Elsevier

Archives de Pédiatrie

Volume 4, Issue 12, December 1997, Pages 1238-1246
Archives de Pédiatrie

Enfant et société
Évaluation de la qualité de vie en pédiatrie : comment recueillir le point de vue de l'enfantAssessment of quality of life in pediatrics: a questionnaire to assess the child's own opinion

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-693X(97)82616-4Get rights and content

Résumé

Les instruments d'évaluation de la qualité de vie de l'enfant sont encore peu développés, surtout dans la dimension de prise en compte de l'avis de l'enfant lui-même à propos de a qualité de vie. Le questionnaire AUQUEI, que nous proposons, se compose d'une échelle fermée (26 items), qui explore la satisfaction des enfants à l'aide de paliers imagés dans différents domaines de leur vic. Il s'agit d'un autoquestionnaire destiné aux enfants de 4 à 12 ans. La validation de l'èchelle fermée a montré des qualités métrologiques satisfaisantes et la capacité du questionnaire à différencier une population d'enfants porteurs d'une pathologie (séropositivté VIH). Parallèlement, une question ouverte du quetionnaire AUQUEI permet de recenser les domaines spontanément pris en considération par les enfants lorsqu'ils sont interrogés à propos de leurs sources d'insatisfaction ou de satisfaction. La mise en évidence de ces critères pertinents pour les enfants a permis d'élargir l'échelle fermée et de comprendre comment se structure la notion de qualité de vie chez un enfant. Cette étape indispensable permet d'éviter un écueil courant dans l'évaluation de la qualité de vie de l'enfant, à savoir calquer les évaluations sur celles réalisées chez l'adulte, ou encore ne prendre en compte que les critères du concepteur du questionnaire. L'étude statistiques des réponses obtenues à cetter question ouverter montre que là encore il est possible de différencier les enfants porteurs d'une pathologie. Les deux parties du questionnaire AUQUEI appraissent donc complémentaires, et son usage devrait permettre de mieux connaître le vécu des jeunes patients à propos des divers aspects de leur vie, et de suivtre leur évolution. Cet instrument a bien sa place en éclairage d'une démarche d'évaluation clinique traditionnelle.

Summary

There are very few available child quality of life questionnaires. We describe here a French questionnaire (AUQUEI) which consists of a structured format scale (26 items). The first part of the questionnaire studies child satisfaction. Response levels are measured by checking faces expressing different emotional states. The validation is satisfactory, and the questionnaire is able to differentiate healthy children from sick children (HIV positive). A second part of the questionnaire focuses on the child's own quality of life, and is based upon open-ended questions. This second approach allows to broaden the structured format scale and improves the understanding of the child's quality of life. It constitutes a necessary complement to the first part as it avoids using mechanically adult-specific concepts for children. We also found it to be sensitive enough to distinguish sick children from healthy ones. The AUQUEI questionnaire with its two complementary parts appears to be a potentialy valuable tool to better understand the experience of sick children, in the various aspects of their life, and to follow their evolution.

Références (13)

  • PatrickDL et al.

    Assessing health-related quality of life for clinical decision making

  • DazordA et al.

    Évaluation de la qualité de vie : mise au point d'un instrument d'évaluation dans un contexte francophone

    Rev Eur Psychol Appliq

    (1995)
  • GerinP et al.

    Quality of life assessment in therapeutic trials: rationale for presentation of a more appropriate instrument

    Fundam Clin Pharmacol

    (1992)
  • SpilkerB

    Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials

    (1996)
  • ManificatS et al.

    La qualité de vie chez l'enfant

    Pédiatrie

    (1993)
  • MulhernRK et al.

    Play performance scale as an index of quality of life of children with cancer

    Psychol Assess

    (1990)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (62)

  • Impact of epilepsy surgery on quality of life and burden of caregivers in children and adolescents

    2020, Epilepsy and Behavior
    Citation Excerpt :

    The use of Zarit Burden Interview inventory (Zarit Burden Interview) is reliable to be used as a measure of the impact on the caregiver's physical and emotional well-being, their social and family life, and financial aspects [26]. The AUQUEI and QOLIE-AD-48 are epilepsy-specialized instruments applicable to children and adolescents, respectively, designed to evaluate QOL from a patient's perspective [27–29]. They both have been proven to show good validity and reliability.

  • A Rights-Based Approach for Service Providers to Measure the Quality of Life of Children with a Disability

    2018, Value in Health
    Citation Excerpt :

    QoL instruments are available for children aged 2 months to 18 years. Self-report versions are available for children as young as age 3 (TedQL [24]) or 4 (AUQUEI [25], KINDL [26]). Six instruments focused on children only (N = 5; AUQUEI, QUALIN, ExQoL [27], ITQoL, QoLQC [28], TedQL) and four focused on adolescents only (QoLP-AV [29], QoLQA [30], TQoLQA [31], YQoL [32]).

  • Design of the DREPAGREFFE trial: A prospective controlled multicenter study evaluating the benefit of genoidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation over chronic transfusion in sickle cell anemia children detected to be at risk of stroke by transcranial Doppler (NCT 01340404)

    2017, Contemporary Clinical Trials
    Citation Excerpt :

    Major pain is associated with worse school functioning in the parent report and with poor physical and psychosocial child self-reports [54]. The aim is to evaluate by self-questionnaire the quality of life of SCA children as well as the quality of family life [60–66], as the transplant or non-transplant may have disrupted or improved the family's experience of the disease. Psychological conditions are evaluated by psychologists in each center but not measured for research.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text