Table 1

Demographics and clinical parameters of patients with SC, CD and AD and HCs

ParameterHCs (n=20)SC (n=28)CD (n=20)AD (n=50)
Age—years38.00 (32.00–50.50)58.00† (49.50–63.50)55.50† (47.25–62.00)49.50 (42.00–58.00)
Gender—n (%)
Male14/20 (70%)21/28 (75%)14/20 (70%)37/50 (74%)
Female6/20 (30%)7/28 (25%)6/20 (30%)13/50 (26%)
Aetiology—n (%)
 Alcoholic liver disease (ALD)NA19/28 (67.8%)12/20 (60%)32/50 (64%)
 Hepatitis C**NA2/28 (7.14%)3/50 (6%)
 Hepatitis C+ALDNA1/50 (2%)
 Autoimmune hepatitisNA2/20 (10%)2/50 (4%)
 NAFLDNA3/28 (10.7%)6/50 (12%)
 CryptogenicNA3/28 (10.7%)3/50 (6%)
 Other††NA1/28 (3.5%)6/20 (30%)3/50 (6%)
White cell count—×109/LNA4.65‡*** (3.75–6.03)4.415§*** (2.648–6.155)8.52‡***§*** (6.30–15.14)
Neutrophils—×109/LNA2.92‡*** (2.10–4.20)2.50§*** (1.88–4.01)6.20‡***§*** (3.78–10.52)
Monocytes—×109/LNA0.410‡*** (0.30–0.60)0.33§*** (0.21–0.487)0.87‡***§*** (0.47–1.20)
Lymphocytes—×109/LNA1.19 (0.82–1.61)0.93 (0.70–1.41)1.10 (1.57–0.61)
MELD scoreNA10.90‡***¶* (7.85–15.68)16.53¶* (10.92–23.13)26.10‡*** (15.8–33.00)
SOFA score (CLIF-SOFA score in ACLF)NANA3.50§*** (3.00–4.00)12.00§*** (8.50–14.50)
CLIF AD score (in AD)
CLIF ACLF (in ACLF)
NANANA54.50 (45.75–62.13)
58.90 (52.00–64.10)
Child-Pugh scoreNA8.00‡*** (6.00–9.00)8.50§** (7.00–10.00)11.00‡***§** (9.00–12.00)
Creatinine—µmol/LNA72.00¶*** (57.75–88.75)66.50§***¶*** (54.00–88.75)78.50*** (58.5–131.8)
Bilirubin—µmol/LNA26.5¶*** (16.50–50.25)2.54§***¶*** (1.50–7.58)59.00§*** (26.0–154.0)
CRP—mg/LNA5.05‡*** (2.40–15.58)13.60§*** (6.60–17.80)33.80‡***§*** (16.90–68.00)
INRNA1.28‡*** (1.10–1.60)1.36§* (1.190–1.783)1.72‡***§* (1.46–2.02)
Ammonia—µmol/LNAND56.00§*** (46.00–111.0)133.80§*** (126.0–136.0)
Type of precipitating events—n (%)‡‡
 GI bleed19 (38%)
 Infection13 (26%)
 Acute alcohol injuryNANANA3 (6%)
 Any of the events in combination7 (14%)
 Unknown8 (16%)
Number of precipitating events—n (%)
 135 (70%)
 ≥27 (14%)
Mortality from enrolment—n (%)NANANA24 (48%)
90-day mortality
  • Values represent medians (IQR) unless otherwise stated.

  • Multiple comparison testing between more than two groups was carried out using Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s test post hoc intergroup comparison. Mann-Whitney U test used for comparison between two groups.

  • *P<0.0005 and ***p<0.0001.

  • †Significant differences in age compared with HCs, p=0.0005.

  • ‡Comparison between AD and SC.

  • §Comparison between AD and CD.

  • ¶Comparison between SC and CD.

  • **Treated hepatitis C.

  • ††Other aetiologies include Wilson’s disease, Alagille syndrome, chronic Budd-Chiari syndrome and primary sclerosing cholangitis.

  • ‡‡Numbers and percentages presented are in GI bleed alone versus infection alone versus acute alcohol injury alone. Seven patients (14%) had more than one type of event (three patients presented with infection and GI bleed/two with acute alcohol injury and infection, one with GI bleed and acute alcohol injury and one with the three precipitating events).

  • ACLF, acute-on-chronic-liver failure; AD, acute decompensation of cirrhosis; CD, chronic decompensated cirrhosis; CLIF-SOFA, chronic liver failure-sequential organ failure assessment; CRP, C reactive protein; HCs, healthy controls; INR, international normalised ratio; MELD, model for end-stage liver disease; NA, not applicable; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; ND, not determined; SC, stable cirrhosis.