Table 2

FIT diagnostic accuracy for CRC at a cut-off of 10 µg/g in the early diagnostic accuracy studies prior to 2017

RegionDesignnAnalyserReference standardCRC sensitivity
@ 10 µg/g
CRC specificity
@ 10 µg/g
CRC PPV
@ 10 µg/g
CRC NPV
@ 10 µg/g
Terharr sive Droste et al144HollandDTA2058OC-SensorColonoscopy91.1%
(84.2% to 95.6%)
87.0%
(85.4% to 83.5%)
99.4%
(98.9% to 99.7%)
McDonald et al68UK (Scotland)DTA280OC-SensorColonoscopy100%
(54.1% to 100%)
93.8%
(90.3% to 96.3%)
100%
(98.5% to 100%)
Rodríguez-Alonso et al145SpainDTA1003OC-SensorColonoscopy96.7%
(82.8% to 99.9%)
79.9%
(77.2% to 82.3%)
12.8%
(9.1% to 17.9%)
99.9%
(99.3% to 100%)
Mowat et al64UK (Scotland)DTA750OC-SensorColonoscopy89.3%
(71.8% to 97.7%)
79.1%
(75.9% to 82.0%
14.2%
(9.8% to 20.1%)
99.5%
(98.5% to 99.8%)
Godber et al70UK (Scotland)DTA484HM-JACKarcColonoscopy100%
(71.5% to 100%)
76.6%
(72.6% to 80.3%)
9%
(5.1% to 15.4%)
100%
(99.0% to 100%)
  • 95% CIs given in brackets when reported.

  • CRC, colorectal cancer; DTA, diagnostic test accuracy study; FIT, faecal immunochemical testing; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.