Skip to main content
Log in

Bleeding after liver biopsy does not correlate with indices of peripheral coagulation

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contraindications for percutaneous liver biopsy are often derived arbitrarily from coagulation status of peripheral blood, but no objective data are available on the duration of bleeding from the site of liver biopsy. “Liver bleeding time” (LBT) was measured after liver biopsy had been performed at laparoscopy in 200 consecutive patients using a 1.8-mm-diameter Menghini needle. LBT was then analyzed in relation to prothrombin time, platelet count, whole blood clot time, length of biopsy cylinder, and liver histopathology. There was no correlation among any of these variables. The average LBT was 4 min 37 sec±3 min 48 sec (sd). In 10 patients LBT was prolonged over 12 min\((\bar X \pm 2SD)\), but their clotting indices were not different from those of other patients. Bleeding could be stopped easily by compression if necessary. This lack of correlation may be explained by the high concentration of clotting factors in hepatic parenchyma and by mechanical compression of the needle track by the elastic tissue in the liver. It is concluded that indices of coagulation in the peripheral blood used in this study are unreliable guides of the risk of bleeding after liver biopsy and, hence, are of limited value in determining contraindications to this procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Isselbacher KJ, LaMont JT: Diagnostic procedures in liver diseases.In Principles of Internal Medicine, TR Harrison (ed). New York, McGraw-Hill, 1977, pp 1580–1584

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sherlock S: Diseases of the Liver and Biliary System, 5th ed. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  3. Menghini G, Ghergo GF: needle biopsy of the liver.In Gastroenterology, Vol III. HL Bockus (ed). Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders, 1976, pp 88–112

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edmondson HA, Schiff L: Needle biopsy of the liver.In Diseases of the Liver, 4th ed, L Schiff (ed). Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott 1975, pp 247–263

    Google Scholar 

  5. Terry R: Risks of Needle biopsy of the liver. Br Med J 1:1102–1105, 1952

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thaler H: Über Vorteil und Risiko der Leberbiopsiemethode nach Menghini. Wien Med Wochenschr 76:533–538, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lindner H: Grenzen und Gefahren der perkutanen Leberbiopsie mit der Menghininadel. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 92:1751–1757, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  8. Paliord P, Patricot F, Grimond JA: Les alterations histologiques des hepatites grave et leur evolution. A propos de 45 observations suivies par biopsies. Ann Gastroenterol Hepat 8:133–150, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  9. Scotto J, Opolon P, Eteve J, Vergoz D, Thomas M, Caroli J: Liver biopsy and prognosis in acute liver failure. Gut 14:927–933, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dammermann R, Budweg A, Garbe W, Gestefeld K, Grote W, Seevers HH: Abhängigkeit der Nachblutung nach Leberbiopsien von dem Nadelkaliber.In Fortschritte gastroenterologische Endoskopie, H Henning (ed). Baden-Baden, Witzstrock Verlag, 1978, pp 131–132

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ewe, K. Bleeding after liver biopsy does not correlate with indices of peripheral coagulation. Digest Dis Sci 26, 388–393 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01313579

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01313579

Keywords

Navigation