Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of intraesophageal location and muscarinic blockade on balloon distension-induced chest pain

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intraesophageal balloon distension has been introduced recently as a provocative test in the assessment of patients with noncardiac chest pain. In order to examine the effect of balloon location and muscarinic blockade on distension-induced pain, 10 asymptomatic male volunteers were studied on two separate days using a low-compliance perfused manometry system that incorporated a silicone rubber balloon. Five-second-duration balloon distensions using balloon volumes of 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 ml of air were performed with the balloon located both 16 cm (proximal site) and 6 cm (distal site) above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) before and after administration of atropine (10 μg/kg intravenously) or placebo in a randomized double-blind fashion. A standardized scoring system was used to assess the balloon distension-induced pain. Pain scores varied directly with balloon volume but were consistently higher with the balloon located at the proximal site versus the distal site. This was not associated with any differences in intraballoon pressures between the two sites; however, contraction amplitude orad to the balloon was greater with balloon distension at the proximal site. Atropine significantly decreased pain sensation scores with the balloon located distally but not proximally. This attenuation was not associated with significant changes in intraballoon pressures; howver, contractions orad to the balloon were markedly inhibited by atropine with distal but not with proximal distension. These studies indicate that balloon distension-induced pain varies depending on the location of distension. This difference is not explained by differences in esophageal wall tension at the site of distension. The observation that atropine decreases balloon distension-induced pain in the distal esophagus suggests that smooth muscle contraction at least partly contributes to pain sensation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Richter JE, Bradley LA, Castell DO: Esophageal chest pain: Current controversies in pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy. Ann Intern Med 110:66–78, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ockene IS, Shay MJ, Alpert JS, Weiner BH, Dalen JE: Uhexplained chest pain in patients with normal coronary arteriograms: A follow-up study of functional status. N Engl J Med 303:1249–1252, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  3. Soffer EE, Scalabrini P, Wingate DL: Spontaneous noncardiac chest pain: Value of ambulatory esophageal pH and motility monitoring. Dig Dis Sci 34:1651–1655, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Caestecker JS, Pryde A, Heading RC: Comparison of intravenous edrophonium and oesophageal acid perfusion during oesophageal manometry in patients with non-cardiac chest pain. Gut 29:1029–1034, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benjamin SB, Richter JE, Cordova CM, Knuff TE, Castell DO: Prospective manometric evaluation with pharmacologic provocation of patients with suspected esophageal motility dysfunction. Gastroenterology 84:893–901, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee CA, Reynolds JC, Ouyang A, Baker L, Cohen S: Esophageal chest pain: Value of high-dose provocative testing with edrophonium chloride in patients with normal esophageal manometries. Dig Dis Sci 32:682–688, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  7. Katz PO, Dalton CB, Richter JE, Wu WC, Castell DO: Esophageal testing of patients with noncardiac chest pain or dysphagia. Ann Intern Med 106:593–597, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nostrant TT, Sams J, Huber T: Bethanechol increases the diagnostic yield in patients with esophageal chest pain. Gastroenterology 91:1141–1146, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  9. Richter JE, Barish CF, Castell DO: Abnormal sensory perception in patients with esophageal chest pain. Gastroenterology 91:845–852, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barish CF, Castell DO, Richter JE: Graded esophageal balloon distension. A new provocative test for noncardiac chest pain. Dig Dis Sci 31:1292–1298, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  11. Richter JE, Wu WC, Johns DN, Blackwell JN, Nelson III JL, Castell JA, Castell DO: Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers. Dig Dis Sci 32:583–592, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  12. Treacy WL, Baggenstoss AH, Slocum CH, Code CF: Scleroderma of the esophagus. A correlation of histologic and physiologic findings. Ann Intern Med 59:351–356, 1963

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rodrigo J, Hernandez CJ, Vidal MA, Pedrose JA: Vegetative innervation of the esophagus. II. Intraganglionic laminar endings. Acta Anat 92:79–100, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  14. Falempin M, Rousseau JP: Reinnervation of skeletal muscles by vagal sensory fibres in the sheep, cat and rabbit. J Physiol London 335:467–479, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  15. Paterson WG: Neuromuscular mechanisms of esophageal responses at and proximal to a distending balloon. Am J Physiol 260 (Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 23), 1991 (in press)

  16. Barish CF, Richter JE, Blackwell JN, Castell DO: Pharmacologic testing of esophageal muscle wall response to balloon dilatation in primates. Gastroenterology 86:1020, 1984

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by grant MA-9978 from the Medical Research Council of Canada. Dr. Paterson is a recipient of an Ontario Ministry of Health Career Scientist Award.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paterson, W.G., Selucky, M. & Hynna-Liepert, T.T. Effect of intraesophageal location and muscarinic blockade on balloon distension-induced chest pain. Digest Dis Sci 36, 282–288 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01318197

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01318197

Key words

Navigation