Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of loperamide on anal sphincter function in patients complaining of chronic diarrhea with fecal incontinence and urgency

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have investigated the effect of loperamide (4 mg tds) on the continence to a standard volume of rectally infused saline and anorectal manometry in 26 patients complaing of chronic diarrhea complicated by fecal incontinence and severe urgency. Each patient was treated for one week with loperamide (4 mg tds) and for one week with an identical placebo in a double-blind cross-over trial. Our results showed that as well as its established effects of improving stool consistency and reducing stool weight, frequency and episodes of incontinence and severe urgency, loperamide also significantly improved continence to a standard volume of rectally infused saline. This action was associated with an increase in the maximum basal sphincter pressure, an increase in the rectal volume required to abolish recovery of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex, and a reduction in rectal compliance. These results suggest that loperamide may have a specific action on the anal sphincter, which may aid continence in patients who complain of diarrhea and fecal incontinence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parks AG: Anorectal incontinence. Proc R Soc Med 68:681–690, 1975

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cerulli MA, Nikoomanesh P, Schuster MM: Progress in biofeedback conditioning for fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 76:742–746, 1979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. MacLeod JH: Biofeedback in the management of partial anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 22:169–171, 1979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Palmer KR, Corbett CL, Holdsworth CD: Double-blind cross-over study comparing loperamide, codeine and diphenoxylate in the treatment of chronic diarrhea. Gastroenterology 79:1272–1275, 1980

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Manning AP, Thompson WG, Heaton KW, Morris AF: Towards positive diagnosis of the irritable bowel. Br Med J 2(6138):653–654, 1978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Koelz HR, Brandli HH, Blum AL: Simple perfusion pump for gastrointestinal manometry. Lancet 2(7944):1075, 1975

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Read NW, Harford WV, Schmulen AC, Read MG, Santa Ana C, Fordtran JS: A clinical study of patients with fecal incontinence and diarrhea. Gastroenterology 76:747–756, 1979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schuster MM, Hendrix TR, Mendeloff AI: The internal anal sphincter response: Manometric studies on its normal physiology, neural pathways and alteration in bowel diseases. J Clin Invest 42:196–207, 1963

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pimparkar BD, Tulsky EG, Kalser MH, Bockus HL: Correlation of radioactive and chemical fecal fat determinations in the malabsorption syndrome. I. Studies in normal man and in functional disorders of the gastrointestinal tract. Am J Med 30:910–926, 1961

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rendtorff RC, Kashgarian M: Stool patterns of healthy adult males. Dis Colon Rectum 10:222–228, 1967

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Burkitt DP, Walker ARP, Painter NS: Effect of dietary fibre on stools and transit times and its role in the causation of disease. Lancet 2:1408–1411, 1972

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harford WV, Krejs GJ, Santa Ana C, Fordtran JS: Acute effect of diphenoxylate with atropine (Lomotil) in patients with chronic diarrhea and fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 78:440–443, 1980

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jaffe JH, Martin WR: Narcotic analgesics and antagonists.In The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, LS Goodman, A. Gilman (eds). New York: Macmillan, 1975, p. 235

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yagasaki O, Suzuki H, Sohji Y: Effects of loperamide on acetylcholine and prostaglandin release from isolated guinea-pig ileum. Jpn J Pharmacol 28:873–882, 1978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gutierrez JG, Oliai A, Shah A, Chey WY: Studies on the mechanical and electrical activity of the internal anal sphincter in man: Cholinergic control and effects of secretin and CCK. Gastroenterology 68(A51):908, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  16. Burleigh DE, D'Mello A, Parks AG: Responses of isolated human internal anal sphincter to drugs and electrical field stimulation. Gastroenterology 77:484–489, 1979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McKirdy HC: Effect of loperamide on human isolated internal anal sphincter. Proc Physiol Soc C16:20–21, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  18. Niemegeers CJE, McGuire JL, Heykauts JJP, Janssen PAJ: Experimental dissociation between opiate-like and antidiarrhoeal activities of antidiarrhoeal drugs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 310:327–337, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  19. Niemegeers CJE:In vivo pharmacology of antidiarrhoeal agents.In Diarrhoea—New insights, NW Read (ed). Clinical Research Reviews, Vol 1, Suppl 1, 1982 (in press)

  20. Jaffe JH, Kanzler M: Abuse potential of loperamide. Clin Pharmacol Ther 28:812–819, 1980

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cohen RA, Pops MA: Paradoxical diarrhea with opiates. J Am Med Assoc 205:802, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  22. Krejs GJ, Fordtran JS: The physiology and pathophysiology of ion and water movement in the human intestine.In Gastrointestinal Disease, MH Sleisenger, JS Fordtran (eds). Philadelphia, WB Saunders & Co. 1978, pp 313–335.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by grant no. 252 from the Special Trustees of the Former United Sheffield Hospitals, and by Janssen Pharmaceutica, Beerse, Belgium.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Read, M., Read, N.W., Barber, D.C. et al. Effects of loperamide on anal sphincter function in patients complaining of chronic diarrhea with fecal incontinence and urgency. Digest Dis Sci 27, 807–814 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01391374

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01391374

Keywords

Navigation