Clinical Practice Guidelines
EASL–EORTC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2011.12.021Get rights and content

Introduction

EASL–EORTC Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) define the use of surveillance, diagnosis and therapeutic strategies recommended for patients with this type of cancer. This is the first European joint effort by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) to provide common guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. These guidelines update the recommendations reported by the EASL panel of experts in HCC published in 2001.1 Several clinical and scientific advances have occurred during the past decade and, thus, a modern version of the document is urgently needed.

The purpose of this document is to assist physicians, patients, health-care providers and health-policy makers from Europe and worldwide in the decision-making process according to evidence-based data. Users of these guidelines should be aware that the recommendations are intended to guide clinical practice in circumstances where all possible resources and therapies are available. Thus, they should adapt the recommendations to their local regulations and/or team capacities, infrastructure and cost–benefit strategies. Finally, this document sets out some recommendations that should be instrumental in advancing the research and knowledge of this disease and ultimately contribute to improve patient care.

The EASL–EORTC CPG on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma provide recommendations based on the level of evidence and the strength of the data (the classification of evidence is adapted from the National Cancer Institute2) (Table 1A) and the strength of recommendations following previously reported systems (GRADE systems) (Table 1B).

Section snippets

Clinical Practice Summary

The clinical practice guidelines below will give advice for up to date management of patients with HCC as well as providing an in-depth review of all the relevant data leading to the conclusions.

  • Surveillance

    • Patients at high risk for developing HCC should be entered into surveillance programs. Groups at high risk are depicted in Table 3 (evidence 1B/3A; recommendation 1A/B)

    • Surveillance should be performed by experienced personnel in all at-risk populations using abdominal ultrasound every 6

Epidemiology, risk factors and prevention

  • The incidence of HCC is increasing in Europe and worldwide

  • Vaccination against hepatitis B is recommended to all newborns and high risk groups (evidence: 2D; recommendation 1A)

  • Governmental health agencies should recommend policies for preventing HCV/HBV transmissions, encourage life styles preventing obesity and alcohol abuse (evidence 3A; recommendation 1A) and controlling metabolic conditions, such as diabetes (evidence 3; recommendation 2B)

  • In patients with chronic hepatitis, antiviral

Surveillance

  • Implementation of surveillance programmes to identify at-risk candidate populations and identification of biomarkers for early HCC detection are a major public health goal to decrease HCC-related deaths (evidence 1D; recommendation 1B).

    Government health policy and research agencies should address these needs

  • Patients at high risk for developing HCC should be entered into surveillance programmes. Groups at high risk are depicted in Table 3 (evidence 1B/3A; recommendation 1A/B)

  • Surveillance should

Diagnosis

  • Diagnosis of HCC is based on non-invasive criteria or pathology (evidence 2D; recommendation 1A).

  • Pathological diagnosis of HCC is based on the recommendations of the International Consensus Panel. Immunostaining for GPC3, HSP70 and glutamine synthetase and/or gene expression profiles (GPC3, LYVE1 and survivin) are recommended to differentiate high grade dysplastic nodules from early HCC (evidence 2D; recommendation 2B). Additional staining can be considered to detect progenitor cell features

Staging systems

  • Staging systems in HCC should define outcome prediction and treatment assignment. They should facilitate exchange of information, prognosis prediction and trial design. Due to the nature of HCC, the main prognostic variables are tumour stage, liver function and performance status.

  • The BCLC staging system is recommended for prognostic prediction and treatment allocation (evidence 2A; recommendation 1B). This staging system can be applied to most HCC patients, as long as specific considerations

Treatment

  • Treatment allocation is based on the BCLC allocation system, and the levels of evidence of treatments according to strength and magnitude of benefit are summarised in Fig. 4.

In oncology, the benefits of treatments should be assessed through randomised controlled trials and meta-analysis. Other sources of evidence, such as non-randomised clinical trials or observational studies are considered less robust. Few medical interventions have been thoroughly tested in HCC, in contrast with other

Resection

  • Resection is the first-line treatment option for patients with solitary tumours and very well-preserved liver function, defined as normal bilirubin with either hepatic venous pressure gradient ⩽10 mmHg or platelet count ⩾100,000 (evidence 2A; recommendation 1B) Anatomical resections are recommended (evidence 3A; recommendation 2C).

  • Additional indications for patients with multifocal tumours meeting Milan Criteria (⩽3 nodules ⩽3 cm) or with mild portal hypertension not suitable for liver

Liver transplantation

  • Liver transplantation is considered to be the first-line treatment option for patients with single tumours less than 5 cm or ⩽3 nodules ⩽3 cm (Milan criteria) not suitable for resection (evidence 2A; recommendation 1A).

  • Peri-operative mortality and one-year mortality are expected to be approximately 3% and ⩽10%, respectively.

  • Extension of tumour limit criteria for liver transplantation for HCC has not been established. Modest expansion of Milan criteria applying the “up-to-seven” in patients

Local ablation

  • Local ablation with radiofrequency or percutaneous ethanol injection is considered the standard of care for patients with BCLC 0-A tumours not suitable for surgery (evidence 2A; recommendation 1B).

    Other ablative therapies, such as microwave or cryoablation, are still under investigation.

  • Radiofrequency ablation is recommended in most instances as the main ablative therapy in tumours less than 5 cm due to a significantly better control of the disease (evidence 1iD; recommendation 1A).

    Ethanol

Chemoembolisation and transcatheter therapies

  • Chemoembolisation is recommended for patients with BCLC stage B, multinodular asymptomatic tumours without vascular invasion or extra hepatic spread (evidence 1iiA; recommendation 1A) The use of drug-eluting beads has shown similar response rates than gelfoam-lipiodol particles associated with less systemic adverse events (evidence 1D; recommendation 2B) Chemoembolisation is discouraged in patients with decompensated liver disease, advanced liver dysfunction, macroscopic invasion or

Systemic therapies

  • Sorafenib is the standard systemic therapy for HCC. It is indicated for patients with well-preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A class) and with advanced tumours (BCLC C) or those tumours progressing upon loco-regional therapies (evidence 1iA; recommendation 1A).

  • There are no clinical or molecular biomarkers available to identify the best responders to sorafenib (evidence 1A; recommendation 2A).

  • Systemic chemotherapy, tamoxifen, immunotherapy, anti-androgen, and herbal drugs are not recommended

Trial design

  • 1.

    The panel endorses the trial design and selection of end points for clinical trials in HCC proposed in previous JNCI guidelines (Fig. 5) and lists the high-end trials currently ongoing which, in case of demonstrating clinically relevant superiority vs. the standard of care, might change the current guidelines (Table 4).

  • 2.

    Assessment of response:

    • Assessment of response in HCC should be based on the modification of the RECIST criteria (mRECIST; Table 5) (recommendation 2B).

      Use of changes in serum

Final considerations

  • 1.

    The panel considers that collection of tissue and serum samples in research studies is highly desirable and recommended. Such biobanking should permit the achievement of two clinical goals:

    • Refinement of prognostication and BCLC staging system. Molecular data such as gene signatures (poor survival, EpCAM) or biomarkers (AFP, VEGF, Ang2 and miR26) have been shown to have independent prognostic significance and are likely to be incorporated into staging systems after external independent

Addendum

During the editing process of the guidelines additional information on two phase 3 RCT mentioned in Table 4 was reported.

  • 1.

    The study comparing brivanib vs. placebo in patients with advanced HCC failing or intolerant to sorafenib was reported not meeting the primary end-point survival. http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/email/alert (Jan 2012).

  • 2.

    The study comparing linifanib vs. sorafenib in first-line was halted by the DSMC at the interim analysis. (Abbott’s LiGHT (Linifanib Study M10-963)

Disclosures

These guidelines reflect the state of knowledge, current at the time of publication, on effective and appropriate care, as well as clinical consensus judgments when knowledge is lacking. The inevitable changes in the state of scientific information and technology mandate that periodic review, updating, and revisions will be needed. These guidelines do not apply to all patients, and each must be adapted and tailored to each individual patient. Proper use, adaptation modifications or decisions to

Conflict of interest

Josep M. Llovet has received research support, and/or lecture and/or consultant fees and/or took part in clinical trials for Bayer Pharmaceutical, BMS, Biocompatibles, Novartis, Abbot, Imclone, Jennerex. Michel Ducreux has received research support, and/or lecture fees and/or took part in clinical trials for Bayer and Abbot. Mauro Bernardi has nothing to disclose. Thierry de Baére has received lecture fees for Terumo, Biocompatibles, Bayer. Arian Di Bisceglie has received research support,

Acknowledgements

The contributors thank the EASL office and the Journal of Hepatology editorial office for editorial assistance.

References (360)

  • S. Nishiguchi et al.

    Randomised trial of effects of interferon-alpha on incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic active hepatitis C with cirrhosis

    Lancet

    (1995)
  • J. Bruix et al.

    EPIC3 Study Group. Maintenance therapy with peginterferon alfa-2b does not prevent hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C

    Gastroenterology

    (2011)
  • F.P. Sarasin et al.

    Cost-effectiveness of screening for detection of small hepatocellular carcinoma in western patients with Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis

    Am J Med

    (1996)
  • A. Sangiovanni et al.

    Increased survival of cirrhotic patients with a hepatocellular carcinoma detected during surveillance

    Gastroenterology

    (2004)
  • R.F. Velázquez et al.

    Prospective analysis of risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with liver cirrhosis

    Hepatology

    (2003)
  • G. Fattovich et al.

    Natural history of chronic hepatitis B: special emphasis on disease progression and prognostic factors

    J Hepatol

    (2008)
  • F.X. Bosch et al.

    Primary liver cancer: worldwide incidence and trends

    Gastroenterology

    (2004 Nov)
  • K. Yasui et al.

    Characteristics of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis who develop hepatocellular carcinoma

    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2011)
  • A. Craxì et al.

    Prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma

    Clin Liver Dis

    (2005)
  • P. Lampertico et al.

    Low resistance to adefovir combined with lamivudine: a 3-year study of 145 lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B patients

    Gastroenterology

    (2007)
  • L. Bolondi

    Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis

    J Hepatol

    (2003)
  • R. Lencioni et al.

    Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

    J Hepatol

    (2008)
  • J.A. Marrero et al.

    Des-gamma carboxyprothrombin can differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma from nonmalignant chronic liver disease in American patients

    Hepatology

    (2003)
  • B.J. McMahon et al.

    Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in Alaska natives infected with chronic hepatitis B: a 16-year population-based study

    Hepatology

    (2000)
  • A.M. Di Bisceglie et al.

    HALT-C Trial Group. Serum alpha-fetoprotein levels in patients with advanced hepatitis C: results from the HALT-C trial

    J Hepatol

    (2005)
  • F. Trevisani et al.

    Serum alpha-fetoprotein for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: influence of HbsAg and anti–HCV status

    J Hepatol

    (2001)
  • D. Pateron et al.

    Prospective study of screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in Caucasian patients with cirrhosis

    J Hepatol

    (1994)
  • M. Ebara et al.

    Natural history of minute hepatocellular carcinoma smaller than three centimetres complicating cirrhosis. A study in 22 patients

    Gastroenterology

    (1986)
  • J.C. Sheu et al.

    Growth rate of asymptomatic hepatocellular carcinoma and its clinical implications

    Gastroenterology

    (1985)
  • E. Santagostino et al.

    A 6-month versus a 12-month surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma in 559 hemophiliacs infected with the hepatitis C virus

    Blood

    (2003)
  • F. Trevisani et al.

    Semiannual and annual surveillance of cirrhotic patients for hepatocellular carcinoma: effects on cancer stage and patients survival (Italian experience)

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2002)
  • V. Santi et al.

    Italian Liver Cancer (ITA.LI.CA) Group. Semiannual surveillance is superior to annual surveillance for the detection of early hepatocellular carcinoma and patient survival

    J Hepatol

    (2010)
  • K.L. Andersson et al.

    Cost effectiveness of alternative surveillance strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis

    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2008)
  • J.M. Llovet et al.

    Hepatocellular carcinoma

    Lancet

    (2003)
  • National Cancer Institute. PDQ® Levels of Evidence for Adult and Pediatric Cancer Treatment Studies. Bethesda, MD:...
  • D.M. Parkin et al.

    Global cancer statistics, 2002

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2005)
  • IARC. Available from: http://www–dep.iarc.fr: [accessed November 1st,...
  • El-Serag HB, Mason AC. Rising incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. N Engl J Med...
  • H. Tanaka et al.

    Declining incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in Osaka, Japan from 1990 to 2003

    Ann Intern Med

    (2008)
  • C. Bosetti et al.

    Trends in mortality from hepatocellular carcinoma in Europe, 1980–2004

    Hepatology

    (2008)
  • A. Jemal et al.

    Cancer Statistics, 2008

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2008)
  • M.H. Chang et al.

    Taiwan Hepatoma Study Group. Decreased incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis B vaccinees: a 20-year follow-up study

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (2009)
  • A. Sangiovanni et al.

    The natural history of compensated cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus: a 17-year cohort study of 214 patients

    Hepatology

    (2006)
  • G. Ioannou et al.

    Incidence and predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis

    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2007)
  • R. Masuzaki et al.

    Prospective risk assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma development in patients with chronic hepatitis C by transient elastography

    Hepatology

    (2009)
  • K.S. Jung et al.

    Risk assessment of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma development using liver stiffness measurement (FibroScan)

    Hepatology

    (2011)
  • A.S. Lok

    Prevention of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma

    Gastroenterology

    (2004)
  • H.I. Yang et al.

    Taiwan Community-Based Cancer Screening Project Group. Hepatitis B e antigen and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma

    N Engl J Med

    (2002)
  • C.J. Chen et al.

    REVEAL–HBV Study Group. Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma across a biological gradient of serum hepatitis B virus DNA level

    JAMA

    (2006)
  • M.W. Yu et al.

    Hepatitis B virus genotype and DNA level and hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study in men

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (2005)
  • Cited by (408)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    These Guidelines were developed by the EASL and the EORTC and are published simultaneously in the Journal of Hepatology (volume 56, issue 4) and the European Journal of Cancer (volume 48, issue 5).
    Contributors: Chairmen: Josep M. Llovet (EASL); Michel Ducreux (EORTC). Clinical Practice Guidelines Members: Riccardo Lencioni; Adrian M. Di Bisceglie; Peter R. Galle; Jean Francois Dufour; Tim F. Greten; Eric Raymond; Tania Roskams; Thierry De Baere; Michel Ducreux and Vincenzo Mazzaferro. EASL Governing Board Representatives: Mauro Bernardi. Reviewers: Jordi Bruix; Massimo Colombo; Andrew Zhu.
    Correspondence to: EASL Office, 7 rue des Battoirs, CH 1205 Geneva, Switzerland. Tel.: +41 22 807 0360; fax: +41 22 328 0724.
    E-mail address: [email protected] (European Association for the Study of the Liver).

    View full text