Table 2

Increased abundance taxa associated with control samples

ControlsNormal-like IBSIBS cluster 1IBS cluster 2p Value
Phylum
Bacteroidetes40.6 (25.4–45.8)40.1 (22–50)13.8 (3.98–16.3)10.2 (5.45–17.4)<0.0001
Class
Bacteroidia38.9 (25.3–44.5)40.1 (18.3–49.9)13.7 (3.96–15.8)10 (5.02–14.7)<0.0001
Order
Bacteroidales38.9 (25.3–44.5)40.1 (18.3–49.9)13.7 (3.96–15.8)10 (5.02–14.7)<0.0001
Family
Bacteroidaceae16.2 (10.2–23.9)17.8 (8.91–32.5)5.55 (2.54–8.41)3.83 (1.73–9.26)<0.0001
Porphyromonadaceae6.1 (3.44–9.86)3.42 (2.38–6.44)1.53 (0.37–2.37)1.59 (0.575–2.06)<0.001
Rikenellaceae7.84 (5.87–10.8)7.03 (4.29–10.8)1.84 (0.49–4.66)1.6 (0.77–1.93)<0.001
Genus
Odoribacter0.3 (0.123–0.577)0.147 (0.068–0.278)0.013 (0.002–0.042)0.104 (0.045–0.227)<0.0001
Bacteroides16.2 (10.2–23.9)17.8 (8.91–32.5)5.55 (2.54–8.41)3.83 (1.73–9.26)<0.0001
Alistipes7.78 (5.7–10.3)6.99 (4.23–10.8)1.78 (0.491–4.5)1.4 (0.707–1.91)<0.001
  • Significant results from the four group Kruskal–Wallis analysis.

  • This table represents the taxa that have higher abundance in the control samples when compared with the high Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio IBS clusters.

  • Values are shown as the median and associated IQR for the percentage of reads for the taxa in each group.

  • IBS, irritable bowel syndrome.