Clinical Science: Review
Endosonography in gastric lymphoma and large gastric folds

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-8266(99)00080-4Get rights and content

Abstract

To establish a correct preoperative differential diagnosis between gastric lymphoma and cancer is essential but can be difficult as endoscopic biopsies can sometimes provide a low diagnostic yield. By EUS, infiltrative carcinoma tends to show a vertical growth in the gastric wall, while lymphoma tends to show mainly a horizontal extension. EUS provides an accurate staging of gastric lymphoma, showing the exact level of infiltration and the presence of perigastric lymph nodes, thus the physician can obtain an accurate prognosis for each patient and select the best form of treatment accordingly. The response to chemoradiotherapy can also be investigated very accurately by EUS. Large gastric folds are seen in a great number of benign and malignant conditions. Diagnosis represents a clinical challenge because etiology may be extremely varied and standard biopsies are often inconclusive. Different diseases show different levels of infiltration of the gastric wall, thus a characteristic echo-pattern helps for the differential diagnosis. Endosonography, used always in combination with biopsy, allows to rule out malignancies and to select the most appropriate treatment for each patient (medical or surgical).

Introduction

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has made remarkable advances during the last 18 years, and it is now the most accurate imaging technique in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Many papers reported its value in the investigation of a large variety of gastrointestinal disorders, but at the moment the only established diagnostic indications are: the staging of malignant tumors, the characterization of submucosal lesions and of large gastric folds, the detection of small pancreatic tumors and the investigation of the biliary tree.

Many instruments, equipped with different scanning frequencies, are available. Up to now, the videoechoendoscopes with a radial scan of 360°, perpendicular to the long axis of the instrument, are most frequently used. The radial scanning provides an easier understanding of the anatomy and a faster scanning of the gastrointestinal tract. Frequencies are available ranging from 7.5 MHz to 20 MHz (Olympus GF-UM130 and GF-UMQ130). Lower frequencies (7.5 MHz) are useful to explore gross lesions in and outside the gut wall, while higher frequencies (20 MHz) are useful to explore accurately the wall layers and detect subtle changes in the mucosa.

Convex or linear scanning echoendoscopes, with respect to the anatomic orientation and to the general overview of the structures, appear to be inferior to the radial method. This is due to the limited scanning field (90°–120°), parallel to the long axis of the instrument. However, since the needle can be followed on the ultrasonographic screen, it is possible to perform EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) of target lesions located within and beyond the gastric wall.

Furthermore the incorporation of a Doppler signal, with or without color, makes understanding of the anatomical and vascular structures easier, thus performing FNA can be even safer (Olympus GF-UC30P), (Binmoeller et al., 1998a).

The Olympus GF-UM 30P is designed on the basis of the current mechanical radial scanning EUS scope but changing the direction of scanning into sector by using reflection of a rotatable mirror. Therefore it is possible to use the scope together with current EU-M30 observation unit and also perform the fine needle puncture under sonographic control. The available frequency is 7.5 MHz, but the most important feature is that the scanning range reaches 250°, thus allowing a larger field of exploration and an easier orientation, not-possible with other sector scanning instruments (Binmoeller et al., 1998b).

Several types of small ultrasonic probes have been designed for the imaging of gastrointestinal structures (Olympus UM-2R and UM-3R), (Yasuda, 1994). The main advantage of these probes, with a 7.5–30 MHz frequency range, is that they can be passed through the working channel of conventional endoscopes during upper and lower endoscopy, as well as in ERCP. High frequency miniprobes allow the visualization of mural gastrointestinal structures with much greater resolution, so that they can be useful to evaluate small and flat lesions such as early cancers. Anyway the depth of penetration is low, thus making the assessment of large tumors and extramural lesions difficult.

EUS appearance of the intestinal wall consists of a five-layer structure (1st, interface echo-mucosa; 2nd, deep mucosa; 3rd, submucosa; 4th, muscularis propria; and 5th serosa and subserosal fat) of different echogenicity (Kimmey et al., 1989) (Fig. 1). EUS diagnosis of gastrointestinal diseases relies on the detection of changes in the layer structure of the gastrointestinal wall. Neoplasms are usually detected as a disruption in the continuity of a layer or by diffuse layer thickening. A change in the echogenicity of the layers is another evidence of tissue pathology. Moreover, EUS is able to display the relationship of the tumor to neighboring organs, and early lymph node metastasis.

Section snippets

Gastric lymphoma

This type of extranodal non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma accounts for 2–8% of all gastric malignancies (Shiu et al., 1989). The potential therapeutic approaches differ from those for gastric carcinoma, and lymphoma usually has a better prognosis due to its sensitivity to non surgical treatment. To establish a correct preoperative differential diagnosis between gastric lymphoma and cancer is thus essential but generally considered difficult.

In fact, endoscopy with biopsies can sometimes provide a low

Endoscopic ultrasonography in gastric lymphoma

Several EUS studies on gastric cancer and lymphoma have demonstrated specific ultrasonographic features that allow correct diagnosis and staging in the majority of patients. EUS is thus considered to be a useful tool for preoperative staging of these diseases (Caletti et al., 1983, Aibe et al., 1986, Tio et al., 1986a, Tio et al., 1986b, Heyder, 1987, Tio et al., 1989, Tio et al., 1990).

EUS differential diagnosis between lymphoma, linitis plastica and Menetrier’s disease is difficult. All three

Large gastric folds

Diagnosis of large gastric folds (LGF) can be suspected if folds do not flatten at endoscopy or if folds of 1.5 cm or more in width are seen at barium UGI series or CT scan (Bjork et al., 1977, Vilardell, 1985). Menetrier (1888) was the first one to describe the presence of giant gastric folds in patients with hypertrophic gastritis and Menetrier’s disease has been the most commonly used eponym since then. Nevertheless, the differential diagnosis can be very difficult by means of endoscopic

Endoscopic ultrasonography in large gastric folds

EUS is very useful in assessing patients with LGF because it can accurately show which layers are thickened and whether the layer structure is preserved.

The normal gastric wall thickness range, seen at EUS, is assessed to be 0.8–3.6 mm (Kimmey et al., 1989); thus gastric wall is considered thickened at EUS when superior to 3.6 mm in width (Gordon et al., 1986, Botet and Lightdale, 1991, Caletti et al., 1993).

EUS ability to examine patients with large gastric folds has been recently

Conclusions

Clinical experience and several studies have demonstrated that EUS is an important tool for diagnosis and pretreatment staging of primary gastric lymphoma and for characterization of large gastric folds.

Moreover, EUS appears to be a sensitive procedure for assessing the response to treatment and for long-term follow up. In this respect, it is definitely superior to radiography and endoscopy in detecting subtle mucosal abnormalities or, at a greater extent, deeper gastric wall infiltration.

References (60)

  • M. Levy et al.

    Endoscopic ultrasonography for the initial staging and follow-up in patients with low-grade gastric lymphorna of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue treated medically

    Gastrointest. Endosc.

    (1997)
  • T.R. Martin et al.

    Lift and cut biopsy technique for submucosal sampling

    Gastrointest. Endosc.

    (1976)
  • V. Maunoury et al.

    Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of hypertrophic gastropathy (Letter)

    Gastroenterology

    (1994)
  • R.E. Mendis et al.

    Large gastric folds: a diagnostic approach using endoscopic ultrasonography

    Gastrointest. Endosc.

    (1994)
  • R.S. Nelson et al.

    The endoscopic diagnosis of gastric lymphoma. Gross characteristics and histology

    Gastrointest. Endosc.

    (1974)
  • C. Nobre-Leitao et al.

    Treatment of gastric MALT lymphoma by Helicobacter pylori eradication: a study controlled by endoscopic ultrasonography

    Am. J. Gastroenterol.

    (1998)
  • M. Okada et al.

    Gastritis cystica profunda presenting as giant gastric mucosal folds: the role of endoscopic ultrasonography and mucosectomy in the diagnostic work-up

    Gastrointest. Endosc.

    (1994)
  • M. Sackmann et al.

    Regression of gastric MALT lymphoma after eradication of Helicobacter pylori is predicted by endosonographic staging

    Gastroenterology

    (1997)
  • Y. Songur et al.

    Endosonographic evaluation of giant gastric folds

    Gastrointest. Endosc.

    (1995)
  • T.L. Tio et al.

    Endosonography in the clinical staging of esophagogastric carcinoma

    Gastrointest. Endosc.

    (1990)
  • T.L. Tio et al.

    Endoscopic ultrasonography of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the stomach

    Gastroenterology

    (1986)
  • T.L. Tio

    Large gastric folds evaluated by endoscopic ultrasonography

    Gastrointest. Endosc. Clin. N. Am.

    (1995)
  • S.J. Winawer et al.

    Endoscopic diagnosis of advanced gastric cancer

    Gastroenterology

    (1975)
  • T. Aibe et al.

    Endoscopic ultrasonography of lymphnodes surrounding the upper Gl tract

    Scand. J. Gastroenterol.

    (1986)
  • C. Avunduk et al.

    Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with large gastric folds: evaluation and follow-up with endoscopic ultrasound before and after antimicrobial therapy

    Am. J. Gastroenterol.

    (1995)
  • L. Bolondi et al.

    Primary gastric lymphoma versus gastric carcinoma: endoscopic US evaluation

    Radiology

    (1987)
  • J.F. Botet et al.

    Endoscopic sonography of the gastrointestinal tract

    Am. J. Roentgenol.

    (1991)
  • G. Caletti et al.

    Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of gastric cancer and lymphoma

    Surgery

    (1993)
  • G.C. Caletti et al.

    Staging of gastric cancer by means of endoscopic ultrasonography

    Gastroenterology

    (1983)
  • G.C. Caletti et al.

    Guillotine needle biopsy as a supplement to endosonography in the diagnosis of gastric submucosal tumors

    Endoscopy

    (1991)
  • Cited by (45)

    • Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma and Marginal Zone Lymphoma

      2019, Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      An adequate number of biopsies should be obtained during this procedure. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) could be an option to assess the depth of involvement in cases of GI EMZL. 37 An exhaustive physical examination with special attention to peripheral lymph nodes and the abdomen should be performed.

    • Endoscopic Ultrasound in Esophageal and Gastric Cancer

      2018, Endosonography, Fourth Edition
    • Use of Endoscopic Ultrasound to Evaluate Large Gastric Folds: Features Predictive of Malignancy

      2015, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report a cutoff value for gastric wall thickness that predicts malignant disease. A non-preserved wall layer structure is regarded as an important EUS finding predictive of malignant disease (Caletti et al. 2000). However, to date, there are no studies that associate non-preserved wall layer structure with malignant disease in patients with large gastric folds.

    • EUS in the Evaluation of Gastric Tumors

      2014, Endosonography, Third edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text