Skip to main content
Log in

Imaging of small intestinal Crohn’s disease: comparison between MR enteroclysis and conventional enteroclysis

  • Gastrointestinal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare MR enteroclysis (MRE) with conventional enteroclysis (CE) in patients with small intestinal Crohn’s disease. Fifty-two consecutive patients with known or suspected Crohn’s disease underwent MR and conventional enteroclysis, which was considered the gold standard. Eleven imaging features, classified in three groups, mucosal, transmural and extraintestinal, were subjectively evaluated by two experienced radiologists. MRE and CE were in full agreement in revealing, localizing and estimating the length of all involved segments of the small bowel. The sensitivity of MRE for the detection of superficial ulcers, fold distortion and fold thickening was 40, 30 and 62.5%, respectively. The sensitivity of MRE for the detection of deep ulcers, cobble-stoning pattern, stenosis and prestenostic dilatation was 89.5, 92.3, 100 and 100%, respectively. Additional findings demonstrated on MRE images included fibrofatty proliferation in 15 cases and mesenteric lymphadenopathy in 19 cases. MRE strongly correlates with CE in the detection of individual lesions expressing small intestinal Crohn’s disease. It provides additional information from the mesenteries; however, its capability to detect subtle lesions is still inferior to conventional enteroclysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig.1
Fig.2
Fig.3
Fig. 4
Fig.5
Fig.6
Fig.7
Fig.8
Fig.9
Fig.10
Fig.11
Fig. 12
Fig.13
Fig.14
Fig.15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nolan DJ, Gourtsoyiannis NC (1980) Crohn’s disease of the small intestine: a review of the radiological appearances in 100 consecutive patients examined by a barium infusion technique. Clin Radiol 31(5):597–603

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ruiz-Cruces R, Ruiz F, Perez-Martinez M, Lopez J, Tort Ausina I, de los Rios AD (2000) Patient dose from barium procedures. Br J Radiol 73(871):752–761

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gasser J, Umschaden M, Haselbach H (2000) Small-bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology 215:717–725

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Maris T, Prassopoulos P (2000) Magnetic resonance imaging of the small bowel using a True-FISP sequence after enteroclysis with water solution. Invest Radiol 35(12):707–711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gourtsoyiannis NC, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Maris T, Prassopoulos P (2001) MR enteroclysis protocol optimization: comparison between 3d FLASH with fat saturation after intravenous gadolinium injection and true FISP sequences. Eur Radiol 11(6):908–913

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Prassopoulos P, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Rousomoustakaki M, Maris T, Gourtsoyiannis N (2001) MR enteroclysis imaging of crohn disease. Radiographics 21:161–172

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rofsky NM, Lee VS, Laub G, Pollack MA, Krinsky GA, Thomasson D, Ambrosino MM, Weinreb JC (1999) Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology 212(3):876–884

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Narin B, Ajaj W, Gohde S et al (2004) Combined small and large bowel MR imaging in patients with Crohn’s disease: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 14:1535–1542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lauenstein TC, Schneemann H, Vogt FM, Herborn CU, Ruhm SG, Debatin JF (2003) Optimization of oral contrast agents for MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiology 228:279–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Rieber A, et al (2002) Evaluation of the small intestine by MR imaging. In: Gourtsoyiannis N (ed) Radiological imaging of the small intestine. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 157–170

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schunk K, Kern A, Oberholzer K, Kalden P, Mayer I, Orth T, Wanitschke R (2000) Hydro-MRI in Crohn’s disease. Appraisal of disease activity. Invest Radiol 35:431–437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Maccioni F, Viscido A, Broglia L, Marrollo M, Masciangelo R, Caprilli R, Rossi P (2000) Evaluation of Crohn’s disease activity with magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging 25:219–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Papamastorakis G, Prassopoulos P, Roussomoustakaki M (2004) Assessment of Crohn’s disease activity in the small bowel with MR and conventional enteroclysis: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 14(6):1017–1024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Low RN, Sebrechts CP, Politoske DA, Bennett MT, Flores S, Snyder RJ, Pressman JH (2002) Crohn disease with endoscopic correlation: single-shot fast spin echo and gadolinium-enhanced fat-supressed spoiled gradient echo MR imaging. Radiology 222:652–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Koh DM, Miao Y, Chinn RJ et al (2001) MR Imaging evaluation of the activity in Crohn’s disease. AJR 177:1325–1332

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Semelka RC, Chung JJ, Hussain SM, Marcos HB, Woosley JT (2001) Chronic hepatitis: correlation of early patchy and late linear enhancement patterns on gadolinium-enhanced MR images with histopathology initial experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 13(3):385–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nickolas Papanikolaou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gourtsoyiannis, N.C., Grammatikakis, J., Papamastorakis, G. et al. Imaging of small intestinal Crohn’s disease: comparison between MR enteroclysis and conventional enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 16, 1915–1925 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0248-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0248-8

Keywords

Navigation