Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Training surgeons in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

General surgeons commonly perform upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in practice, but few perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), partly because of limited training opportunities. This report focuses on the value of an ERCP fellowship training program to a broad-based, mature residency in surgery and our observations on the experience required for surgeons to be trained in advanced interventional ERCP.

Methods

Since the program was initiated in 1992, 13 ERCP fellows have been trained for individual periods of 6 to 14 months. This study investigated all procedures with fellow involvement (2,008 cases) from among a total experience of 3,641 ERCPs. Data collected included type of ERCP (diagnostic/therapeutic), fellow success in cannulating the duct of interest, and faculty success in cases of fellows who failed. Of the 13 fellows, 9 had previous endoscopy experience, but none had training in ERCP.

Results

An 85% cannulation rate was accepted as successful, and cannulation rates for each fellow were calculated for each 3-month period. The 85% mark was reached by 4 (31%) of 13 fellows in the first period, 2 of 13 fellows (15%) in the second period, 5 of 11 fellows (45%) in the third period, 7 of 10 fellows (70%) in the fourth period, and 1 of 1 fellow (100%) in the fifth period of training. On the average, it took 7.1 months and 102 ERCPs for trainees to reach desired success levels. Success came more promptly with prior exposure to endoscopy. Fellows without prior endoscopic experience required 148 cases to reach 85% success. Resident surgical experience with major pancreatic resections increased threefold after establishment of the fellowship.

Conclusions

Training in ERCP is possible within the scope of a surgical fellowship in a reasonable length of time and experience. Complication rates remain low even with fellow involvement. Establishment of an ERCP program increases the focus and experience of pancreas surgery in a surgical residency for chief residents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (2005) Methods of granting hospital privileges to perform gastrointestinal endoscopy. Retrieved October 24, 2005 at http://www.asge.org//pages/practice/Management/methodsofgranting.cfm?CFID=27519 & CFTOKEN = 42132197.

  2. Coakley FV, Qayyum A (2002) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 55: S2–S12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jowell PS, Baillie J, Branch MS, Affronti J, Browning CL, Bute PB (1996) Quantitative assessment of procedural competence: a prospective study of training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Ann Intern Med 125: 983–989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Larson GM, Mullins RJ, Wieman TJ, Polk HC Jr (1988) Evaluation of endoscopy training in a general surgery residency. Am Surg 54: 64–67

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lecesne R, Drouillard J, Taourel P, Rauturier JF, Bruel JM, Laurent F (1997) Techniques of MRI cholangiopancreatography: history, current status, and future prospects (in French). J Radiol 78: 623–627

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Leung JW, Chung RS (1992) Training in ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 38: 517–518

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Marks G (1989) The surgeon as endoscopist. Surg Clin North Am 69: 1123–1127

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Marks JM, Nussbaum MS, Pritts TA, Scheeres DE (2001) Evaluation of endoscopic and laparoscopic training practices in surgical residency programs. Surg Endosc 15: 1011–1015

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, Curioni S, Lomazzi A, Dinelli M, Minoli G, Crosta C, Comin U, Fertitta A, Prada A, Passoni GR, Testoni PA (2001) Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 96: 417–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Meguid A, Scheeres DE, Mellinger JD (1998) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a general surgery training program. Am Surg 64: 622–625

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mellinger JD, Ponsky JL (1994) Surgical endoscopy fellowships: what difference do they make? Surg Endosc 8: 86–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pontone P, Bogliolo G, Pietropaolo V, Poschmann AH (1998) Current status of the use of the endoscopic cholangiography technique (Italian). G Chir 19: 115–116

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. SAGES (1994) Framework for post-residency surgical education and training: a SAGES guideline. Surg Endosc 8: 1137–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. SAGES (2003) Guidelines for training in diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Retrieved October 24, 2005 at http://www.sages.org/sagespublication.php?doc=16

  15. Satava RM (1989) Establishing an endoscopy unit for surgical training. Surg Clin North Am 69: 1129–1145

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schutz SM, Abbott RM (2000) Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data. Gatrointest Endosc 52: 704–705

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vitale GC, Zavaleta CM. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for surgeons. Semin Laparosc Surg 2003. 10: 19–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Watkins JL, Etzkorn KP, Wiley TE, DeGuzman L, Harig JM (1996) Assessment of technical competence during ERCP training. Gastrointest Endosc 44: 411–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA

    G. C. Vitale, C. M. Zavaleta, D. S. Vitale, J. C. Binford, T. C. Tran & G. M. Larson

Authors
  1. G. C. Vitale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. M. Zavaleta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. S. Vitale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. C. Binford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T. C. Tran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. G. M. Larson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. C. Vitale.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vitale, G.C., Zavaleta, C.M., Vitale, D.S. et al. Training surgeons in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Surg Endosc 20, 149–152 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0308-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0308-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation