Abstract
Although the most sensitive and specific test for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease, normal standards for prolonged esophageal pH monitoring are based on small sample sizes with questions raised about the effects of pH electrode, older age, gender, and methods of data analysis on pH variables. Recently three groups have established normal data bases using similar methodology. Multiple regression and nonparametric analyses showed that the values for the six traditional pH parameters were comparable across study centers. Therefore, the groups were combined for a total study population of 110 healthy subjects (47 men, 63 women, mean age 38 years with a range of 20–84 years). Further nonparametric analyses revealed the following: (1) type of pH electrode (antimony vs glass) is not significantly related to parameters of physiologic acid reflux; (2) age is not independently related to pH parameters; (3) men tend to have more physiologic reflux than women; and (4) older men tend to experience longer episodes of reflux than younger men and women. There was a significant effect of gender and a significant interaction between age and gender on the number of episodes >5 min (P=0.008). Nearly significant differences were found for percentage of total acid exposure time (P=0.03), total reflux episodes (P=0.02), and the longest reflux episode (P=0.02). We believe these normal esophageal pH values can be used confidently as standards in any laboratory, and consideration should be given to developing separate standards for men and women.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Miller FA: Utilization of inlaying pH probe for evaluation of acid-peptic diathesis. Arch Surg 89:199–203, 1964
Rosen SN, Pope CE II: Extended esophageal pH monitoring. An analysis of the literature and assessment of its role in the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 11:260–270, 1989
Johnson LF, DeMeester TR: Advantage of distal esophageal 24-hour pH monitoring over other tests for gastroesophageal reflux. Gastroenterology 66:716A, 1974
Euler AR, Byrne WJ: Twenty-four hour esophageal intraluminal pH probe testing: a comparative analysis. Gastroenterology 80:957–961, 1981
Roth A, Gars R, Bettex M: Significance of esophageal manometry and long-term pH monitoring for the evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux in infancy and childhood. Prog Pediatr Surg 18:22–31, 1985
Stanciu C, Hoare RC, Bennett JR: Correlation between manometric and pH tests for gastro-oesophageal reflux. Gut 18:536–540, 1977
Irvin TT, Perez-Avila C: Diagnosis of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux by prolonged monitoring of lower esophageal pH. Scand J Gastroenterol 127:115–120, 1977
Branicki FJ, Evans DF, Jones JA, Ogilvie AL, Atkinson M, Hardcastle JD: A frequency-duration index (FDI) for the evaluation of ambulatory recordings of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Br J Surg 71:425–430, 1984
Spence RAJ, Johnston GW, Parks TG: Prolonged ambulatory pH monitoring in patients following oesophageal transection and control subjects. Br J Surg 72:99–101, 1985
Vitale GC, Sadek S, Tulley FM, Rimmer AR, Hunter BE, Phelan J, Casahieri A: Computerized 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring: A new ambulatory technique using radiotelemetry. J Lab Clin Med 105:686–693, 1985
Schlesinger PK, Donahue PE, Schmid B, Layden TJ: Limitations of 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring in the hospital setting. Gastroenterology 89:797–804, 1985
Schindlebeck NE, Heinrich C, Konig A, Dendorfer A, Pace F, Muller-Lissner SA: Optimal thresholds, sensitivity and specificity of long-term pH-metry for the detection of gastroesophageal reflux. Gastroenterology 93:85–90, 1987
Smout AJPM, Breedijk M, Van der Zouw C, Akkermans LMA: Physiological gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal motor activity studied with a new system for 24-hour recording and automated analysis. Dig Dis Sci 34:372–378, 1989
Johnsson F, Joelsson B, Isberg PE: Ambulatory 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gut 25:1145–1156, 1987
MacLauchlan G, Rawlings JM, Lucas ML, McCloy RF, Crean GP, McColl KEL: Electrodes for 24-hour pH monitoring—a comparative study. Gut 28:935–939, 1987
Johnson LF, DeMeester TR: Twenty-four hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 62:325–332, 1974
Hartley HO: The maximum F-ratio as a short-cut test for heterogeneity of variance. Biometrika 37:308–312, 1950
Lipton A, Harvey HA, Balch C: C-paquum vs BCG adjuvant immunotherapy of stage II malignant melanoma. J Clin Oncol 1990 (in press)
Cohen J, Cohen P: Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1975
Spence RAJ, Collins BJ, Parks TG, Love AHG: Does age influence normal gastro-oesophageal reflux. Gut 26:799–801, 1985
Kruse-Andersen S, Wallin L, Madsen T: The influence of age on esophageal acid defense mechanisms and spontaneous acid gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 83:637–639, 1988
Feldman M: Gastric secretion.In Gastrointestinal Disease. MH Sleisinger, JS Fordtran, (eds). Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1983, pp 545–547
Baron JH: Lean body mass, gastric acid and peptic ulcer. Gut 637–642, 1969
Cox AJ: Stomach size and its relation to chronic peptic ulcer. JAMA 54:407–410, 1952
Hollis JB, Castell DO: Esophageal function in elderly men. A new look at “presbyesophagus.” Ann Intern Med 80:371–374, 1974
Richter JE, Wu WC, Johns DN, Blackwell JN, Nelson JL, Castell JA, Castell DO: Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers. Variability of pressures with age and frequency of “abnormal” contractions. Dig Dis Sci 32:583–592, 1987
Emde C, Garner A, Blum AL: Technical aspects of intraluminal pH-metry in man: current status and recommendations. Gut 28:1177–1188, 1987
A Gallup survey of heartburn across America. Princeton, New Jersey, The Gallup Organization, 1988
Nebel OT, Fornes MF, Castell DO: Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux: Incidence and precipitating factors. Am J Dig Dis 21:953–957, 1976
Wiener GJ, Morgan TM, Cooper JB, Wu WC, Castell DO, Sinclair JW, Richter JE: Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Reproducibility and variability of pH parameters. Dig Dis Sci 33:1127–1133, 1988
Murphy DW, Yuan Y, Castell DO: Does the intraesophageal pH probe accurately detect acid reflux? Dig Dis Sci 34:649–656, 1989
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Richter, J.E., Bradley, L.A., DeMeester, T.R. et al. Normal 24-Hr ambulatory esophageal pH values. Digest Dis Sci 37, 849–856 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01300382
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01300382