Original article
Alimentary tract
Esophageal Distensibility as a Measure of Disease Severity in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.020Get rights and content

Background & Aims

The aim of this study was to assess whether measurements of esophageal distensibility, made by high-resolution impedance planimetry, correlated with important clinical outcomes in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis.

Methods

Seventy patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (50 men; age, 18–68 y) underwent endoscopy with esophageal biopsy collection and high-resolution impedance planimetry using the functional lumen-imaging probe. The patients were followed up prospectively for an average of 9.2 months (range, 3–14 mo), and the risk of food impaction, requirement for dilation, and symptom severity during the follow-up period was determined from medical records. Esophageal distensibility metrics and the severity of mucosal eosinophilia at baseline were compared between patients presenting with and without food impaction and those requiring or not requiring esophageal dilation. Logistic regression and stratification assessments were used to assess the predictive value of esophageal distensibility metrics in assessing risk of food impaction, the need for dilation, and continued symptoms.

Results

Patients with prior food impactions had significantly lower distensibility plateau (DP) values than those with solid food dysphagia alone. In addition, patients sustaining food impaction and requiring esophageal dilation during the follow-up period had significantly lower DP values than those who did not. The severity of mucosal eosinophilia did not correlate with risk for food impaction, the requirement for dilation during follow-up evaluation, or DP values.

Conclusions

Reduced esophageal distensibility predicts risk for food impaction and the requirement for esophageal dilation in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. The severity of mucosal eosinophilia was not predictive of these outcomes and had a poor correlation with esophageal distensibility.

Section snippets

Subjects

Seventy-seven patients (55 men; age, 18–68 y), who presented to the Esophageal Center at Northwestern from July 2009 to May 2012 with food impaction, dysphagia, chest pain, or heartburn, and histology reporting 15 or more eosinophils/hpf (magnification, 0.196 mm2),10 were enrolled to assess the biomechanical properties of the esophageal wall.9 After a trial of PPI therapy, a second endoscopy with repeated biopsies and high-resolution impedance planimetry using the FLIP device was performed to

Baseline Clinical Data

Seventy patients were included for analysis (4 patients had technically limited studies and 3 subjects were lost to follow-up evaluation). Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. All patients had a trial of PPI therapy before the FLIP was performed. At the time of the second endoscopy with the FLIP procedure, 21 patients were noted to have fewer than 15 eosinophils/hpf in both the proximal and distal biopsy locations and they were classified as PPI-R-EE. The remaining 49 patients fit the

Discussion

This study assessed whether measurements of esophageal distensibility with the FLIP during endoscopy correlated with clinically relevant outcomes in EoE patients. The major findings were that reduced esophageal distensibility (DP < 225 mm2) was associated with an increased risk of food impaction and requirement of esophageal dilation during a 4- to 12-month follow-up period. In addition, there was a relationship between DP and symptom score during follow-up evaluation suggesting that this

Cited by (224)

  • Endoscopic Features of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases

    2024, Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America
View all citing articles on Scopus

Conflicts of interest The authors disclose no conflicts.

Funding Supported by R01 DK079902 (J.E.P.) and R01 DK56033 (P.J.K.) from the National Institutes of Health.

View full text