Table 4

Pooled-analysis of AID-1 (n=685) and AID-2 (n=660) data: results from a two-level logistic regression model with adenoma detection as the outcome and patient’s characteristics (ie, age, gender, colonoscopy indication) and endoscopist’s experience as the regression

Adenoma detection rateAdvanced neoplasia detection rate
VariablesComparisonRR95% CIRR95% CI
Study armControl group11
CADe1.291.16 to 1.421.130.84 to 1.50
Age (years)As continuous variable, mean centering1.031.02 to 1.041.041.02 to 1.05
GenderFemale11
Male1.341.20 to 1.481.320.98 to 1.75
Colonoscopy indicationFIT+11
Surveillance1.010.85 to 1.170.380.24 to 0.59
Screening0.760.60 to 0.930.430.26 to 0.67
Diagnostic0.770.62 to 0.940.340.21 to 0.56
ExperienceExperienced11
Non-experienced1.020.89 to 1.161.370.97 to 1.91
Random part Estimate 95% CI Estimate 95% CI
Between colonoscopist standard deviation (null model)0.200.03 to 0.410.150.19 to 0.70
Intraclass correlation coefficient0.010.050.05
  • CADe, computer-aided detection; FIT, faecal immunochemical test; RR, relative risk.