Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of funding on the outputs of biomedical research

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Research Outputs Database (ROD) has been used to investigate the effects of different input variables, including the numbers of funding bodies, on the impact of research papers in a biomedical subfield (gastroenterology). This was determined by the medium-term impact of the journals in which they were published. It was shown that, when account was taken of the effects of the other input factors, the mean impact for a group of papers increased with the number of authors, the type of research (basic more than clinical), and with the number and identity of the funding bodies. However itdecreased slightly if there were more addresses; whether the paper was multinational had no significant effect. Previous work showing that multi-institution or multi-country papers are more highly cited reached this conclusion because it did not take into account the confounding effect of multiple funding sources, and possibly other factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson J.(1989), The evaluation of research training. In:D.C. Evered, S Harnett(Eds),The Evaluation of Scientific Research, 93–119 Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J., MacLean, M., Davies, C.(1996),Malaria Research: An Audit of International Activity, PRISM report no 7 (ISBN 1 869835 68 9), The Wellcome Trust, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Grupp, H. (1995), The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989–93. Part II Life Sciences,Scientometrics, 34: 207–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P.M.D. (1991),Quantitative Assessment of Departmental Research, SEPSU Policy Study, no 5, The Royal Society, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins C. et al. (1996),BBSRC Review of Structural Biology, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, Swindon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeschin, D., Lewison, G., Anderson, J. (1995), A bibliometric database for tracking acknowledgements of research funding,Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, 235–244, Learned Information Inc, Medford NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewison G., Cunningham P.(1989), The use of bibliometrics in the evaluation of Community biotechnology research programmes,Select Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Science and Technology Indicators, 99–114, DSWO Press, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewison G., Dawson G., Anderson J. (1995), The behaviour of biomedical scientific authors in acknowledging their funding sources,Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, 255–264. Learned Information Inc, Medford NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewison G. (1996), The definition of biomedical research subfields with title keywords and application to the analysis of research outputs,Research Evaluation, 6: 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewison G., Dawson G., Anderson J. (1997), Support for UK biomedical research from tobacco industry.The Lancet, 349: 778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewison G. (1998), New bibliometric techniques for the evaluation of medical schools,Scientometrics, 41: 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maclean M., Davies C., Lewison G., Anderson J. (1997). Evaluating research activity and impact at the level of the funding body, submitted toResearch Evaluation, in press.

  • Magnien E., Aguilar A., Wragg P., De Nettancourt D. (1989), Laboratoires Européens sans murs (European Laboratories Without Walls).Biofutur, 17 November, 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • May R. (1997), The scientific wealth of nations,Science, 275: 793–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed H. F., van Leeuwen T. N. (1996), Impact factors can mislead,Nature, 381: 186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin F., Pinski G., Gee H.H. (1976), Structure of the biomedical literature,Journal of the American Society for Information Science 27: 25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin F., Stevens K., Whitlow E.S. (1991), Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers,Scientometrics, 21: 313–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin F. (1994), Patent bibliometrics,Scientometrics, 30: 147–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seglen P.O. (1997), Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research,BMJ, 314: 498–502.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unit for Policy Research in Science and Medicine (PRISM), The Wellcome Trust, 210 Euston Road, NW1 2BE, London, (England)

    G. Lewison & G. Dawson

Authors
  1. G. Lewison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Dawson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewison, G., Dawson, G. The effect of funding on the outputs of biomedical research. Scientometrics 41, 17–27 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457963

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457963

Keywords

Search

Navigation