Anti Tumour Treatment
Chemotherapy of advanced gastric cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2007.01.004Get rights and content

Summary

Gastric cancer is the second most frequent cancer in the world. Approximately 84% of patients with gastric cancer will have advanced disease and median survival of these patients without chemotherapy is only 3–4 months. “Classical” chemotherapy regimens, mainly CF (cisplatin plus infusional 5FU) and ECF (cisplatin plus infusional 5FU plus Epirubicin) obtain responses in 20–40% of the patients and improve quality of life. Nevertheless, duration of these responses is short with very few complete responses. Median time to tumor progression (TTP) with these regimens is only about 4–5 months and median survival does not exceed 7–10 months. Moreover, benefit seems to be limited to patients with good performance status and treatment toxicity and discomfort are not negligible, specially that of regimens with cisplatin or infusional 5FU. Trying to improve these results, the incorporation of new drugs has been explored. Among the new combinations, the more developed ones are those with Docetaxel (DCF), oxaliplatin (EOX, FLO), Capecitabine (EOX, cisplatin-Xeloda) and irinotecan (ILF). We have final results from Phase III trials that suggest that all these regimens could have a role in the treatment of these patients but survival is still very poor and toxicity remains important. It would be interesting to investigate other new combinations and the incorporation of drugs directed against new therapeutic targets in this setting. It would be of utmost interest that these clinical trials would also explore clinical and molecular prognostic and predictive factors.

Introduction

Gastric cancer is the second most frequent cancer in the world. In Europe, 95,000 new cases were diagnosed in the year 2000.1 During that same year, 78,000 patients (83% of the incidence) died due to it. There has been a decrease in the incidence of distal gastric adenocarcinoma in the West in recent years. On the contrary, proximal and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas are increasing.

Advanced gastric cancer is considered to be that diagnosed as non-resectable disease, either because it is locally advanced (30% of the cases at diagnosis) or that presenting as metastatic disease (another 30%). Also included in this definition are cases of relapse after surgery (60% of the resected). Thus, overall, approximately 84% of patients with gastric cancer will have advanced disease. Even though metastatic, relapsed and locally advanced patients are often enrolled in clinical trials. The prognosis of the locally advanced cancer, although also bad, is slightly better; median survival of 7–10 months in relapsed or metastatic patients treated with chemotherapy and 12–15 months in the locally advanced in this setting. In this subgroup, some type of loco-regional radical treatment can be included, specially if there is a response after a systemic treatment. Thus, it would be best to avoid mixing both types of patients in the same trial or, at least, to analyze them separately.

Section snippets

Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer

Four phase III studies that compared combination chemotherapy versus support therapy were published in the 1990s.2, 3, 4, 5 A significant increase in median survival in favour of patients who received chemotherapy (3–4 months vs 7–10 months) was demonstrated in all of them. They also obtained a significant improvement in quality of life. Of note is the fact observed in the Glimelius et al. study5: chemotherapy benefits were lost if its administration was delayed until the symptoms appeared

Combinations without cisplatin

The use of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was begun in these patients in the 1960s. During the 1970s and 1980s, several combinations based on 5-FU were developed, the most extended being FAM (5-FU, adriamycin and mitomycin-C), ELF (etoposide, leucovorin and 5-FU) and FAMTX (5-FU, adriamycin and methotrexate). This was considered as the reference regimen by most of the authors as a result of the publication in 1991 of a phase III study conducted by EORTC that compared FAM with FAMTX6 and that

Combination regimens with new chemotherapy

Given the limitations of the classical chemotherapy combinations in this setting, next step was to examine the role of new chemotherapy. Specifically and above all, docetaxel, irinotecan (CPT-11), oxaliplatin, paclitaxel and the oral fluoropyrimidines (capecitabine, S1 and UFT) were studied.

Drugs directed against new targets

There are preclinical data suggesting the potential utility of different therapeutic strategies against new targets in these tumors: receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) inhibitors, MMP inhibitors, proteosome inhibitors, etc. Given the limited usefulness of chemotherapy in these patients, it would be essential to conduct a proper clinical development of these new targeted drugs.

From among the new targeted drugs the more developed ones in gastric cancer are the ones directed against the Tyrosine

Conclusions on the integration of new drugs in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer

Incorporation of docetaxel, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, paclitaxel, and of oral fluoropyrimidines (capecitabine, S1 and UFT) in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer are being studied. Phase II trials suggest an interesting activity of different combinations in first and in second line treatment in these patients but there are needed phase III trials to clearly establish their role in this setting. We already have final results from Phase III trials suggesting some new combinations with

References (85)

  • S. Pyrhonen et al.

    Randomised comparison of fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and methotrexate (FEMTX) plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with non-resectable gastric cancer

    Br J Cancer

    (1995)
  • A.M. Murad et al.

    Modified therapy with 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate in advanced gastric cancer

    Cancer

    (1993)
  • Schethauer W, Kornek G, Zeh B. Palliative chemotherapy vs supportive care in patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a...
  • J.A. Wils et al.

    Sequential high-dose methotrexate and fluorouracil combined with doxorubicin – a step ahead in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cooperative Group

    J Clin Oncol

    (1991)
  • A. Webb et al.

    Randomized trial comparing epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate in advanced esophagogastric cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (1997)
  • Massuti B, Cervantes A, Aranda E, Antón A, Abad A, Rivera F et al. A phase III multicenter randomized trial in advanced...
  • A. Ohtsu et al.

    Randomized phase III trial of fluorouracil alone versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus uracil and tegafur plus mitomycin in patients with unresectable, advanced gastric cancer: The Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG9205)

    J Clin Oncol

    (2003)
  • U. Vanhoefer et al.

    Final results of a randomized phase III trial of sequential high-dose methotrexate, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin versus etoposide, leucovorin, and fluorouracil versus infusional fluorouracil and cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer: a trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group

    J Clin Oncol

    (2000)
  • N.K. Kim et al.

    A phase III randomized study of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin C versus 5-fluorouracil alone in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer

    Cancer

    (1993)
  • D. Kelsen et al.

    FAMTX versus etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin: a random assignment trial in gastric cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (1992)
  • J. Wils

    The treatment of advanced gastric cancer

    Semin Oncol

    (1996)
  • P. Ross et al.

    Prospective randomized trial comparing mitomycin, cisplatin, and protracted venous-infusion fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) With epirubicin, cisplatin, and PVI 5-FU in advanced esophagogastric cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2002)
  • A.D. Wagner et al.

    Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data

    J Clin Oncol

    (2006)
  • L.A. Wood et al.

    Chemotherapy in metastatic gastric cancer: population-based perceptions and practice patterns of medical oncologists

    Br J Cancer

    (2004)
  • J.A. Ajani et al.

    Phase II multi-institutional randomized trial of docetaxel plus cisplatin with or without fluorouracil in patients with untreated, advanced gastric, or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma

    J Clin Oncol

    (2005)
  • E. Van Custem et al.

    Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V 325 Study Group

    J Clin Oncol

    (2006)
  • Fahlke et al.

    Docetaxel-cisplatin (DC) versus 5-fluorouracil–leucovorin–cisplatin (FLC) as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer: preliminary safety results of a Phase III study

    Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol

    (2005)
  • A.D. Roth et al.

    Docetaxel-cisplatin-5FU (TCF) versus docetaxel-cisplatin (TC) versus epirubicin–cisplatin-5FU (ECF) as systemic treatment for advanced gastric carcinoma (AGC): a randomized phase II trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK)

    J Clin Oncol

    (2004)
  • Y.H. Park et al.

    A phase II study of capecitabine and docetaxel combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer

    Br J Cancer

    (2004)
  • P.C. Thuss-Patience et al.

    Capecitabine and Docetaxel in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma, an ongoing phase II study

    Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol

    (2005)
  • G. Catalano et al.

    Phase II study of weekly docetaxel and capecitabine in patients with metastatic gastric cancer (GC)

    Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol

    (2005)
  • Y.K. Kang et al.

    A phase I/II trial of docetaxel, capecitabine, and cisplatin as a first line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2004)
  • T. Takayama et al.

    Phase I/II study of docetaxel, CDDP and S-1 in unresectable advanced gastric cancer

    Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol

    (2005)
  • K. Yoshida et al.

    Phase I study of combination therapy with S-1 and docetaxel (TXT) for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer

    Anticancer Res

    (2004)
  • S.H. Lee et al.

    Combination chemotherapy with epirubicin, docetaxel and cisplatin (EDP) in metastatic or recurrent, unresectable gastric cancer

    Br J Cancer

    (2004)
  • A. Jatoi et al.

    A phase II trial of docetaxel and CPT-11 in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, and gastric cardia

    Int J Gastrointest Cancer

    (2002)
  • F. Giuliani et al.

    Docetaxel as salvage therapy in advanced gastric cancer: a phase II study of the Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale (G.O.I.M.)

    Anticancer Res

    (2003)
  • U. Vanhoefer

    Phase II study of Docetaxel as second line chemotherapy (CT) in metastatic gastric cancer

    Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol

    (1999)
  • G. Schinzari et al.

    Docetaxel and oxaliplatin combination as second line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer

    Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol

    (2005)
  • Evans D, Miner T, Ng T, Akerman P, Harrington D, Martel D, Maia C, Cioffi W, Benton D, Safran H. A phase I/II study of...
  • O. Bouche et al.

    Randomized multicenter phase II trial of a biweekly regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin (LV5FU2), LV5FU2 plus cisplatin, or LV5FU2 plus irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric cancer: a Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive Group Study – FFCD 9803

    J Clin Oncol

    (2004)
  • M.H. Moehler et al.

    Safety and efficacy of CPT11/FA/5-FU (ILF) versus ELF in previously untreated advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction

    J Clin Oncol

    (2003)
  • Cited by (147)

    • Assessment of workplace environmental contamination and occupational exposure to cisplatin and doxorubicin aerosols during electrostatic pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy

      2021, European Journal of Surgical Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is a terminal illness that is treated with systemic chemotherapy and palliative care. Although the new chemotherapeutic agents and targeted therapies are more effective, their efficacy is hampered by heterogeneous drug distribution and poor tissue penetration in PM, preventing improvement in the overall survival of patients with unresectable PM [1,2]. Furthermore, intraperitoneal chemotherapy is designed to maximize the chemotherapeutic dose by delivering the antineoplastic drugs directly to the PM, while minimizing systemic toxicity [3].

    • Cisplatin induces chemoresistance through the PTGS2-mediated anti-apoptosis in gastric cancer

      2019, International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Gastric cancer (GC) with only 20–30% of 5-year survival rate is the second leading cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide (Rivera et al., 2007; Du et al., 2009; Forman and Burley, 2006; Waddell et al., 2014; Ferlay et al., 2010). Cisplatin is the effective chemotherapeutic agent widely applied for the treatment of GC (Rivera et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2018; Cunningham et al., 2006; Cats et al., 2018; Guo et al., 2018; Xin et al., 2018; Pasini and Fraccon, 2011). However, the chemoresistance of the GC cells exposed to cisplatin treatment becomes a significant impediment to the therapeutic efficacy, leading to the failure of chemotherapy (Wang et al., 2018; Kurtova et al., 2015).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text