Table 4

FIT diagnostic accuracy for CRC at a cut-off of 10 µg/g in patients with high-risk symptoms in the largest and most relevant studies

RegionDesignSymptomsnAnalyserReference standardCRC sensitivity
@ 10 µg/g
CRC specificity
@ 10 µg/g
CRC PPV
@ 10 µg/g
CRC NPV
@ 10 µg/g
NICE FIT
202128
UK (England)DTANG127194HM-JACKarcColonoscopy92.2%
(88.2% to 95.2%)
82.3%
(81.2% to 83.2%)
16.2%
(14.3% to 18.2%)
99.7%
(99.5% to 99.8%)
Turvill et al 29 UK (England)DTAAll5040HM-JACKarcVarious87.4%
(81.0% to 92.3%)
80.9%
(79.7% to 81.9%)
12.4%
(10.4% to 14.5%)
99.5%
(99.3% to 99.7%)
qFIT
202162
UK (England)DTANG123596OC-SensorVarious83.3%
(75.6% to 91.0%)
80.1%
(78.9% to 81.4%)
9.7%
(7.6% to 11.8%)
99.5%
(99.1% to 99.7%)
McSorley et al 31 UK (Scotland)SEAll4841HM-JACKarcColonoscopy94.7%
(91% to 97%)
47%
(46% to 48%)
9.4%
(8.4% to 10.6%)
99.4%
(98.9% to 99.6%)
Mowat et al 18 UK (Scotland)SEAll5381HM-JACKarcVarious86.7%
(78.6% to 92.5%)
79.4%
(78.3% to 80.5%)
7.7%
(7.1% to 8.4%)
99.7%
(99.5% to 99.8%)
Pin Vieito et al 21 SpainSEAll5623OC-SensorVarious81.3%
(71.3% to 88.3%)
84.1%
(83.1% to 85.1%)
6.9%
(5.4% to 8.7%)
99.7%
(99.5% to 99.8%)
Chapman et al 75 UK (England)DTANG12732OC-SensorColonoscopy89%
(75% to 97%)
74%
(70% to 77%)
16%
(11% to 21%)
99%
(98% to 100%)
HM-JACKarc84%
(69% to 94%)
78%
(75% to 81%)
18%
(12% to 24%)
99%
(98% to 100%)
Farrugia et al 73 UK (England)DTANG12519HM-JACKarcColonoscopy / CTC84.9%
(68.1% to 94.9%)
81.3%
(77.5% to 84.65%)
23.6%
(19.6% to 28%)
98.8%
(97.2% to 99.4%)
D’Souza
2020
UK (England)DTANG12160HM-JACKarcColonoscopy87.5%
(52.9% to 97.8%)
84.2%
(77.6% to 89.2%)
22.6%
(11.4% to 39.8%)
99.2%
(95.7% to 99.9%)
Khan
et al 78
UK (England)DTANG12928HM-JACKarcVarious85.1%
(71% to 93.3%)
83.5%
(80.8% to 85.8%)
22.6%
(16% to 28.3%)
99%
(97.9% to 99.5%)
Nicholson et al 27 UK (England)SEAll9896HM-JACKarcRecord linkage90.5%
(84.9% to 96.1%)
91.3%
(90.8% to 91.9%)
10.1%
(8.15% to 12.0%)
99.9%
(99.8% to 100.0%)
Herrero et al 36 SpainSEAll1572OC-SensorColonoscopy93.5%
(89.1% to 96.3%)
63.4%
(60.7% to 66.0%)
28.9%
(25.6% to 32.4%)
98.4%
(97.2% to 99.1%)
Widlak et al 82 UK (England)DTAAll562HM-JACKarcColonoscopy / CTC80.0%
(66% to 93%)
93%
(91% to 95%)
44.0%
(32% to 56%)
99.0%
(98% to 100%)
Arraez et al 76 SpainDTAIDA245OC-SensorColonoscopy92.9%
(76.5% to 99.1%)
57.1%
(50.3% to 63.8%)
21.8%
(15.4% to 30.1%)
98.4%
(96.2% to 100%)
Khasawneh et al 14 UK (England)DTACIBH5818OC-SensorCTC88.9%
(79.6% to 94.3%)
80.8%
(79.7% to 81.8%)
5.5%
(4.3% to 6.9%)
99.8%
(99.7% to 99.9%)
  • 95% CIs given in brackets when reported.

  • CIBH, change in bowel habit; CRC, colorectal cancer; DTA, diagnostic test accuracy study; FIT, faecal immunochemical testing; IDA, iron deficiency anaemia; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; SE, service evaluation; SR, systematic review and meta-analysis.