Table 9

Multivariable logistic regression results of follow-up compliance

 1st Biennial invitation round (n=424)2nd Biennial invitation round (n=593)3rd Biennial invitation round (n=706)
OR95% CIOR95% CIOR95% CI
Sociodemographics
 Women1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)
 Men0.930.49 to 1.750.910.53 to 1.561.070.68 to 1.69
 IMD score (0–80)1.000.97 to 1.020.980.96 to 1.000.990.98 to 1.01
 Age at 1st invitation (60–64)
  Age 60–611.00 (ref)
  Age 62–630.590.31 to 1.12
  Age 640.680.21 to 2.16
 Age at 2nd invitation (62–70)
  Age 62–63†1.00 (ref)
  Age 64–651.270.74 to 2.17
  Age 66+4.260.99 to 18.29
 Age at 3rd invitation (63–72)
  Age 64–65‡1.00 (ref)
  Age 66–671.170.72 to 1.90
  Age 68+0.720.34 to 1.54
Previous uptake pattern
 Previous uptake patterns at 2nd invitation
  Previous Responders1.00 (ref)
  Previous Non-Responders0.630.36 to 1.09
 Previous uptake patterns at 3rd invitation
  Consistent Screeners1.00 (ref)
  Late Entrants0.760.38 to 1.50
  Dropouts0.44*0.22 to 0.89
  Consistent Non-Responders0.43**0.23 to 0.81
  • Listwise deletion was used for the multivariable logistic regression analysis.

  • *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.

  • †Includes 61-year-olds turning 62 in the same month (n=1).

  • ‡Includes 63-year-olds turning 64 in the same month (n=2).

  • IMD, Index of Multiple Deprivation.