Table 4

Multivariate analyses of the simplified model with clinicopathological characteristics in cohort 2 (n=314) and cohort 3 (n=73)

VariablesOSRFS
HR (95% CI)p ValueHR (95% CI)p Value
Cohort 2
 GGT (>54 U/l vs ≤54 U/l)1.78 (1.32 to 2.41)0.00021.53 (1.12 to 2.08)0.007
 Tumour encapsulation (none vs complete)1.28 (0.96 to 1.71)0.096NA
 Tumour differentiation (III–IV vs I–II)1.37 (1.00 to 1.87)0.049NA
 Tumour size (>5 cm vs ≤5 cm)1.50 (1.11 to 2.01)0.007NA
 Tumour number (multiple vs single)1.51 (1.05 to 2.17)0.0281.57 (1.05 to 2.34)0.027
 Vascular invasion (yes vs no)1.56 (1.07 to 2.27)0.0201.48 (0.98 to 2.23)0.060
 The simplified model<0.0001<0.0001
 Moderate risk vs low risk1.85 (1.19 to 2.87)0.0062.86 (1.67 to 4.88)0.0001
 High risk vs low risk3.89 (2.52 to 6.01)<0.00018.15 (4.78 to 13.90)<0.0001
Cohort 3
 GGT (>54 U/l vs ≤54 U/l)3.79 (1.18 to 12.14)0.025n.a.
 Child–Pugh score (B vs A)4.15 (0.72 to 23.83)0.111n.a.
 AFP (>20 ng/ml vs ≤20 ng/ml)1.84 (0.40 to 8.40)0.4331.57 (0.46 to 5.36)0.472
 Tumour size (>5 cm vs ≤5 cm)3.76 (1.08 to 13.06)0.0372.44 (0.83 to 7.22)0.106
 Vascular invasion (yes vs no)1.71 (0.57 to 5.14)0.3362.32 (0.89 to 6.05)0.084
 The simplified model0.0170.001
 Moderate risk vs low risk2.19 (0.40 to 11.86)0.3630.37 (0.37 to 10.42)0.425
 High risk vs low risk7.21 (1.49 to 34.93)0.0149.88 (2.17 to 45.11)0.003
  • Multivariate analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression model. Variables were adopted for their prognostic significance by univariate analysis.

  • AFP, α-fetoprotein; GGT, γ-glutamyl transferase; NA, not applicable; OS, overall survival; RFS, relapse-free survival.