Table 8

Multivariable logistic regression results of inadequate gFOB screening

 1st Biennial invitation round (n=35 734)2nd Biennial invitation round (n=35 766)3rd Biennial invitation round (n=36 540)
OR95% CIOR95% CIOR95% CI
Sociodemographics
 Women1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)
 Men1.260.90 to 1.762.09***1.45 to 3.021.300.92 to 1.84
 IMD score (0–80)1.03***1.02 to 1.051.02**1.00 to 1.031.02**1.01 to 1.04
 Age at 1st invitation (60–64)
  Age 60–611.00 (ref.)
  Age 62–631.060.75 to 1.51
  Age 641.040.55 to 1.96
 Age at 2nd invitation (62–70)
  Age 62–63†1.00 (ref)
  Age 64–651.050.73 to 1.51
  Age 66+1.130.61 to 2.10
 Age at 3rd invitation (63–72)
  Age 64–65‡1.00 (ref)
  Age 66–671.100.76 to 1.57
  Age 68+1.290.69 to 2.39
Previous uptake pattern
 Previous uptake patterns at 2nd invitation
  Previous Responders1.00 (ref)
  Previous Non-Responders6.02***4.25 to 8.52
 Previous uptake patterns at 3rd invitation
  Consistent Screeners1.00 (ref)
  Late Entrants2.86***1.64 to 4.96
  Dropouts4.38***2.52 to 7.60
  Consistent Non-Responders13.45***8.97 to 20.19
  • Listwise deletion was used for the multivariable logistic regression analysis.

  • *p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001.

  • †Includes 61-year-olds turning 62 in the same month (n=1).

  • ‡Includes 63-year-olds turning 64 in the same month (n=2).

  • gFOB, guaiac-based faecal occult blood; IMD, Index of Multiple Deprivation.