Table 5

Case examples illustrating the practical applicability of the nomenclature

CaseDescriptionNomenclatureLevel of agreement*
160-year-old female participates in a biennial FIT screening programme.
The first FIT screening episode is negative. The second FIT screening episode is negative. The third FIT screening episode is positive. Subsequent colonoscopy detects a CRC.
FIT screen-detected cancer1=100%;
2=0%;
3=0%;
4=0%;
5=0%
257-year-old male participates in a biennial FIT screening programme.
The first FIT screening episode is negative. One year later, he develops rectal blood loss for which colonoscopy is performed showing a CRC in the rectosigmoid.
FIT interval cancer (within a FIT screening programme)1=100%;
2=0%;
3=0%;
4=0%;
5=0%
364-year-old male, participates in a biennial FIT screening programme.
The first FIT screening episode is positive. Colonoscopy shows no abnormalities. A recommendation is made to participate again in the FIT programme, after 10 years. A colonoscopy performed 4 years later, due to rectal blood loss, reveals a cancer in the rectosigmoid colon.
CS interval cancer (within a FIT screening programme)1=87.5%;
2=12.5%;
3=0%;
4=0%;
5=0%
469-year-old male participates in a primary colonoscopy screening programme. Baseline colonoscopy shows no abnormalities, and repeat screening colonoscopy is recommended after 10 years. However, 6 years later he undergoes colonoscopy due to an iron deficiency anaemia, which reveals a cancer of the caecum.CS interval cancer (within a CS screening programme)1=100%;
2=0%;
3=0%;
4=0%;
5=0%
555-year-old male participates in a once in 5-year FS-screening programme. Baseline FS shows no abnormalities. However, a colonoscopy performed 3 years later due to rectal blood loss shows a cancer in the rectosigmoid colon.FS interval cancer (within a FS screening programme)1=100%;
2=0%;
3=0%;
4=0%;
5=0%
660-year-old male participates in a biennial FIT screening programme.
The first FIT screening episode is positive. Subsequent colonoscopy shows two small adenomas, for which a repeat colonoscopy is recommended after 5 years. However, 3 years later a colonoscopy is performed due to rectal blood loss, which shows a cancer in the rectosigmoid colon.
CS interval cancer (within a FIT screening programme)1=100%;
2=0%;
3=0%;
4=0%;
5=0%
775-year-old male participates in a primary colonoscopy screening programme.
Baseline colonoscopy detects eight adenomas, which are removed, with two of them containing high-grade dysplasia. Surveillance colonoscopy is recommended after 3 years. The patient experiences a coronary event and postpones the examination. Two years later (5 years from the initial colonoscopy), a repeat colonoscopy is performed due to symptoms, which shows a CRC.
This is not an interval CRC, because the detection occurred beyond the recommended interval for repeat testing1=87.5%;
2=12.5%;
3=0%;
4=0%;
5=0%
875-year-old male participates in a primary colonoscopy screening programme.
Baseline colonoscopy detects six adenomas, which are removed, with two of them containing high-grade dysplasia; surveillance colonoscopy is recommended after 3 years. Two years later a colonoscopy is performed due to rectal blood loss, which shows a cancer in the rectosigmoid colon.
CS interval cancer (within a CS screening programme)1=100%;
2=0%;
3=0%;
4=0%;
5=0%
960-year-old female participates in a 5-yearly FS-screening programme. Baseline FS examination shows one small rectal adenoma, which is removed. Subsequent colonoscopy shows no additional neoplasms; surveillance colonoscopy is recommended after 5–10 years. Four years later a colonoscopy is performed for obstructive symptoms, showing a cancer in the rectosigmoid colon.CS interval cancer (within a FS screening programme)1=100%;
2=0%;
3=0%;
4=0%;
5=0%
1055-year-old male participates in a once in 5-year FS screening programme. FS shows no abnormalities. Three years later a colonoscopy is performed due to iron deficiency anaemia, which shows a cancer in the ascending colon.FS interval cancer (within a FS screening programme)1=100%;
2=0%;
3=0%;
4=0%;
5=0%
1158-year-old male underwent a screening colonoscopy, recommended by his general practitioner (opportunistic screening), which showed no abnormalities. A repeat colonoscopy is advised after 10 years. Four years later a colonoscopy is performed because of rectal bleeding, showing a cancer in the sigmoid colon.CS interval cancer (following opportunistic CS screening)1=100%;
2=0%;
3=0%;
4=0%;
5=0%
1255-year-old male underwent a screening colonoscopy (opportunistic screening) showing two tubular adenomas in the sigmoid colon, for which a surveillance colonoscopy is recommended after 5 years. Three years later he is noted to be iron-deficient and colonoscopy demonstrates a cancer in the ascending colon.CS interval cancer (following opportunistic CS screening)1=100%;
2=0%;
3=0%;
4=0%;
5=0%
  • *Level of agreement: 1, accept completely; 2, accept with minor reservation; 3, accept with major reservation; 4, reject with reservation; and 5, reject completely.

  • CRC, colorectal cancer; CS, colonoscopy; FIT, faecal immunochemical test; FS, flexible sigmoidoscopy.