Summary of literature on IEL counts
Study | Methods | Number of biopsies | Upper range | Comments |
Ferguson and Murray5 | H&E staining, IEL/100 enterocytes, 7 µm sections | 40 | 40 | Used controls, coeliac & autoimmune conditions, incorrect about normally distributed IEL, highest IEL count recorded: 155 |
Batman et al14 | H&E staining, 5 µm sections | 8 | 33 | Study of HIV enteropathy |
Hayat et al12 | H&E staining, 4 µm sections | 20 | 25 | Counts made on uninterrupted length of epithelium >500 EC, controls defined only by a ‘normal’ sugar permeability |
Mahadeva et al15 | H&E staining, 3 µm sections | 29 | 22 | Major interest in normal villi with IEL infiltrate. Really difficult to infer group numbers here |
Kakar et al16 | H&E staining | 12 | 39 | Interest in normal villi with IEL infiltrates |
Veress et al11 | H&E staining, 3 µm CD3+ | 64 | H&E: 20 CD3+: 5–9 | In H&E sections, if IEL to EC ratio >5:1, do CD3 count |
Biagi et al13 | H&E staining | 17 | 45 | Major interest in promoting villous tip counts |
Lähdeaho et al30 | H&E staining | 76 | 26 | No reasons given for this cut-off value: referred to Ferguson and Murray5 and Kuitunen et al31 who give no reference range |
Nasseri-Moghaddam et al18 | H&E staining, CD45+ cells | 46 | H&E: 46 CD45+: 47 | Establishing normal criteria by histology and immunocytology |
Siriweera et al32 | H&E staining | 75 | 8 | Retrospective study on 38 control and 37 coeliac specimens. Inexplicably small upper ranges for both groups |
Notes: Here are tabulated some of the principal papers concerned with IEL counts in normal and diseased intestinal mucosae. Once identified in this way, it comes as a surprise that our perceptions of normality and of the accepted distinctions between normal and abnormal are so precariously based. Furthermore, the emphasis in some papers has been on the abnormal (HIV enteropathy), or with reference to a specific aspect (such as villus tip IEL), whereas in others, the actual numbers of patients are unclear, or a worked mean IEL±SD is not given. The very small size of some of the groups analysed should also be noted, since that has a major impact on the statistical ranges and confidence limits offered as diagnostic (with permission from Marsh & Heal.22,
EC. epithelial cells; IEL, intraepithelial lymphocytes.