Skip to main content
Log in

Differentiation of benign from malignant pancreatic masses by endoscopic ultrasound

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: It is often difficult to determine whether a mass in the pancreas is benign or malignant. The goal was to evaluate whether endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) can reliably establish whether a mass is benign or malignant.

Methods: One hundred five patients with possible pancreatic tumors were referred for EUS. Those who were found to have a lesion suspicious for carcinoma and did not have a known malignancy also underwent EUS-guided FNA.

Results: A mass suspicious for cancer was identified in 73 patients, whereas inflammatory changes or a normal pancreas was noted in 32 patients. Four of the latter 32 patients were subsequently found to have cancer. EUS-guided FNA was performed on 47 of the 73 patients with a suspicious mass and was read as cancer in 27 patients, atypia in 10 patients, and benign in 10 patients. All 10 patients with atypia were subsequently confirmed to have cancer, and 6 of the 10 patients with a benign FNA were proved to have a tumor at surgery. EUS could differentiate the lesion as malignant with a sensitivity of 95%, specificity 88%, positive predictive value 95%, and negative predictive value 88%.

Conclusions: Radial array EUS is helpful in supporting or refuting a diagnosis of cancer in a patient with a pancreatic mass. Although EUS-guided FNA can confirm the diagnosis, a negative FNA should not preclude exploration when clinically indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wiersema MJ, Wiersema LM. Endosonography of the pancreas: normal variation versus changes of early chronic pancreatitis.Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 1995;5:487–96.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Snady H, Cooperman A, Siegel J. Endoscopic ultrasonography compared with computed tomography with ERCP in patients with obstructive jaundice or small peripancreatic mass.Gastrointest Endosc 1992;38:27–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Muller MF, Meyenberger C, Bertschinger P, Schaer R, Marincek B. Pancreatic tumors: evaluation with endoscopic US, CT, and MR imaging.Radiology 1994;190:745–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosch T, Lorenz R, Braig C, Feuerbach S, Siewert JR, Schusdziarra V, Classen M. Endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic tumor diagnosis.Gastrointest Endosc 1991;37:347–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cahn M, Chang K, Nguyen P, Butler J. Impact of endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration on the surgical management of pancreatic cancer.Am J Surg 1996;172:470–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vilmann P, Jacobsen GK, Henriksen FW, Hancke S. Endoscopic ultrasonography with guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in pancreatic disease.Gastrointest Endosc 1992;38:172–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wiersema MJ, Hawes RH, Tao L, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography as an adjunct to fine needle aspiration cytology of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract.Gastrointest Endosc 1992;38:35–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Giovannini M, Seitz JF, Monges G, Perrier H, Rabbia I. Fine-needle aspiration cytology guided by endoscopic ultrasonography: results in 141 patients.Endoscopy 1995;27:171–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baron PL, Cole DJ, Baron LF, Daniel DM, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ. Endoscopic ultrasound can effectively diagnose and predict resectability of pancreatic cancers (abstract).Program of the Annual Meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology 1996;49:9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hoffman BJ, Hawes RH. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided puncture of the lymph nodes: first experience and clinical consequences.Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 1995;5:587–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaufman AR, Sivak MV. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic disease.Gastrointest Endosc 1989;35:214–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zuccaro G Jr, Sivak MV Jr. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis.Endoscopy 1992;24(Suppl 1):347–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nattermann C, Goldschmidt AJ, Dancygier H. Endosonography in chronic pancreatitis—comparison between endoscopic retrograde pancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography.Endoscopy 1993;25:565–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Buscail L, Escourrou J, Moreau J, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography in chronic pancreatitis: a comparative prospective study with conventional ultrasonography, computed tomography, and ERCP.Pancreas 1995;10:251–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Forsmark CE. Differential diagnosis of pancreatic tumors.Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 1995;5:713–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoffman BJ, Hawes RH. Endoscopic ultrasound and clinical competence.Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 1995;5:879–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Boyce GA, Sivak MV. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors.Gastrointest Endosc 1990;36:S28-S32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosch TH, Dancygier H, Lorenz R, Classen M. Endoscopic ultrasonography in chronic pancreatitis. In: Dancygier H, Classen M, eds.5th International symposium on endoscopic ultrasound. New York: Demeter Verlag, 1989:83–5.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barthet M, Portal I, Boujaoude J, Bernard JP, Sahel J. Endoscopic ultrasonographic diagnosis of pancreatic cancer complicating chronic pancreatitis.Endoscopy 1996;28:487–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yasuda K, Mukai H, Nakajima M. Endoscopic ultrasonography diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 1995;5:699–712.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chang KJ. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic tumors.Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 1995;5:723–34.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Moertel CG, Frytak S, Hahn RG, Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. Therapy of locally unresectable pancreatic carcinoma: a randomized comparison of high dose (6000 rads) radiation alone, moderate dose radiation (4000 rads + 5 fluorouracil), and high dose radiation + 5 — fluorouracil.Cancer 1981;48:1705–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoffman JP, Weese JL, Solin LJ, et al. A pilot study of preoperative chemoradiation for patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.Am J Surg 1995;169:71–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Staley CA, Lee JE, Cleary KR, Abbruzzese JL, Fenoglio CJ, Rich TA, Evans DB. Preoperative chemoradiation, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and intraoperative radiation therapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head.Am J Surg 1996;171:118–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baron, P.L., Abakken, L.E., Cole, D.J. et al. Differentiation of benign from malignant pancreatic masses by endoscopic ultrasound. Annals of Surgical Oncology 4, 639–643 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02303748

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02303748

Key Words

Navigation