Elsevier

Biochimie

Volume 83, Issues 3–4, March–April 2001, Pages 367-372
Biochimie

Interferon-γ inducible exchanges of 20S proteasome active site subunits: Why?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9084(01)01251-2Get rights and content

Abstract

When cells are stimulated with the cytokines IFN-γ or TNF-α, the synthesis of three proteasome subunits LMP2 (β1i), LMP7 (β5i), and MECL-1 (β2i) is induced. These subunits replace the three subunits delta (β1), MB1 (β5), and Z (β2), which bear the catalytically active sites of the proteasome, during proteasome neosynthesis. The cytokine-induced exchanges of three active site subunits of a complex protease is unprecedented in biology and one may expect a strong functional driving force for this system to evolve. These cytokine-induced replacements of proteasome subunits are believed to favour the production of peptide ligands of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules for the stimulation of cytotoxic T cells. Although the peptide production by constitutive proteasomes is able to maintain peptide-dependent MHC class I cell surface expression in the absence of LMP2 and LMP7, these subunits were recently shown to be pivotal for the generation or destruction of several unique epitopes. In this review we discuss the recent data on LMP2/LMP7/MECL-1-dependent epitope generation and the functions of each of these subunit exchanges. We propose that these subunit exchanges have evolved not only to optimize class I peptide loading but also to generate LMP2/LMP7/MECL-1-dependent epitopes in inflammatory sites which are not proteolytically generated in uninflamed tissues. This difference in epitope generation may serve to better stimulate T cells in the sites of an ongoing immune response and to avoid autoimmunity in uninflamed tissues.

Introduction

The proteasome is by far the most important provider of peptide ligands for the presentation on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules 〚1〛, 〚2〛, 〚3〛. However, the proteasome executes a host of important cellular functions other than antigen processing and evolved much earlier than the specific immune system 〚4〛, 〚5〛. It is therefore assumed that both the peptide binding groove of MHC class I molecules as well as the transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP) 〚6〛 adapted to the range of peptide products which can be produced by the proteasome 〚7〛. In vitro, the 20S and 26S proteasomes produce peptides of 3–25 amino acids in length of which about 15% meet the strict length requirement of eight or nine amino acids for MHC class I ligands 〚8〛, 〚9〛, 〚10〛, 〚11〛. In order to bind with reasonable affinity to the cleft of class I proteins, the peptide ligands need to contain anchor residues which are situated at the C terminus and at some other position within the peptide sequence which varies among different MHC molecules and alleles 〚12〛. The proteasome is responsible for generating the C-termini of class I ligands but the binding pockets for P1 residues in proteasomes do not perfectly match the C-terminal anchor residues of MHC class I peptide ligands which are hydrophobic in mice and either hydrophobic or basic in humans. The proteasome contains three different active site subunits named β5, β2, and β1 which according to mutagenesis experiments in yeast preferentially cleave C-terminal of hydrophobic, basic, and acidic residues 〚10〛, 〚13〛. These three activities have been classified with fluorogenic peptides according to their P1 specificity as chymotrypsin-like, trypsin-like, and caspase-like, respectively. Since no class I molecules with acidic anchor residues have been described in mice or humans in spite of extensive investigations it appears that the caspase-like activity would not be able to generate class I ligands in mice and humans and may even destroy them by internally cleaving potential class I ligands.

It appears that the immune systems of mice and humans have invented a mechanism to adjust the specificity of the proteasome to the needs of MHC class I restricted antigen presentation. When the antiviral cytokines IFN-γ or TNF-α are produced by T cells during an acute immune response, the cytokine-stimulated cells in the inflammatory site will transcriptionally induce the synthesis of three extra proteasome subunits called LMP2 (β1i), LMP7 (β5i), and MECL-1 (β2i). They are homologous to the three active site bearing subunits delta (β1), MB1 (β5), and Z (β2) of the proteasome and due to a strong overproduction, the inducible subunits are incorporated into newly assembled proteasomes instead of the constitutively expressed subunits. The inducible subunits also possess the residues which are required for the peptidolytic activity like 1Thr or 33Lys and can thus be expected to be catalytically active. Altough these subunit exchanges have been intensively investigated for the past 10 years, their precise function is still a matter of debate and largely unknown.

Section snippets

LMP2 versus delta: a coherent picture

The most consistent data and conceptions exist for the replacement of subunit delta by LMP2 because it has been unanimously reported by several laboratories that the overexpression either of mutated or wildtype LMP2 reduces the caspase-like activity of the proteasome almost to background levels 〚9〛, 〚14〛, 〚15〛, 〚16〛. Conversely, the 20S proteasomes from spleen cells of LMP2-/- mice displayed an enhancement in the caspase-like activity compared to wild type mice 〚17〛. Incorporation of LMP2 led

LMP7 versus MB1: a structural requirement?

If the LMP2/delta exchange takes care of silencing the caspase-like activity, what is left for the other two exchanges of LMP7 for MB1 and MECL-1 for Z? As a matter of fact, the function of these two exchanges are poorly understood and the in vitro data obtained with fluorogenic peptides are contradictory. The overexpression of LMP7 in transfected HeLa cells yielded a 36% and 22% increase in the chymotrypsin-like and trypsin-like activity, respectively 〚14〛, but a discordant result was obtained

MECL-1 versus Z, a species difference between mice and men?

The subunit β2 (called Z in the human and MC14 or LMP9 in the mouse) can be replaced by the IFN-γ inducible subunit MECL-1. Unlike LMP2 and LMP7, the subunit MECL-1 is not encoded in the MHC locus and this may be the reason why the discovery of this third subunit exchange lagged behind by 5 years 〚28〛, 〚29〛, 〚30〛. To date there are no MECL-1 deficient mice or cell lines available and therefore the in vivo function of this third exchange is still poorly characterized. The inactivation of the β2

Are LMP2, LMP7, and MECL-1 incorporated in a concerted manner? A conflict of ‘optimal loading’ versus ‘optimal diversity’

Two concepts have been discussed as rationale for the subunit exchanges: the first we call the ‘optimal loading’ argument implying that the subunit exchanges produce in total a better suited spectrum of peptide ligands for the loading and stabilization of MHC class I molecules on the cell surface. The second argument is that of ‘optimal diversity’ indicating that the diversity of peptide ligands which can be produced from a given viral protein is greater if different populations of proteasomes

Why did the subunits LMP2, LMP7, and MECL-1 evolve to be cytokine-inducible?

A conceptional concern with the optimal loading hypothesis is that it remains unclear why LMP2, LMP7, and MECL-1 are expressed in an inducible rather than a constitutive manner if better ligands for class I molecules are made by immunoproteasomes. An obvious argument would be that the immunoproteasomes do not fulfil all the housekeeping functions of the proteasome system in the same way as constitutive proteasomes. The stable overexpression of LMP2, LMP7, and MECL-1 in mouse fibroblasts or

Concluding with a hypothesis

When the mild phenotype of LMP2- and LMP7-deficient mice was reported in 1994 the interest in the function of LMP2 and LMP7 declined. It became clear, that the bulk of MHC class I ligands can be made in absence of LMP2 and LMP7. However, the recent analyses of antigen presentation of distinguished epitopes showed that the impact of the inducible proteasome subunits can be pivotal for the generation of a given epitope. It appears that the induction of immunoproteasomes can promote 〚25〛, 〚26〛,

Acknowledgements

We thank Rita de Giuli for excellent technical assistance. This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant 31-52284.97/1), by the Roche Research Foundation, Novartis Foundation, and Rentenanstalt Jubiläumsstiftung.

References (40)

  • U. Salzmann et al.

    Mutational analysis of subunit i beta 2 (MECL-1) demonstrates conservation of cleavage specificity between yeast and mammalian proteasomes

    FEBS Lett.

    (1999)
  • B. Dahlmann et al.

    Identical subunit topographies of human and yeast 20S proteasomes

    Arch. Biochem. Biophys.

    (1999)
  • S. Morel et al.

    Processing of some antigens by the standard proteasome but not by the immunoproteasome results in poor presentation by dendritic cells

    Immunity

    (2000)
  • I.A. York et al.

    Proteolysis and class I major histocompatibility complex antigen presentation

    Immunol. Rev.

    (1999)
  • J. Yewdell et al.

    Generating MHC class I ligands from viral gene products

    Immunol. Rev.

    (1999)
  • O. Coux et al.

    Structure and functions of the 20 S and 26 S proteasomes

    Annu. Rev. Biochem.

    (1996)
  • D. Voges et al.

    The 26S proteasome: A molecular machine designed for controlled proteolysis

    Annu. Rev. Biochem.

    (1999)
  • G. Niedermann et al.

    Potential immunocompetence of proteolytic fragments produced by proteasomes before evolution of the vertebrate immune system

    J. Exp. M

    (1997)
  • A.K. Nussbaum et al.

    Cleavage motifs of the yeast 20S proteasome beta subunits deduced from digests of enolase 1

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (1998)
  • H.G. Rammensee et al.

    SYFPEITHI: database for MHC ligands and peptide motifs

    Immunogenetics

    (1999)
  • Cited by (133)

    • Cancer immunotherapy from biology to nanomedicine

      2021, Journal of Controlled Release
    • Role of Th1 and Th2 in autoimmunity

      2021, Translational Autoimmunity: Etiology of Autoimmune Diseases
    • The IFN-γ-induced immunoproteasome is suppressed in highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus-infected alveolar macrophages

      2020, Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology
      Citation Excerpt :

      These inducible subunits replace the homologous constitutive catalytic subunits, resulting in the formation of so-called immunoproteasomes (i-proteasomes) (Kruger and Kloetzel, 2012). Compared to that in the constitutive proteasome, i-proteasomes exhibit enhanced antigen presentation through altered cleavage specificity (including cleavage site preference and cleavage rate), which ultimately influences the quantity (Mishto et al., 2014) and/or quality of peptides that are presented on MHC class I molecules (Groettrup et al., 2001). Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) evades host immune responses through various mechanisms, leading to chronic, persistent infection (Meier et al., 2003).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text