Elsevier

The Lancet Oncology

Volume 12, Issue 6, June 2011, Pages 551-558
The Lancet Oncology

Fast track — Articles
Baseline faecal occult blood concentration as a predictor of incident colorectal neoplasia: longitudinal follow-up of a Taiwanese population-based colorectal cancer screening cohort

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70101-2Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Despite widespread use of the immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT), little is known about the subsequent risk of developing colorectal neoplasia for participants with negative iFOBT results. We investigated whether the concentration of faecal haemoglobin at the first screen is predictive of the subsequent incidence of colorectal neoplasia in those with a negative screening result.

Methods

Between 2001 and 2007, we did a prospective cohort study within the Keelung community-based iFOBT screening programme for residents aged 40–69 years, using a cutoff faecal haemoglobin concentration of 100 ng/mL to classify attendees as negative and positive groups for further clinical investigations. 44 324 participants with negative findings and 1668 with a positive result at the first screen (854 non-referrals who refused colonoscopy and 814 with a false-positive result as assessed by colonoscopy) were followed up to ascertain cases of colorectal neoplasia. We investigated the association between baseline faecal haemoglobin concentration and risk of incident colorectal neoplasia, after adjusting for possible confounders.

Findings

Median follow-up was 4·39 years (IQR 2·53–6·12) for all 45 992 participants, during which the incidence of colorectal neoplasia increased from 1·74 per 1000 person-years for those with baseline faecal haemoglobin concentration 1–19 ng/mL, to 7·08 per 1000 person-years for those with a baseline concentration of 80–99 ng/mL. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) increased from 1·43 (95% CI 1·08–1·88) for baseline faecal haemoglobin concentration of 20–39 ng/mL, to 3·41 (2·02–5·75) for a baseline concentration of 80–99 ng/mL (trend test p<0·0001), relative to 1–19 ng/mL. These results did not change when we included repeated iFOBT measurements. Non-referrals had the highest risk of incident colorectal neoplasia (adjusted HR 8·46 [6·08–11·76]).

Interpretation

Quantitative faecal haemoglobin concentration at first screening predicts subsequent risk of incident colorectal neoplasia. During follow-up, risk stratification based on faecal haemoglobin could help clinicians, with particular attention being paid to those with higher initial faecal haemoglobin concentrations, especially those just under the threshold taken to indicate presence of colorectal neoplasia.

Funding

None.

Introduction

Population-based screening for colorectal cancer by use of the immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT, also known as the faecal immunochemical test [FIT]) is widely done;1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 however, particularly in large population-based screening programmes, those with negative findings at the first screen (eg, faecal haemoglobin concentration <100 ng/mL with the OC-Sensor method) often consider themselves at low risk of developing colorectal neoplasia. These individuals are less likely to participate in subsequent screening rounds, as noted in several colorectal cancer screening programmes.11, 12, 13, 14, 15 Moreover, uptake of repeated screening is generally low in Asian countries, where population-based iFOBT screening has recently begun.3, 16 Participants who have a negative result at the first screen and do not attend further screening (non-attenders) may go on to develop symptomatic colorectal cancer, because the disease can arise at any time or because a tumour could have been missed. Previous studies reported detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia in around 15–30% of those with faecal haemoglobin concentrations between 50 ng/mL and 100 ng/mL at the first screen who were referred for colonoscopy.4, 6, 10

Therefore, it is worth investigating whether participants who have a negative result at the first screen can be stratified according to subsequent risk of developing colorectal adenoma and cancer. Faecal haemoglobin concentration is currently used to determine whether participants are referred for further clinical investigation. We propose use of faecal haemoglobin concentration to predict subsequent incidence of adenoma and colorectal cancer in individuals who have a negative result at the first screen of a population-based programme (including new cases and false negatives). We postulated that the higher the concentration of faecal haemoglobin, the higher the subsequent risk of developing adenoma and colorectal cancer. We also assessed whether the subsequent risk of colorectal neoplasia was increased for individuals with faecal haemoglobin concentrations of 100 ng/mL or higher at the first screen, but who did not attend colonoscopy when invited (non-referrals), or in whom colonoscopy did not find disease (false-positives), because in neither case is the natural progression of disease interrupted by treatment. Population-based screening for colorectal cancer, using iFOBT and faecal haemoglobin concentration higher than 100 ng/mL as the cutoff for diagnostic testing, was initiated as part of the Keelung Community-based Integrated Screening programme (KCIS), in Keelung, Taiwan, in 1999.17 Long-term follow-up is now available for this study, providing a unique opportunity to study the association between faecal haemoglobin concentration and subsequent risk of colorectal cancer and adenoma in individuals with a negative result at the first screen, and to quantify the subsequent risk in non-referrals and false-positives.

Section snippets

Study population and screening protocol

Our data are derived from a community-based colorectal cancer screening programme with iFOBT, where participants attended for at least one screening round. This programme was part of the KCIS, a multiple-screening programme for five neoplastic diseases (colorectal, liver, breast, cervical, and oral cancer) and three non-neoplastic diseases (hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidaemia). Details of the study design, target population, screening process, handling of referrals, and surveillance

Results

Figure 1 summarises the process of iFOBT screening, the number of screen-detected cases at subsequent screens by regularity of the screening interval (regular vs irregular), and number of interval cancers (by time since last negative screen). Of the 56 025 invited participants, 46 355 attended the first screen (82·7% attendance rate). 363 participants with faecal haemoglobin concentration of 100 ng/mL or higher who were diagnosed with adenoma (n=311) or invasive carcinoma (n=52) as a result of

Discussion

This population-based prospective study, done within a community screening programme, showed that for participants with a negative iFOBT result at the first screen, higher baseline faecal haemoglobin concentrations were associated with an increased risk of incident colorectal neoplasia. Participants who had a positive iFOBT result at first screen but who refused colonoscopy had the highest risk, whereas false-positive cases had the lowest risk (although the HR for this last group was not

References (22)

  • AR Neilson et al.

    Determinants of persistent compliance with screening for colorectal cancer

    Soc Sci Med

    (1995)
  • JH Jansen

    Participation in the first and second round of a mass-screening for colorectal cancer

    Soc Sci Med

    (1984)
  • YH Chiu et al.

    Health information system for community-based multiple screening in Keelung, Taiwan (Keelung Community-based Integrated Screening No 3)

    Int J Med Inform

    (2006)
  • G Castiglione et al.

    Basic variables at different positivity thresholds of a quantitative immunochemical test for faecal occult blood

    J Med Screen

    (2002)
  • G Grazzini et al.

    Colorectal cancer screening programme by faecal occult blood test in Tuscany: first round results

    Eur J Cancer Prev

    (2004)
  • KC Yang et al.

    Colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood test within a multiple disease screening programme: an experience from Keelung, Taiwan

    J Med Screen

    (2006)
  • Z Levi et al.

    A quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood test for colorectal neoplasia

    Ann Intern Med

    (2007)
  • LG van Rossum et al.

    Cutoff value determines the performance of a semi-quantitative immunochemical faecal occult blood test in a colorectal cancer screening programme

    Br J Cancer

    (2009)
  • L Hol et al.

    Screening for colorectal cancer: random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing at different cut-off levels

    Br J Cancer

    (2009)
  • L Hol et al.

    Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy

    Gut

    (2010)
  • A Parra-Blanco et al.

    Diagnostic accuracy of immunochemical versus guaiac faecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening

    J Gastroenterol

    (2010)
  • Cited by (85)

    • Faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin: Analytical challenges and potential solutions

      2021, Clinica Chimica Acta
      Citation Excerpt :

      Individuals with a f-Hb that is above the examinational limit of quantitation (but below the threshold applied for follow-up), have a higher risk of future advanced neoplasia compared to those with a f-Hb below the limit of detection. This has been observed both in screening programmes and in FIT used in post-polypectomy surveillance [7-12]. Whilst the clinical utility of FIT is well recognised, there has been very little attention focused on the examination aspects of the investigation.

    • Effect of Sex, Age, and Positivity Threshold on Fecal Immunochemical Test Accuracy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

      2019, Gastroenterology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Six were at high risk because they used frozen stool samples.8,32,36,41–43 Numerous articles had “patient selection” applicability concerns, with 10 articles explicitly including patients with a family history of CRC22,24,35,38,42,44–48 and 6 articles’ patients either younger than 40 years or older than 80 years.38,44,46,49–51 Three articles were rated as low risk in all risk of bias and applicability domains.39,40,52

    • Towards risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening. Adding risk factors to the fecal immunochemical test: Evidence, evolution and expectations

      2019, Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although some variation in reporting was present, large risk differences were obtained by these models, from a significant odds ratio increase of 1.434 per 1 μgHB/g unit increase in FIT (starting from 20μgHB/g to 200μgHB/g) result(Cooper et al., 2017) to a significant odds ratio of 71.2 when comparing the lowest and highest result of FIT(Stegeman et al., 2014). In addition, multiple studies showed an association between increasing quantitative FIT results and more severe colonoscopy findings (Fig. 3)(Auge et al., 2014; van de Veerdonk et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2011). 7 out of the 11 models included lifestyle factors in this study, most commonly BMI and/or smoking.

    • Usefulness of risk stratification models for colorectal cancer based on fecal hemoglobin concentration and clinical risk factors

      2019, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Finally, the sixth subgroup was regarded as very high risk for CRC (11.1%; 95% CI, 8.5%-14.3%). FIT is a clinically useful and noninvasive CRC screening method adopted in many countries worldwide.3,11,20,21 FIT binary results can guide clinical decision-making.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text