Research Paper
Cell proliferation and the aetiology of hepatocellular carcinoma

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8278(88)80002-3Get rights and content

Summary

The liver is, under normal conditions, mitotically inactive and relatively resistant to chemical carcinogenesis. When rat or mouse hepatocytes are stimulated to divide, however, the liver becomes exquisitely sensitive to carcinogenesis. The heightened sensitivity of dividing liver cells to carcinogens is one of the most dramatic phenomena in the field of experimental chemical carcinogenesis and is reproducible with a wide variety of chemical agents and experimental conditions. This same phenomenon seems to apply to humans, as circumstances that produce a sustained hepatocellular proliferation in man are associated with an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). These include inborn errors of metabolism (e.g., haemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, hereditary tyrosinaemia) as well as alcoholism. A recent editorial in this Journal suggested that any condition resulting in cirrhosis is also associated with an increased risk of HCC, and this may in turn be due to regenerative hyperplasia always present in cirrhotic liver ([1]; Johnson PJ, Williams R. J Hepatol 1987; 4: 140–147). In the case of HCC associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, the possibility must be entertained that chronic HBV infection serves to produce a sustained hepatonecrosis with concurrent (regenerative) hyperplasia. This proliferative state would in theory serve to increase the liver's susceptibility to environmental dietary carcinogens and may tend to increase the risk of HCC by this indirect mechanism. Until a molecular mechanism is demonstrated whereby HBV produces a defined cellular lesion that endows hepatocytes with a malignant phenotype, it should not be assumed that HBV is a direct cause of HCC.

References (45)

  • BucherNLR

    Experimental aspects of hepatic regeneration (concluded)

    N Engl J Med

    (1967)
  • CraddockVM

    Liver carcinomas induced in rats by single administration of dimethylnitrosamine after partial hepatectomy

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1971)
  • CraddockV et al.

    Induction of liver cell adenomata in the rat by a single treatment of N-methyl-N-nitrosourea given at various times after partial hepatectomy

    Br J Cancer

    (1974)
  • ChernozemskiJN et al.

    Liver regeneration and induction of hepatomas in B6AF/B6AF mice by urethan

    Cancer Res

    (1976)
  • HollanderCF et al.

    Enhancement of urethan induction of hepatomas in mice by prior partial hepatectomy

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1968)
  • SoltD et al.

    Rapid emergence of carcinogen-induced initiated hepatocytes in liver carcinogenesis

    Am J Pathol

    (1977)
  • CayamaE et al.

    Initiation of liver carcinogenesis requires cell proliferation

    Nature

    (1978)
  • WilliamsGM et al.

    Cytochemical and ultrastructural alterations associated with confluent growth in cell cultures of epithelial-like cells from rat liver

    Lab Invest

    (1973)
  • TongC et al.

    Cell cycle-specific mutagenesis at the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase locus in adult rat liver epithelial cells

  • BertramJS et al.

    Cell cycle dependency of oncogenic transformation induced by N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitroguanidine in culture

    Cancer Res

    (1974)
  • MarquardtH

    Cell cycle dependence of chemically induced malignant transformation in vitro

    Cancer Res

    (1974)
  • HaeseWH et al.

    Hycanthone-induced hepatic changes in mice infected with Schistosoma mansoni

    J Pharmacol Exp Ther

    (1973)
  • Cited by (20)

    • Hepatitis B and C viruses in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma

      1994, Critical Reviews in Oncology and Hematology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text