
not the case for entry into the derivation cohort for the GAHS study and
the case definition was based solely on clinical and biochemical evidence
of liver dysfunction in patients with heavy alcohol consumption. In the
validation population there was biopsy evidence of alcoholic hepatitis in
only 33%.
While this may invalidate the GAHS as a means for identifying cases
of alcoholic hepatitis it does not invalidate its use in identifying
patients at risk of death when admitted to hospital with liver dysfunction
on a background of heavy alcohol use. This makes it far more pragmatic
than tests based on biopsies as many hospitals do not have access to
specialised services to perform transjugular liver biopsies in the acute
setting. Furthermore, there are published RCTs which have not required
histological evidence of alcoholic hepatitis before allocating treatment.[1,4] The corollary to this is that although alcoholic hepatitis often
presents with clinical features of fever, leucocytosis and
hyperbilirubinaemia, there remains a differential diagnosis which may
require a biopsy to resolve.[5]
It is important to differentiate between true alcoholic hepatitis and
severe liver dysfunction in patients with heavy alcohol consumption
because it will influence the choice of intervention. Randomised
controlled trials that use GAHS to identify patients with alcoholic
hepatitis might be greatly underpowered if the therapy, e.g. steroids, is
effective in alcoholic hepatitis but ineffective or harmful in other
clinical conditions where abnormal clinical parameters might be associated
with heavy alcohol consumption. The selection of risk stratification
models should be determined by the severity of the adverse effects of the
therapy under trial. Those with more severe adverse effects will warrant
models with high specificity whereas drugs with minimal side effects will
benefit from a model with a high sensitivity. Compared to the DFS, the
GAHS has an increased specificity, decreased sensitivity and improved
accuracy making it suited to the selection of subjects in studies using
more toxic therapies.
The utility of the GAHS will depend upon the effect of its use in the
care of patients. We suggest that the next step in the evaluation of GAHS
should be a clinical trial to see if patients randomised to risk
stratification with GAHS followed by appropriate interventions have a
better outcome than those managed conventionally.
We think this is an excellent study using robust clinical end points.
It is a practical model which can be used easily at the bed side, to give
valuable prognostic information. Success of future therapeutic trials in
alcoholic hepatitis will not only depend on the efficacy of the drug but
also the appropriate selection of patients by models and their respective
cut-off points.
Yours sincerely,
I N Guha
WM Rosenberg
University of Southampton Liver Unit
Mail point 811
Level D
Southampton General Hospital
Trenoma Road
S016 6YD
References
1. Carithers RL, Jr., Herlong HF, Diehl AM, Shaw EW, Combes B, Fallon
HJ, Maddrey WC. Methylprednisolone therapy in patients with severe
alcoholic hepatitis. A randomized multicenter trial. Ann Intern Med
1989;110:685-690.
2. Mathurin P, Mendenhall CL, Carithers RL, Jr., Ramond MJ, Maddrey
WC, Garstide P, Rueff B, Naveau S, Chaput JC, Poynard T. Corticosteroids
improve short-term survival in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis
(AH): individual data analysis of the last three randomized placebo
controlled double blind trials of corticosteroids in severe AH. J Hepatol
2002;36:480-487.
3. Ramond MJ, Poynard T, Rueff B, Mathurin P, Theodore C, Chaput JC,
Benhamou JP. A randomized trial of prednisolone in patients with severe
alcoholic hepatitis. N Engl J Med 1992;326:507-512.
4. Mendenhall CL, Anderson S, Garcia-Pont P, Goldberg S, Kiernan T,
Seeff LB, Sorrell M, Tamburro C, Weesner R, Zetterman R. Short-term and
long-term survival in patients with alcoholic hepatitis treated with
oxandrolone and prednisolone. N Engl J Med 1984;311:1464-1470.
5. Oxford Textbook of Clinical Hepatology 2nd Edition. Edited by
Bircher J, Benhamou J, Mcintyre N, Rizetto M and Rodes J. Volume 2,
Chapter 15.3; 1185-1238.
Recently an excellent revision by Thalheimer et al. has been published
in which the lack of evidence to support the usefulness of monitoring
target reduction of Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) during the
pharmacological treatment for the prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in
portal hypertension is analyzed.[1]
This lack of evidence may be due to the
heterogeneity in the main studi...
Recently an excellent revision by Thalheimer et al. has been published
in which the lack of evidence to support the usefulness of monitoring
target reduction of Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) during the
pharmacological treatment for the prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in
portal hypertension is analyzed.[1]
This lack of evidence may be due to the
heterogeneity in the main studies in aspects such as the proportion of
alcoholic patients, the illness severity, the interval between the basal
HVPG and the HVPG after treatment, the administration of combined
treatment, as well as the presence of bias like no remeasurement of HVPG
in patients who rebled. The revision concluded that a clinical assay would
be necessary to gather sufficient evidence of the usefulness of this
technique in this context.
A prospective cohorts study is being performed currently in our Unit
in which some of these aspects have been taken into account. Cirrhotic
patients with esophageal variceal bleeding admitted to our unit are
included. Those patients with HVPG less than 12 mmHg, with beta–bloquer
contraindications, those aged <18 or >80, with a uninodular
hepatocarcinoma <5 cm or multinodular hepatocarcinoma, portal
thrombosis, type 1 hepatorenal syndrome or a score of 15 on the Child-Pugh
scale have been excluded. The bleeding episode is treated with
somatostatine (5 to 7 days) and urgent diagnostic and therapeutic
endoscopy (sclerosis with ethanol amine). Twenty-four hours after
somatostatine withdrawal a first hemodynamic study is performed in which
basal HVPG and HVPG after a propranolol bolus (0.15 mg/kg iv) are
measured. Responder patients receive oral propranolol titrated at heart
rate. Non- responders are included in a variceal band ligation programme
as well as treated with oral propranolol. After three months, regardless
of any episode of rebleeding, a second hemodynamic study is performed
under oral propranolol treatment. Those patients who respond receive only
oral propranolol and those non-responders receive only variceal band
ligation. In both studies the responder status is defined as a decrease of
HVPG to 12 mmHg or less, or more than 20% related to the basal HVPG.
Up to the present moment 26 patients have been included, 16 men and
10 women, with a mean age of 56+9. The aetiology was alcoholic in 10
patients (38%), viral in 12 (46%), and others in 4 (15%). The Child-Pugh
score was: 7 patients Child-Pugh A, 11 B and 8 C (mean 8+2). Mean follow-
up was 265+146 days. The basal, after endovenous propranolol and after
chronic per oral propranolol HVPG was 19+4, 16+5* and 16+5* respectively
(*p<_0.05 xmlns:performed="urn:x-prefix:performed" compared="compared" with="with" basal.="basal." in="in" _4="_4" patients="patients" _15="_15" the="the" second="second" hemodynamic="hemodynamic" study="study" was="was" not="not" performed:_="performed:_" _2="_2" of="of" them="them" died="died" _1="_1" because="because" early="early" rebleeding="rebleeding" and="and" other="other" refused="refused" catheterism.="catheterism." we="we" did="did" find="find" significant="significant" differences="differences" regard="regard" to="to" hvpg="hvpg" response="response" rates="rates" between="between" intravenous="intravenous" oral="oral" propranolol.="propranolol." ten="ten" _38="_38" responded="responded" propranolol="propranolol" _9="_9" _40="_40" four="four" rebled="rebled" all="all" were="were" non-responders="non-responders" respond="respond" one="one" before="before" beginning="beginning" band="band" programme.="programme." p="p"/> According to our findings to date it seems that a prospective cohorts
study would be a good alternative to a clinical assay if there were no
excessive patient loss in the follow up. Our study suggests that a single
early hemodynamic study using intravenous propranolol could be useful to
select the most suitable prophylaxis, avoiding a second test, which is
expensive, invasive and normally performed after the highest risk period
of rebleeding (the first 6 weeks).
Reference
(1) U Thalheimer, M Mela, D Patch, and A K Burroughs
Monitoring target reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient during pharmacological therapy of portal hypertension: a close look at the evidence
Gut 2004; 53: 143-148.
We read with considerable interest the article by Jarvela et al. (Gut 2005;54:643-647), who investigate the relationship between the genotype of adult-type hypolactasia and the risk of colorectal cancer in
the Finnish, British, and Spanish populations. In this study, the C/C–13910 genotype, a robust molecular marker of lactase non-persistence[1], was found to significantly associate with the risk of c...
We read with considerable interest the article by Jarvela et al. (Gut 2005;54:643-647), who investigate the relationship between the genotype of adult-type hypolactasia and the risk of colorectal cancer in
the Finnish, British, and Spanish populations. In this study, the C/C–13910 genotype, a robust molecular marker of lactase non-persistence[1], was found to significantly associate with the risk of colorectal cancer in the Finnish population; no significant risk was detected in the British or Spanish populations.
Despite the presence of a hereditary component, colorectal cancer is closely associated with environmental factors, such as diet.[2] High consumption of dietary fat, refined carbohydrates and red meat, are associated with high risk of colon cancer. By contrast, fruits, vegetables, whole grain cereals, fish and calcium has been associated with
reduced risk.
The effect of diet on the carcinogenic process could be mediated by changes in metabolic activity and composition of the colonic microflora. Bacteria such as bacteroides, eubacteria and clostridia could play a part in initiation of colon cancer through production of carcinogens,
cocarcinogens, or procarcinogens, while lactic acid producing bacteria (LAB), such as lactobacillus and bifidobacteria, prevent tumorigenesis.[3]
In this regard, probiotics and prebiotics have received peculiar attention. In particular, a prebiotic is a non-digestible food ingredient able to indirectly stimulate growth and/or activity of LAB in the colon.[4] A number of poorly digested carbohydrates fall into this category. Lactose could be included in this group when consumed by
subjects with lactase non-persistence.[5] In these patients, lactose present in dairy products cannot be digested in the small intestine, and instead is fermented by bacteria in the colon, acting as a prebiotic.[6] In addition, a not negligible percentage of lactase non-persistence
patients are asymptomatic.[7]
Lactose is the predominant carbohydrate in milk. Consumption of milk is suggested to be inversely related to colorectal cancer incidence, and some of its component (calcium, vitamin D, lactose) could play a protecting role.[8]
Jarvela found that among the Finns, considered to have the highest consumption of milk in the world, people with lactase non-persistence have a higher risk to develop colorectal cancer. This is in contrast with the theory, that non absorbed lactose, acting as a prebiotic, prevents from
colorectal cancer. He tried to explain this findings in two ways. First of all, he considered down-regulation of lactase activity after weaning as a normal phenomenon; persistence of elevated lactase activity is thought to be a relatively recent human evolutionary mechanism regulated at the
transcription level: so, in terms of evolution, he suggested that milk may not be a nutritional need in adulthood and it may have some dangerous effects. According to this hypothesis, since milk is one of the staple foods of the Finnish diet, this population is submitted to the dangerous
effects of milk, and it is more exposed to risk for colorectal cancer. Otherwise, milk could be protective for colorectal cancer, but it is possible that same malabsorber finnish people exclude from the diet milk because intolerant. Consequently, this group of Finns can not beneficiate of protective effects of milk.
Nevertheless, the role of dairy products in colorectal cancer remain controversial. We can suggest that the prebiotic activity of lactose can principally realise in asymptomatic subjects who do not eliminate dairy products from their diet despite lactose malabsorption. To evaluate this hypothesis it could be useful to stratificate the population with lactase non-persistence into two groups: symptomatic patients and asymptomatic subjects. In the latter, it is possible that milk has a supplementary
protective effect due to the presence of lactose as prebiotic in addition to the other nutrients provided by milk. On the other hand, what is the risk of colorectal cancer in subjects consuming low lactose milk?
References
1) Rasinpera H, Savilahti E, Enattah NS, et al. A genetic test which can be used to diagnose adult-type hypolactasia in children. Gut 2004;53(11):1571-6
2) Guarner F, Malagelada JR. Gut flora in health and disease. Lancet 2003;360:512-519
3) Rowland IR, Gangolli SD. Role of gastrointestinal flora in the metabolic and toxicological activities of xenobiotics, in: B Ballantyne,
TC Mars, Syverson (Eds.), General and Applied Toxicology, Second ed.,
Macmillan Publishers Ltd., London, pp.561-576
4) Burns AJ, Rowland IR. Antigenotoxicity of probiotics and prebiotics on faecal water-induced DNA damage in human colon adenocarcinoma cells. Mutation Research 2004;551:233-243
5) Montalto M, Nucera G, Santoro L, et al. Effect of exogenous â-galactosidase in patients with lactose malabsorption and intolerance: a crossover double-blind placebo-controlled study. Eur J Clin Nutr
2005;59(4):489-93
6) Szilagyi A. Review artiche: lactose – a potential prebiotic.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002;16:1591-1602
7) Montalto M, Curigliano V, Santoro L, et al. Management and
treatment of lactose malabsorption. World J Gastroenterol in press
8) Norat T, Riboli E. Dairy products and colorectal cancer. A review
of possible mechanisms and epidemiological evidence. Eur J Clin Nutr
2003;57:1-17
Drs Riley and Attwood are to be commended for their recent
publication.[1] We have difficulty with one recommendation related to
dilatation. Under 6.1, it is stated that during oesophageal dilatation
that the endoscopist should be supported by at least two endoscopy
assistants. We agree that this certainly is desirable when complicated
strictures are dialatated or if one is dealing with an achalasi...
Drs Riley and Attwood are to be commended for their recent
publication.[1] We have difficulty with one recommendation related to
dilatation. Under 6.1, it is stated that during oesophageal dilatation
that the endoscopist should be supported by at least two endoscopy
assistants. We agree that this certainly is desirable when complicated
strictures are dialatated or if one is dealing with an achalasia patient.
However, for dialatation of Schatzki’s rings or simple peptic
strictures, one endoscopy assistant generally is sufficient. At our
institution, over the years numerous dialatations have been done with only
one assistant and without any adverse consequences.
As written, your guidelines seem to indicate that the standard of
care would be to have two endoscopy assistants present and I think this is
both unrealistic and unwarranted.
Reference
(1) SA Riley and SEA Attwood. Guidelines on the use of oesophageal dilatation in clinical practice. Gut 2004; 53: 1i-6i.
Dear Editor,
We have concerns about the recommendation of naso-gastric feeding in severe acute pancreatitis. Firstly, the recommendation is based on a feasibility study of 26 patients published in August 2000 in the International Journal of Pancreatology.
Secondly, it has been graded as grade B evidence. We therefore feel that this recommendation is misleading and inappropriate. We feel further evidence...
Dear Editor
We read with interest the article by Nwokolo et al reporting raised serum ghrelin levels following helicobacter pylori eradication.[1] There are some exceptions to the interpretation of the data that we would take.
The authors state that the increase in ghrelin levels seen in their study “lends support to the view that ghrelin could be involved in the long term regulation of body w...
Dear Editor
Tamboli et al[1] have initiated the discussion about dysbiosis that is rather a forgotten term.
Most of the Medical Dictionaries have yet to define this term. Dysbiosis as described by Metchnikoff (1910),[2] a colleague of Louis Pasteur, can be explained as the process rendering abnormal condition of the native gut micro-biota. Circumstances suggest that dysbiosis preceding the rotavirus...
Dear Editor
unfortunately doctors, all around the world, ignore the progress of physical semeiotics of last three decades, i.e. Biophysical Semeiotics (See HONCode site 233736, http:/digilander.libero.it/semeioticabiofisica).
In fact physical semeiotics is poor, if applied to some biological systems. As far as clinical gastroenteroly is...
Dear Editor,
We read with interest the case report by Buchel et al., published on the July issue.[1] The authors report a patient with portal hypertension, nodular regenerative hyperplasia and portal thrombosis that presented an avascular hip necrosis after a liver transplantation (OLT). The authors suggest that the whole clinical picture might stem from hyperhomocysteinaemia (high Hcy) and 677C->T heterozigosi...
Dear Editor
Mario Guido and Massimo Rugge make important points about the interpretation of liver biopsy if the sample is small.[1]
Our study [2] was accepted for publication before the Colloredo article was published in the Journal of Hepatology and we would agree that the standards for accepting a liver biopsy as adequate have changed in the light of their data.
With respect to our study,...
Dear Editor,
We read with interest the findings of Forrest et al ; Gut 2005; 54: 1174-1179, regarding their prognostic algorithm for alcoholic hepatitis; Glasgow alcoholic hepatitis score (GAHS). The study uses robust clinical end-points to develop an algorithm that has diagnostic advantages over the modified discriminant function score (DFS). We would like to discuss some of the future implications of this importa...
Dear Editor
Recently an excellent revision by Thalheimer et al. has been published in which the lack of evidence to support the usefulness of monitoring target reduction of Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) during the pharmacological treatment for the prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in portal hypertension is analyzed.[1]
This lack of evidence may be due to the heterogeneity in the main studi...
Dear Editor,
We read with considerable interest the article by Jarvela et al. (Gut 2005;54:643-647), who investigate the relationship between the genotype of adult-type hypolactasia and the risk of colorectal cancer in the Finnish, British, and Spanish populations. In this study, the C/C–13910 genotype, a robust molecular marker of lactase non-persistence[1], was found to significantly associate with the risk of c...
Dear Editor
Drs Riley and Attwood are to be commended for their recent publication.[1] We have difficulty with one recommendation related to dilatation. Under 6.1, it is stated that during oesophageal dilatation that the endoscopist should be supported by at least two endoscopy assistants. We agree that this certainly is desirable when complicated strictures are dialatated or if one is dealing with an achalasi...
Pages