Skip to main content
Log in

Flexible sigmoidoscopy may be ineffective for secondary prevention of colorectal cancer in asymptomatic, average-risk men

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Asymptomatic men (N=114) 50 years of age or older had screening for colorectal neoplasia with flexible sigmoidoscopy followed by colonoscopy regardless of the sigmoidoscopic result. Our study objective was to determine the prevalence of patients having isolated adenomatous polyps in a proximal colonic segment in the absence of a distal index neoplasm within reach of the sigmoidoscope. Through the combined use of sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy, adenomatous polyps were detected in 47 of 114 individuals (41%). A total of 88 adenomas was found. Seventeen patients had isolated neoplasms in proximal colonic segments in the absence of distal adenomas. These patients represented 15% of screened subjects (17 of 114) and 20% of individuals who lacked adenomas on sigmoidoscopy (17 of 84). The majority of proximal neoplasms were small (<1.0 cm), tubular adenomas. Flexible sigmoidoscopy may be ineffective for screening asymptomatic men for neoplasia. However, it remains to be determined if a 20% miss rate (for those with a normal sigmoidoscopic examination) is significant and whether small proximal adenomas are worth finding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sherlock P, Winawer SJ: Are there markers for the risk of colorectal cancer? N Engl J Med 311:118–119, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Cancer Society: Cancer of the colon and rectum. Ca 30:208–215, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lambert R, Sobin LH, Waye JD, et al: The management of patients with colorectal adenomas. Ca 34:167–176, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fleischer DE, Goldberg SB, Browning TH, et al: Detection and surveillance of colorectal cancer. JAMA 261:580–585, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blatt LJ: Polyps of the colon and rectum: Incidence and distribution. Dis Colon Rectum 4:277–282, 1961

    Google Scholar 

  6. Arminski TC, McLean DW: Incidence and distribution of adenomatous polyps of the colon and rectum based on 1000 autopsy examinations. Dis Colon Rectum 7:249–261, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eide TJ, Stalsberg H: Polyps of the large intestine in northern Norway. Cancer 42:2829–2848, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rickert RR, Auerbach O, Garfinkel L, Hammond EC, Frasca JM: Adenomatous lesions of the large bowel: An autopsy survey. Cancer 43:1847–1851, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  9. Williams AR, Balasooriya BAW, Day DW: Polyps and cancer of the large bowel: A necropsy study in Liverpool. Gut 23:835–842, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  10. MaCrae FA, St John DJ: Relationship between patterns of bleeding and Hemoccult sensitivity in patients with colorectal cancers or adenomas. Gastroenterology 82:891–898, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  11. Letsou G, Ballantyne GH, Zdon MJ, Zucker KA, Modlin IM: Screening for colorectal neoplasms: A comparison of the fecal occult blood test and endoscopic examination. Dis Colon Rectum 30:839–843, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  12. Foutch PG, Manne RK, Sanowski RA, Gaines JA: Risk factors for blood loss from adenomatous polyps of the large bowel: A colonoscopic evaluation with histopathological correlation. J Clin Gastroenterol 10:50–56, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  13. Knight KK, Fielding JE, Battista RN: Occult blood screening for colorectal cancer. JAMA 261:587–593, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  14. World Health Organization: Histological typing of intestinal tumors.In International Histological Classification of Tumors, Vol 15. BC Morson, LH Sobin, (eds.):, Geneva, WHO, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  15. Correa P, Strong JP, Reif A, Johnson WD: The epidemiology of colorectal polyps: Prevalence in New Orleans and international comparisons. Cancer 39:2258–2264, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vatn MN, Stalsberg H: The prevalence of polyps of the large intestine in Oslo: An autopsy study. Cancer 49:819–825, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  17. Burt RW, Samowitz WS: The adenomatous polyp and the hereditary polyposis syndromes. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 17:657–678, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  18. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination: The periodic health examination: 2. 1989 Update. Can Med Assoc J 141:209–216, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  19. Neugut AI, Pita S: Role of sigmoidoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer: A critical review. Gastroenterology 95:492–499, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ujszaszy L, Pronay G, Nagy G, et al: Screening for colorectal cancer in a Hungarian county. Endoscopy 17:109–112, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yarborough GW, Waisbren BA: The benefits of systematic fiberoptic flexible sigmoidoscopy. Arch Intern Med 145:95–96, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  22. Frame PS: Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: Is it worth-while? An opposing view. J Fam Pract 25:604–607, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  23. Selby JV, Friedman GD: Sigmoidoscopy in the periodic health examination of asymptomatic adults. JAMA 261:595–601 1989

    Google Scholar 

  24. Konishi F, Morson BC: Pathology of colorectal adenomas: A colonoscopic survey. J Clin Pathol 35:830–841, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  25. Warden MJ, Petrelli NJ, Herrera L, Mittelman A: The role of colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy in screening for colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 30:52–54, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  26. Achkar E, Carey W: Small polyps found during fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy in asymptomatic patients. Ann Intern Med 109:880–883, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  27. Health and Public Safety Committee, American College of Physicians: Clinical competence in colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 107:772–774, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  28. Foutch PG, Mai HD, Pardy K, et al: The index hyperplastic polyp is a reliable marker for synchronous neoplasia in the proximal colon. Gastrointest Endosc 36:212, 1990 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Muto T, Bussey HJR, Morson BC: The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 36:2251–2270, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  30. Winawer SJ, Sherlock P: Surveillance for colorectal cancer in average-risk patients, familial high-risk groups and patients with adenomas. Cancer 50:2609–2614, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  31. O'Brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, et al: The National Polyp Study: Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology 98:371–379, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  32. DiSario JA, Foutch PG, Manne RK: Colorectal adenomas: Factors associated with higher grades of dysplasia in asymptomatic, average risk men. Am J Gastroenterol 85:1275, 1990 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rex D, Lehman G, Hawes R, Ulbright TM, Smith JJ: Screening colonoscopy in asymptomatic average risk persons with negative fecal occult blood tests. Gastroenterology 100:64–67, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lieberman D, Smith F: Screening asymptomatic subjects for colon malignancy with colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 98:A294, 1990

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foutch, P.G., Mai, H., Pardy, K. et al. Flexible sigmoidoscopy may be ineffective for secondary prevention of colorectal cancer in asymptomatic, average-risk men. Digest Dis Sci 36, 924–928 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01297142

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01297142

Key Words

Navigation