Table 1 Quality of evidence, classification of recommendation and voting on recommendation
Category and gradeDescription
Quality of evidence
IEvidence obtained from at least 1 RCT
II-1Evidence obtained from well-designed control trials without randomisation
II-2Evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case–control study
II-3Evidence obtained from comparison between time or places with or without intervention
IIIOpinion of respected authorities, based on clinical experience and expert committees
Classification of recommendation
AThere is good evidence to support the statement
BThere is fair evidence to support the statement
CThere is poor evidence to support the statement but recommendation made on other grounds
DThere is fair evidence to refute the statement
EThere is good evidence to refute the statement
Voting on recommendation*
aAccept completely
bAccept with some reservation
cAccept with major reservation
dReject with reservation
eReject completely
  • *Statements for which >80% of participants voted a, b or c were accepted.

  • RCT, randomised controlled trial.