Skip to main content
Log in

Quality of life among patients treated for achalasia

  • Esophageal, Gastric, And Duodenal Disorders
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study is an attempt to capture the quality of life of achalasia patients after a successful treatment. It is also an effort to assess the extent of the subsequent restrictions achalasia may have imposed upon the patients' life-style. All achalasia patients who were successfully treated between 1984 and 1992 were identified. Qualified patients were supplied with a 12-item quality-of-life questionnaire that had been designed to assess the patients' perceptions of their swallowing function and their general health; the restrictions achalasia had imposed on five areas of performance, which encompassed social activities, family relationships, travel experiences, sports and housework activities, were also assessed. Sixty-six patients were offered the questionnaire and 52 (77.6%) returned a completed form. Forty-one of the group had pneumatic dilatation and the remaining 11 had cardiomyotomy. Some form of dysphagia was reported by 36 patients (69%) and a dietary modification was exercised by 29 (56%) of them. Heartburn was reported by 31 (59%) of the patients. Fifteen percent of the patients felt that the disease interfered with their social activities, 8% experienced difficulty in their family relations, 13% believed that the disease restricted travel and athletics, and finally, 9% stated that their symptoms placed restrictions on their ability to do housework. The group that received pneumatic dilatation experienced less restriction in the performance areas of sports, travel, and housework. However, this difference was only significant in the area of sports (P=0.04). It is concluded that: (1) The restoration of the normal swallowing mechanism is not often achieved after treatment for achalasia. The majority of patients who have been treated continue to have a component of difficulty for the rest of their lives. (2) These residual symptoms leave an impact on the patients' life-style. This impact is least important in the performance area of family relationship and most impressive in the area of sports. (3) Finally, those patients who have been treated with cardiomyotomy are more restricted in sport activities than those who received pneumatic dilatation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Earlam RJ, Ellis FH Jr, Nobrega FT: Achalasia of the esophagus in a small urban community. Mayo Clin Proc 44:478–483, 1969

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mayberry JF, Atkinson M: Studies of incidence and prevalence of achalasia in the Nottington area. Q J Med 56:451–456, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Meshkinpour H, Kaye L, Elias A, Glick ME: Manometric and radiologic correlations in achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol 87:1567–1570, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kahrilas PJ, Kishk SM, Helm JF, Dodds WJ, Harig JM, Hogan WJ: Comparison of pseudoachalasia and achalasia. Am J Med 82:439–446, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sons HU, Borchard F, Muller-Jank L: Megaesophagus: Induction by a simple animal experiment. Report on the method. Exp Pathol 30(4):193–201, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim CH, Cameron AJ, Hsu JJ, Tally NJ, Trastek VF, Pairolero PC, O'Conner MK, Colwell LJ, Zinsmeister AR: Achalasia: Prospective evaluation of relationship between lower esophageal sphincter pressure, esophageal transit, and esophageal diameter and symptoms in response to pneumatic dilatation. Mayo Clin Proc 68:1067–1073, 1993

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vantrappen G, Janssens J: To dilate or to operate? That is the question. Gut 24:1013–1019, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barnett JL, Eisenman R, Nostrant TT, Elta GH: Witzel pneumatic dilatation for achalasia: safety and long term efficacy. Gastrointest Endosc 36:482–485, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Csendes A, Braghetto I, Henriquez A, Cortes C: Late results of a prospective randomized study comparing forceful dilatation and esophagomyotomy in patients with achalasia. Gut 30:299–304, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaqdakia SC, Wong RKH: Graded pneumatic dilatation using Rigiflex achalasia dilators in patients with primary esophageal achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol 88:34–38, 1993

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gelfand MD, Kozarek RA: An experience with polyethylene balloons for pneumatic dilatation in achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol 84:924–927, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vantrappen G, Hellemans J: Treatment of achalasia and related motor disorders. Gastroenterol 79:144–154, 1980

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fellows IW, Ogilvie AL, Atkinson M: Pneumatic dilatation in achalasia. Gut 24:1020–1023, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meshkinpour, H., Haghighat, P. & Meshkinpour, A. Quality of life among patients treated for achalasia. Digest Dis Sci 41, 352–356 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02093828

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02093828

Key words

Navigation