Skip to main content
Log in

Quality of life of patients on long-term total parenteral nutrition at home

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quality of life and quality-adjusted survival were measured for a cohort of 73 patients maintained on long-term parenteral nutrition at home (HPN) for periods ranging from six months to 12 years. Quality-adjusted survival was also modeled (although not directly observed) for this cohort under alternative therapeutic strategies (e.g., parenteral nutrition in hospital as needed). Using three utility assessment techniques (category scaling, time-tradeoff, direct questioning of objectives), quality of life was measured through interviews with 37 patients. The quality of life of the patients interviewed was good (mean value 0.73 where 0 represents death and 1.0 represents perfect health); for those who had experienced a period of chronic malnutrition before HPN, quality of life had improved. For the entire cohort, the estimate of quality-adjusted survival was four times greater with HPN than with the alternative therapeutic strategies (p<0.001). In comparison with alternative strategies, HPN significantly improves the quality of life of patients unable to sustain themselves with oral alimentation. Quality of life (utility) techniques can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions for patients with chronic diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Langer B, McHattie JD, Zohrab WJ, Jeejeebhoy KN. Prolonged survival after complete bowel resection using intravenous alimentation at home. J Surg Res 1973;15:226–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jeejeebhoy KN, Langer B, Tsallas G. et al. Total parenteral nutrition at home: studies in patients surviving 4 months to 5 years. Gastroenterology 1976;71:943–53

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bardos DC, Cameron JL. Successful long-term intravenous hyperalimentation in the hospital and at home. Arch Surg 1975;110:439–41

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fleming CR, McGill DB, Berkner S. Home parenteral nutrition as primary therapy in patients with extensive Crohn’s disease of the small bowel and malnutrition. Gastroenterology 1977;73:1077–81

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Grieg PD, Jeejeebhoy KN, Langer B, Cohen Z. A decade of home parenteral nutrition. Gastroenterology 1981;80:1164

    Google Scholar 

  6. Broviac JW, Scribner BH. Prolonged parenteral nutrition in the home. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1974;139:27–8

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rault RMJ, Scribner BH. Treatment of Crohn’s disease with home parenteral nutrition. Gastroenterology 1977;72:1249–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fleming CR, Beart RW, Berkner S, et al. Home parenteral nutrition for management of the severely malnourished adult patient. Gastroenterology 1980;79:11–18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Byrne WJ, Ament ME, Burke M, Fonkalsrud E. Home parenteral nutrition. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1979;149:593–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jeejeebhoy KN, ed. Total parenteral nutrition in the hospital and at home. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  11. Price B, Levin L. Permanent total parenteral nutrition: psychological and social responses of the early stages. J Parenteral Enteral Nutrition 1979;3:48–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Perl M, Hall RC, Dudrick SJ, et al. Psychological aspects of long-term home hyperalimentation. J Parenteral Enteral Nutrition 1980;4:554–60

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. MacRitchie KH. Life without eating or drinking: total parenteral nutrition outside the hospital. Canad Psych Assoc J 1978;23:373–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ladefoged K. Quality of life in patients on home parenteral nutrition. J Parenteral Enteral Nutrition 1981;5:132–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Blalock HM. Methodology in survey research. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  16. Guilford JP. Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fanshel S, Bush JW. A health status index and its application to health services outcomes. Op Res 1970;18:1021–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaplan RM, Atkins CJ, Timms R. Validity of a quality of well-being scale as an outcome measure in chronic obstruction pulmonary disease. J Chronic Dis 1984;37:85–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Torrance GW, Thomas WK, Sackett DL. A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. Health Serv Res 1972;7:118–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Torrance GW. Social preferences for health states: an empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques. Socio-econ Plan Sci 1976;10:129–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McNeil BJ, Weichselbaum R, Pauker SG. Speech and survival: trade-offs between quality of life in laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 1981;305:982–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wolfson AD, Sinclair AJ, Bombardier C, McGeer A. Preference measurements for functional status in stroke patients: inter-rater and intertechnique comparisons. In: Kane RL, Kane RA, eds. Values and long term care. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  23. Boyle MH, Torrance GW. Developing multiattribute health indexes. Med Care 1984;22:1045–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Torrance GW. Multiattribute utility theory as a method of measuring social preferences for health states in long-term care. In: Kane RL, Kane RA, eds. Values and Long-term Care, Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  25. Anderson S, Auguier A, Hauck WW, et al. Statistical methods for comparative studies: techniques for bias reduction. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  26. Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P, et al. Design and analysis of randomized controlled trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient: II — analysis and examples. Br J Cancer 1977;35:1–39

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Llewellyn-Thomas H, Sutherland HJ, Tibshirani R, et al. The measurement of patient’s values in medicine. Med Decis Making 1982;2:449–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Abrams HB, et al. A cost-utility analysis of the home parenteral nutrition program at Toronto General Hospital: 1970–82. J Parenteral Enteral Nutrition. Jan–Feb 1986, in press

  29. Mikesell RF. The rate of discount for evaluating public projects. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cupples LA, Heeren T, Schatzkin A, Colton T. Multiple testing of hypotheses in comparing two groups. Ann Intern Med 1984;100:122–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received from the Departments of Health Administration and Medicine, University of Toronto, and the Department of Medicine, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Supported by the Ontario Ministry of Health (DM602) and also in part by the National Health Research and Development Program through a National Health Research Scholar Award to Dr. Detsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Detsky, A.S., McLaughlin, J.R., Abrams, H.B. et al. Quality of life of patients on long-term total parenteral nutrition at home. J Gen Intern Med 1, 26–33 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596321

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596321

Key words

Navigation