RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 PTH-133 Electronic Personal Health Records For Patients On Home Parenteral Nutrition: A Patient Satisfaction Survey
JF Gut
JO Gut
FD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology
SP A270
OP A270
DO 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307263.579
VO 63
IS Suppl 1
A1 T Ambrose
A1 R Topan
A1 M Small
A1 JM Nightingale
A1 SM Gabe
YR 2014
UL http://gut.bmj.com/content/63/Suppl_1/A270.1.abstract
AB Introduction The public demand for flexible access to health information and services is growing, encouraged by Intnet trends and policies promoting patient involvement. Patients Know Best® (PKB) is an electronic patient centred system providing a secure forum for patients to interact with healthcare teams. With increasing use of this system by our home parenteral nutrition patients we aimed to assess patient satisfaction with a survey. Methods PKB was introduced to patients during routine clinic visits and verbal consent obtained. We recorded the frequency of use, total number of electronic discussions held and the number of additional carers (other healthcare staff or family members) involved in their personal health record. We distributed a 10 question survey to all users. Results 119 patients (50 male, 69 female) were registered over a period of 18 months with a median age of 49 years (range 17–85 years, mean 48 years). A total of 5015 unique electronic conversations were recorded. These would usually have occurred via telephone. PKB has been used for 4 patients transitioning from paediatric to adult services and 2 patients from abroad. Other patients invited included 128 outside clinicians (eg local nutrition nurses and dietitians, transplant coordinators) and 29 carers. There were 58/119 (48.7%) responses including 1 incomplete dataset (61% female). 31/57 patients (54.4%) were over 50 years of age. 42/57 (73.7%) received parenteral nutrition and 13/57 (22.8%) fluids and electrolytes. 51/58 (87.9%) patients felt at least “somewhat confident” working online with their healthcare team and the same number felt that having access to the results was at least “somewhat helpful” – 32 (62.7%) of these responding “very/extremely helpful”. 30/58 (51.7%) use PKB a few times a month, 4/58 (6.9%) a few times a week and the remainder less frequently. The more useful features of PKB included Discussions (ie contacting the St Mark’s Nutrition team electronically) and Monitoring (ie test results). Patients use PKB to contact doctors/nutrition nurses more than dietitians/administrators. Conclusion Our survey suggests that our patient cohort find this a useful facility to contact us and improve the management of their long-term conditions. Not all patients access PKB regularly and they only had a short period in which to respond to the survey. This may explain the 49% response rate in an otherwise motivated patient population. This is an emerging and effective way for patients to interact with their healthcare teams and we have not found it has increased our workload. The ability to communicate seamlessly between different healthcare professionals reduces the current difficulties which exist when transferring information between multiple care providers (eg HIFNET). Disclosure of Interest None Declared.