Table 3

Overview of studies on interval CRCs after flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS)

StudiesDefinition iCRCDesignOutcomesStage of CRC
(I–II vs. III–IV)
Location of CRC (proximal vs. distal)Risk factors/ possible aetiology
Schoen et al (2012)58
USA
Screen detected: <12 months of positive FS; not detectable: stage I-II and >30 months; or stage III–IV >48 months; prevalent non-detected: stage I–II detected
<30 months or stage III–IV <48 months
PLCO multicentre trial; 77 447 intervention groupCRC incidence
977 CRCs: 243 screen detected
470 not detectable
264 prevalent non-detected
Screen detected: 184 vs. 59
Prevalent not detected: 95 vs. 169
Not detectable: 256 vs. 214
Screen detected: 46 vs. 197
Prevalent not detected: 171 vs. 93
Not detectable: 310 vs. 158
Possible aetiology
Segnan et al (2011)5
Italy
Not specifically detailedRCT; 17 136 intervention group of which 9911 attenders; 17 136 controlsCRC incidence and mortality
Intervention group: 251 CRCs;
controls: 306 CRCs
Screen detected: 78 vs. 48; Not screened: 61 vs. 64; Control: 154 vs. 152Screen detected: 55 vs. 71; Not screened: 44 vs. 81; Control: 108 vs. 198N/A
Atkin et al (2010)4
UK
Not specifically detailedMulticentre RCT, screening cohort; 40.674 intervention group, vs. 113.195 control groupCRC incidence and mortality
Intervention group: 706 CRCs; controls 1818 CRCs
Not specifiedIntervention: 311 vs. 386; controls: 628 vs. 1192N/A
Hoff et al (2009)57
Norway
Postscreen detected CRCsRCT screening cohort; 13.653 screened vs. 41.092 controlsCRC incidence: 33 screen detected CRC; 38 postscreen detected CRC; 52 non-attenders; 362 controlsScreen detected: 20 vs. 11; postscreen detected: 6 vs. 29; non-attenders: 7 vs. 38; controls: 62 vs. 262Screen detected: 9 vs. 24; postscreen detected 27 vs.11; non-attenders; controls: 145 vs. 217N/A
  • CRC, colorectal cancer; iCRC, interval CRC; N/A, not applicable; PLCO, Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian.