Original articlesPresentation, management and course of angina and suspected angina in primary care
Introduction
Cardiologists [1] and others have proposed guidelines for the management of suspected angina in primary care, including detailed criteria for specialist referral. In practice, however, GPs seem to refer only a minority of such patients, and hold divergent and contradictory opinions about management [2].
Little is known about incidence, prevalence, and management of angina in primary care. Surveys have reported an incidence of 1.1 per 1000 in middle-aged men aged 30–59 years [3]. A survey of prescriptions [4] suggested a prevalence of 1.5% in the total population; Fry reported a prevalence of 5 per 1000 in his general practice [5]. A recent estimate from subjects referred to an open-access ECG service found an incidence of only 1.13 per 1000 in men and 0.53 per 1000 in women aged 31–70 years [6].
However, only a portion of chest pain presentations in primary care suspected of being due to angina (e.g., 12% [7]) have been confirmed as being due to ischemic heart disease, and very little is known about the outcome of pain that is noncardiac. Hospital series indicate that “noncardiac chest pain” (NCCP) patients have a good prognosis in terms of mortality and cardiac morbidity and are usually reassured and discharged [8]. However, many continue to experience long-term symptoms and disability 9, 10.
In the present study, we aimed to:
- 1.
Estimate prevalence and incidence of angina.
- 2.
Describe the processes of assessment, investigation, and management of suspected angina.
- 3.
Describe the 2-year symptomatic and functional outcome of angina patients, compared with patients whose provisional diagnosis of suspected ischemic heart disease (IHD) was not subsequently sustained (NCCP).
Section snippets
Method
The study was conducted from January to March 1992 at a four-partner, 6600-patient, urban Oxford teaching practice serving a mainly industrial population. The practice has used a VAMP computer system since January 1989 for all prescribing, with a corresponding history entry; paper A4 records were also maintained.
Results
Results are presented separately for patients with: confirmed angina (i.e., those in whom the diagnosis of angina was believed to be correct at the time of the survey); patients who newly presented with suspected angina in the 3-year period 1989–1991; and for patients found to have noncardiac chest pain.
Discussion
Our study raises important general issues about the identification and management of both angina and noncardiac chest pain in general practice, and the role of specialist services. Whereas there are advantages of a detailed study of a single general practice, there are also limitations. Practices vary widely, and findings in a single health center with academic links must be interpreted with caution. Nonetheless, there is no reason to believe that the frequency of angina and other chest pain
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr. E. Barclay for the collection of the data from the notes. We are grateful to the the staff at Hollow Way Surgery for their cooperation with the study. This work was funded by a grant from the British Heart Foundation.
References (14)
- et al.
The prevalence of angina as assessed by a survey of prescriptions for nitrates
Lancet
(1988) - et al.
Progress and symptoms one year after discharge from the emergency department in patients with acute chest pain
Chest
(1994) The investigation and management of stable angina
R Coll Physicians
(1993)- et al.
Management of angina pectoris in general practicea questionnaire survey of general practitioners
Br J Gen Pract
(1995) Study of angina in patients aged 30 to 59 in general practice
BMJ
(1982)The natural history of angina in a general practice
J R Coll Gen Pract
(1976)- et al.
Incidence, clinical characteristics, and short-term prognosis of angina pectoris
Br Heart J
(1995)
Cited by (9)
Prevalence, treatment, and control of chest pain syndromes and associated risk factors in hypertensive patients
2005, American Journal of HypertensionDiagnosis and risk management in primary care: Words that count, numbers that speak
2017, Diagnosis and Risk Management in Primary Care: Words that Count, Numbers that SpeakThe conundrum of detecting stable angina pectoris in the community setting
2010, Nature Reviews CardiologyEnhanced external counterpulsation for chronic angina pectoris
2008, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews