Original article
Clinical endoscopy
EUS versus surgical cyst-gastrostomy for management of pancreatic pseudocysts

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.057Get rights and content

Background

Although EUS-guided cyst-gastrostomy is increasingly being performed, there are no studies that compare the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness with surgical cyst-gastrostomy.

Objectives

To compare the clinical outcomes of EUS-guided cyst-gastrostomy with surgical cyst-gastrostomy for the management of patients with uncomplicated pancreatic pseudocysts and to perform a cost analysis of each treatment modality.

Design

A retrospective case-controlled study.

Setting

A tertiary-referral center.

Patients

Consecutive patients with uncomplicated pancreatic pseudocysts managed by surgical and EUS-guided cyst-gastrostomy.

Methods

An independent observer blinded to all clinic outcomes matched each patient who underwent a surgical cyst-gastrostomy with 2 patients who underwent an EUS-guided cyst-gastrostomy for age, etiology of pancreatitis, and the size of the pseudocyst.

Main Outcome Measurements

Rates of treatment success, complications, and reinterventions; length of postprocedure hospital stay; and cost associated with each treatment modality.

Results

Ten patients (6 men; mean age 42.3 years, range 22-65 years) who underwent surgical cyst-gastrostomy were matched with 20 patients who underwent an EUS-guided cyst-gastrostomy. There were no significant differences in demographics, major comorbidities, and clinical characteristics between both cohorts. Although there were no significant differences in rates of treatment success (100% vs 95%, P = .36), procedural complications (none in either cohort), or reinterventions (10% vs 0%, P = .13) between surgery versus an EUS-guided cyst-gastrostomy, the mean length of a postprocedure hospital stay for an EUS-guided cyst-gastrostomy was significantly shorter than for surgical cyst-gastrostomy (2.65 vs 6.5 days, P = .008). The average direct cost per case for EUS-guided cyst-gastrostomy was significantly less when compared with surgical cyst-gastrostomy ($9077 vs $14,815, P = .01), which corresponded to a cost savings of $5738 per patient.

Limitations

Retrospective, nonrandomized design; patients with pancreatic abscess or necrosis were not evaluated; a limited sample size and a short duration of follow-up.

Conclusions

EUS-guided cyst-gastrostomy should be considered as a first-line treatment approach for patients with uncomplicated pancreatic pseudocysts, because the procedure is cost saving and is associated with a shorter length of a postprocedure hospital stay when compared with surgical cyst-gastrostomy. There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between both treatment modalities.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

A retrospective case-controlled study was conducted that included consecutive patients (>18 years of age) who underwent surgical cyst-gastrostomy and EUS-guided cyst-gastrostomy at a tertiary-referral center between July 2005 and June 2007. Patients underwent an EUS or a surgical cyst-gastrostomy based on the clinical service (medical vs surgical gastroenterology) to which they were admitted. Patients were identified from the surgical and endoscopy databases, and patient medical records and CTs

Results

Twenty-eight patients underwent surgical cyst-gastrostomy during the 2-year study period. Sixteen patients were excluded because of the presence of a pancreatic abscess or necrosis, and 2 patients were excluded because of Roux-en-Y cyst-gastrostomy. The remaining 10 patients with uncomplicated pancreatic pseudocysts were matched with 20 patients who underwent an EUS-guided cyst-gastrostomy. Three patients who underwent a surgical cyst-gastrostomy and 8 patients who underwent an EUS-guided

Discussion

In this study, the EUS-guided cyst-gastrostomy approach was associated with a shorter length of postprocedure hospital stay and was less costly when compared with surgical cyst-gastrostomy. Also, the clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the 2 cohorts of patients.

Increasing experience with endoscopic and EUS-guided pseudocyst drainage has led to its use even in complex clinical settings such as pancreatic necrosis and multiple pseudocysts.17, 18 In addition, these

Cited by (0)

See CME section; p. 731.

View full text