Elsevier

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volume 47, Issue 2, February 1998, Pages 144-148
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Enteroscopy for the initial evaluation of iron deficiency,☆☆,,★★

Presented in abstract form at the annual meeting of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Washington, DC, May 11-14, 1997.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(98)70347-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Background: Occult gastrointestinal blood loss is generally investigated with colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy in patients with iron-deficiency anemia. The aim of this study was to prospectively measure the additional diagnostic yield of examining the jejunum at the time of upper endoscopy in patients with iron-deficiency anemia. Methods: Asymptomatic patients with newly diagnosed iron-deficiency anemia who had no identifiable source of blood loss at colonoscopy underwent standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy with the Olympus SIF100L enteroscope followed by overtube-assisted enteroscopy. Upper tract and jejunal sources of blood loss were noted. Biopsy samples from the small bowel were taken when a bleeding lesion was not identified. Results: Thirty-one consecutive patients (13 men, mean age 71) with no gastrointestinal symptomatology were studied. Eleven patients (35%) had a bleeding source that required only esophagogastroduodenoscopy for identification; 8 patients (26%) had a source only in the jejunum; 2 patients (6%) (one with sprue) had a source in upper tract as well as jejunum. The enteroscopy was rated as causing minimal or mild discomfort in 25 of 31 patients (81%). Using Medicare reimbursement figures, a strategy of performing esophagogastroduodenoscopy first would have cost $656 per patient, whereas the strategy of performing esophagogastroduodenoscopy with enteroscopy as the initial test in all patients costs $467 per patient. Conclusions : Performance of push enteroscopy along with esophagogastroduodenoscopy increases the diagnostic yield from 41% to 67% when evaluating the upper gastrointestinal tract of asymptomatic patients with iron-deficiency anemia and, because of a lower cost, should be the preferred initial diagnostic test. (Gastrointest Endosc 1998:47:144-48)

Section snippets

Methods

Patients referred to the gastroenterology service between February 1993 and August 1996 for evaluation of iron deficiency were considered for study. Iron deficiency was defined as serum iron below 50 μg/dL combined with transferrin saturation below 25% or ferritin below 20 ng/mL. Patients with symptoms referable to the upper gastrointestinal tract, patients with an upper endoscopy performed in the previous 6 months, pregnant women, or women with unusually heavy menses were excluded from study.

Results

Thirty-one consecutive patients with iron deficiency who had no gastrointestinal symptoms were studied. Eighteen patients were women, and the mean (± SD) age of the study population was 71 ± 8 years with a range of 51 to 91 years. All patients had a complete colonoscopy that showed no lesions responsible for chronic blood loss. Twenty-five patients had no prior evaluation of the upper gastrointestinal tract, and six patients had previous EGD but not in the past 6 months. None of the previous

Discussion

Chronic occult gastrointestinal bleeding is often manifested by iron deficiency and anemia.1 Some patients present with gastrointestinal symptoms and concurrent anemia. The evaluation of these patients is fairly straightforward and focuses on their complaints. Other patients present with symptoms of anemia or are diagnosed to have iron deficiency when screening laboratory tests are obtained. The evaluation of these patients may become fairly extensive and costly. Approximately 2% to 10% of

References (23)

  • G Zuckerman et al.

    A prospective study of bidirectional endoscopy (colonoscopy and upper endoscopy) in the evaluation of patients with occult gastrointestinal bleeding

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (1992)
  • Cited by (64)

    • American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute Technical Review on Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding

      2007, Gastroenterology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Surgical procedures include exploratory laparotomy with and without intraoperative enteroscopy. Lesions overlooked during prior EGD, such as Cameron’s lesions, Dieulafoy’s lesions, vascular ectasias, peptic ulcers, and gastric antral vascular ectasias, account for up to half of the cases.6,36–38 Repeat EGD should be considered in patients with hematemesis and in those taking NSAIDs and the fundus should be carefully examined, with special attention to the site of diaphragmatic hiatus for Cameron’s lesion, which remains an underrecognized etiology of obscure GI bleeding.

    • Occult gastrointestinal bleeding

      2005, Gastroenterology Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Using conscious sedation, the enteroscope can be passed 50 to 60 cm beyond the ligament of Trietz, allowing examination of the distal duodenum and proximal jejunum. Push enteroscopy has been reported to identify a source of bleeding in from 6% to 27% of patients [27–29]. The major advantages of push enteroscopy are that it is readily available and relatively safe.

    • Human iron deficiency

      2005, Bulletin de l'Academie Nationale de Medecine
    • Performance of antegrade double-balloon enteroscopy: Comparison with push enteroscopy

      2005, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the 1980s and 1990s, clinical data for the use of PE were accumulated. The procedure has been shown to have a diagnostic value for GI bleeding,6-10,24,25 intestinal obstruction,25 GI polyposis,26,27 celiac sprue,28 and other pathology.29,30 However, it is difficult to determine the explored area of the small intestine during PE.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    From the Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio.

    ☆☆

    Reprint requests: Amitabh Chak, MD, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106-1736.

    Supported (A.C.), in part, by the Wilson Cook Endoscopic Research Scholar Award, 1997-98.

    ★★

    37/1/86729

    View full text