Elsevier

Anaerobe

Volume 45, June 2017, Pages 86-100
Anaerobe

Inhibition of spore germination, growth, and toxin activity of clinically relevant C. difficile strains by gut microbiota derived secondary bile acids

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.03.004Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Gut microbiota derived secondary bile acids (SBAs) altered the C. difficile life cycle of seven clinically relevant strains.

  • Inhibition of TCA mediated spore germination and outgrowth, and growth kinetics with SBAs was dose dependent.

  • Specific SBAs altered C. difficile growth kinetics, yet toxin activity was similar to controls or higher.

Abstract

The changing epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection over the past decades presents a significant challenge in the management of C. difficile associated diseases. The gastrointestinal tract microbiota provides colonization resistance against C. difficile, and growing evidence suggests that gut microbial derived secondary bile acids (SBAs) play a role. We hypothesized that the C. difficile life cycle; spore germination and outgrowth, growth, and toxin production, of strains that vary by age and ribotype will differ in their sensitivity to SBAs. C. difficile strains R20291 and CD196 (ribotype 027), M68 and CF5 (017), 630 (012), BI9 (001) and M120 (078) were used to define taurocholate (TCA) mediated spore germination and outgrowth, growth, and toxin activity in the absence and presence of gut microbial derived SBAs (deoxycholate, isodeoxycholate, lithocholate, isolithocholate, ursodeoxycholate, ω-muricholate, and hyodeoxycholate) found in the human and mouse large intestine. C. difficile strains varied in their rates of germination, growth kinetics, and toxin activity without the addition of SBAs. C. difficile M120, a highly divergent strain, had robust germination, growth, but significantly lower toxin activity compared to other strains. Many SBAs were able to inhibit TCA mediated spore germination and outgrowth, growth, and toxin activity in a dose dependent manner, but the level of inhibition and resistance varied across all strains and ribotypes. This study illustrates how clinically relevant C. difficile strains can have different responses when exposed to SBAs present in the gastrointestinal tract.

Introduction

Clostridium difficile is a Gram-positive, spore forming, anaerobic bacillus and is the leading cause of nosocomial infection worldwide [1]. In the United States half a million cases of C. difficile infection (CDI) and 29,000 deaths are reported annually [2], [3]. Clinical disease can range from mild or moderate diarrhea to fulminant and pseudomembranous colitis and even death [4], [5]. Incidence, severity, mortality, and recurrence rates of CDI have increased during the past 15 years. The changing global epidemiology of CDI has been largely attributed to the emergence of epidemic C. difficile strains, PCR ribotype 027 and 078. Other PCR ribotypes such as 001, 053, and 106 have also been associated with outbreaks and severe cases [6]. The epidemic strains are often associated with increased production of toxins A and B, increased resistance to fluoroquinolone antibiotics, and production of binary toxin [7]. A recent advisory from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) puts C. difficile on the urgent threat list, and warns of increased incidence of community acquired CDI in individuals who have not been exposed to hospital settings or antibiotic therapy. This is a population that was previously considered low risk [8]. Due to the dynamic epidemiology of C. difficile, it is important to phenotypically characterize both historic and current epidemic strains to define how they adapt to different environmental pressures, especially those found in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.

Antibiotics significantly disrupt the indigenous gut microbiota, but they also alter the host and gut microbiota derived bile acids allowing for C. difficile colonization [9], [10], [11], [12]. Bile acids are end products of cholesterol metabolism and essential for lipoprotein, glucose, drug, and energy metabolism [13], [14]. Primary bile acids made by humans are cholate (CA) and chenodeoxycholate (CDCA). These bile acids are further conjugated with either taurine or glycine. Mice are slightly different, where a significant amount of CDCA is converted by the host into α-muricholate (αMCA) and β-muricholate (βMCA) [15]. Primary bile acids are released in response to food into the duodenum and a majority of them (∼95%) are reabsorbed in the terminal ileum, and returned to the liver via enterohepatic recirculation. Primary bile acids that reach the large intestine (∼5%) are acted upon by specific members of the gut microbiota and biotransformed via two enzymatic reactions, deconjugation and dehydroxylation, into secondary bile acids (SBAs), where they remain at relatively high concentrations (200–1000 μM) [16]. There are approximately 50 different chemically distinct SBAs found in human large intestine [17]. Fig. 1 illustrates the most abundant SBAs: deoxycholate (DCA), lithocholate (LCA), and ursodeoxycholate (UDCA) [16]. Isodeoxycholate (iDCA) and isolithocholate (iLCA) are 3β-OH epimers of DCA and LCA [16], [18]. Additionally, ω-muricholate (ωMCA) an epimer of βMCA and hyodeoxycholate (HDCA) are only present in mice [19], [20], [21]. The physiologically relevant concentrations of SBAs in the human and mouse large intestine, and the concentrations used in the present study are presented in Table 1.

C. difficile spores require specific bile acids and amino acids for germination into metabolically active vegetative cells [22]. Primary bile acids such as taurocholate (TCA) and CA are present in high concentrations in the distal small intestine and are primary germinants for C. difficile spores along with glycine [16]. However, CDCA, another primary bile acid, is able to inhibit C. difficile germination [23]. Recent studies show that depletion of the microbial members responsible for converting primary bile acids to SBAs reduces resistance against C. difficile in the large intestine [24], [25], [26], [27]. There are studies showing that the SBAs ωMCA, LCA, UDCA, and HDCA inhibit TCA mediated spore germination in C. difficile UK1, M68, and VPI 10463, and growth of strains CD196, UK14, UK1, M68, and VPI 10463 in vitro [11], [28], [29]. However, there are fewer studies showing how SBAs alter all stages of the C. difficile life cycle (spore germination, growth, and toxin activity) of clinically relevant epidemic, non-epidemic, historic, and more recent strains.

Past studies have shown that spore germination rates of clinically relevant C. difficile isolates varied when exposed to primary bile acid TCA and CDCA, a known inhibitor of spore germination in vitro [23], [30]. Therefore, it is conceivable that differences may also exist in the inhibitory effect of SBAs on not only spore germination, but on other stages of the C. difficile life cycle including growth, and toxin activity, which mediates disease. We hypothesize that spore germination, growth, and toxin activity of clinically diverse C. difficile strains will vary in their sensitivity to SBAs. Here we show the differences in the inhibitory effect of SBAs; specifically DCA, iDCA, LCA, iLCA, UDCA, ωMCA, and HDCA, on TCA mediated spore germination and outgrowth, growth, and toxin activity of clinically relevant C. difficile strains R20291 and CD196 (ribotype 027), M68 and CF5 (017), 630 (012), BI9 (001) and M120 (078). Defining how SBAs affect different stages of the C. difficile life cycle in clinically relevant strains will help us understand how different strains are able to survive and cause disease in the GI tract. It will also allow us to better understand how these SBAs could be used as potential therapeutics against CDI.

Section snippets

Strain selection

C. difficile strains were provided by Trevor Lawley by way of Joe Sorg and Aimee Shen. The origin and ribotype information for each strain is listed in Table 2. C. difficile strains were selected from a range of PCR ribotypes that included epidemic (R20291 [31] and M68 [32]), non-epidemic (CD196 [31] and CF5 [32]), historic (CD196, CF5 and 630 [33]), current (R20291, M68 and BI9 [32]), and a genetically divergent strain (M120 [32]).

Microbial derived secondary bile acid selection

The bile acids [ωMCA (Steraloids, Catalog ID No. C1888-000),

Diverse C. difficile clinical strains vary in TCA mediated spore germination and outgrowth, growth kinetics, and toxin activity

In this study all bile acids were dissolved in 100% ethanol, so positive controls include the addition of ethanol without the addition of SBAs to ensure that ethanol alone does not inhibit C. difficile, Fig. 2A (+TCA, red bar), Fig. 2B (solid lines), and Fig. 2C (EthOH, red bar). There was no significant difference in germination rates between spores supplemented with and without ethanol with TCA (data not shown). All C. difficile strains exhibit more than 70% spore germination and outgrowth

Discussion/conclusion

Seven different gut microbial derived secondary bile acids (DCA, iDCA, LCA, iLCA, UDCA, ωMCA, and HDCA) were tested at physiologically relevant concentrations in vitro for their ability to differentially impact spore germination and outgrowth, growth kinetics, and toxin activity of seven clinically relevant and diverse C. difficile strains (R20291, CD196, M68, CF5, BI9, M120, and 630). Comparisons of the effects of individual SBAs between strains was not presented due to substantial differences

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Trevor Lawley, Aimee Chen, and Joe Sorg for providing the Theriot lab with the C. difficile clinical strains tested in this manuscript. JAW is funded by Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award Research Training grant T32OD011130 by NIH. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R35GM119438 (CMT) and by career development award in

References (45)

  • F.C. Lessa et al.

    Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2015)
  • C.D.C. Control, Prevention. Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2013

    (2013)
  • J. Lucado et al.

    Clostridium Difficile Infections (CDI) in Hospital Stays, 2009

    (2012)
  • D.A. Leffler et al.

    Clostridium difficile infection

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2015)
  • M. Rupnik et al.

    Clostridium difficile infection: new developments in epidemiology and pathogenesis

    Nat. Rev. Microbiol.

    (2009)
  • L.C. McDonald et al.

    An epidemic, toxin gene–variant strain of Clostridium difficile

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2005)
  • C.f.D. Control, prevention. Severe Clostridium difficile-associated disease in populations previously at low risk–four states, 2005

    MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.

    (2005)
  • A.E. Reeves et al.

    The interplay between microbiome dynamics and pathogen dynamics in a murine model of Clostridium difficile infection

    Gut Microbes

    (2011)
  • C.G. Buffie et al.

    Profound alterations of intestinal microbiota following a single dose of clindamycin results in sustained susceptibility to Clostridium difficile-induced colitis

    Infect. Immun.

    (2012)
  • C.M. Theriot et al.

    Antibiotic-induced alterations of the gut microbiota alter secondary bile acid production and allow for Clostridium difficile spore germination and outgrowth in the large intestine

    mSphere

    (2016)
  • D.W. Russell

    The enzymes, regulation, and genetics of bile acid synthesis

    Annu. Rev. Biochem.

    (2003)
  • J.P. Hamilton et al.

    Human cecal bile acids: concentration and spectrum

    Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.

    (2007)
  • Cited by (152)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text