Table 2

Available studies on patients with a prior or current cancer and exposure to immunosuppression

Study (year)PopulationNo of patientsOutcomeConclusion
Prior cancer
 Penn (1993)5 Renal transplant patients with prior cancer823Cancer recurrence22% with cancer recurrence
 Dixon et al (2010)14 RA patients with prior cancer exposed to anti-TNF177 Exposed
117 Unexposed
Rates of incident malignancyNo difference
Incidence rate ratio 0.58 (95% CI 0.23 to 1.43)
 Strangfeld et al (2010)15 RA patients with prior cancer exposed to anti-TNF55 Exposed
58 Unexposed
Rates of incident malignancyNo difference
Incidence rate ratio 1.4 (p=0.6)
 Beaugerie et al (2012)13 RA patients with prior cancer exposed to immunosuppression93 Exposed
312 Unexposed
Rates of incident malignancyNo difference
New cancer (p=0.98)
Recurrence cancer (p=0.26)
Current cancer
 Harrison et al (2007)32 Phase II trial of IFX in current immunotherapy resistant or refractory renal cell carcinoma37Disease progressionIFX beneficial with median duration of response of 7.7 (low dose) and 6.2 (high dose) months
 Brown et al (2008)33 IFX in current advanced cancer41Primary: safety profile/biological response. Secondary: clinical responseNo disease acceleration
 Wiedenmann et al (2008)34 Phase II trial of IFX in current pancreatic cancer89Primary: change in lean body mass. Secondary: surgical, progression free survival, Karnofksy performance status, 6 min walk test distanceSimilar overall survival and progression free survival
 Sogaard et al (2008)22 IBD patients with breast cancer67 (CD)
216 (UC)
Breast cancer treatment. SurvivalSurvival lower in CD (p=0.037)
 Jatoi et al (2010)35 Randomised trial of IFX in current metastatic non-small cell lung cancer32 Exposed
29 Unexposed
Primary: >10% weight gain. Secondary: tumour response rate and overall survivalNo difference
Tumour response rate (p=0.048)
Overall survival (p=0.88)
 Raaschou et al (2011)23 RA patients with cancer and prior exposure to anti-TNF314
586 Controls
Stage at diagnosis
Risk of death
Stage: No difference
Death: RR 1.1 (95% CI 0.8 to 1.6)
 Sultan et al (2012)24 IBD patients with lymphoma and prior exposure to thiopurine7 Exposed
7 Unexposed
Survival ratesNo difference (p=0.95)
 Axelrad et al (2012)40 IBD with current extra-intestinal solid malignancy69 Inactive IBD
15 Active IBD
IBD outcomes (remission, time to disease activation)Risk of flare with hormone therapy HR 11.04 (95% CI 1.22 to 99.85).
Cytotoxic chemotherapy associated with IBD remission
  • CD, Crohn's disease; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; IFX, infliximab; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; TNF, tumour necrosis factor; UC, ulcerative colitis.