Liver macrophages display a remarkable heterogeneity, reflecting their developmental origin (resident Kupffer cells and infiltrating monocytes) and their differentiation (e.g. inflammatory or anti-inflammatory) in response to microenvironmental signals (e.g. danger signals, phagocytosis of cellular debris)
ReviewTargeting hepatic macrophages to treat liver diseases
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Some of the most pressing unresolved challenges in hepatology today can be related to an imbalance of inflammatory processes: (i) functional or biological cure from hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections can probably not be achieved without an effective antiviral immune response; (ii) the progression from non-alcoholic fatty liver to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with fibrosis is fuelled by chronic hepatic inflammation; (iii) patients with end-stage cirrhosis are prone to life-threatening bacterial infections indicating insufficient antimicrobial responses in the liver; finally, (iv) development and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the result of inadequate tumor clearance and/or suppression of anti-tumor immunity [1]. During the past decades, it has become apparent that hepatic macrophages hold central functions in initiating, perpetuating and even restricting inflammation in the liver. The tremendous progress in understanding their heterogeneity and various functions will be reviewed here and opens new perspectives for the treatment of liver diseases.
Section snippets
The concept of Kupffer cells and infiltrating monocytes in homeostasis and injury response
Macrophages are particularly abundant in the liver. Studies from healthy rodent livers estimated that every 100 hepatocytes are accompanied by 20–40 macrophages [2]. Although these macrophages may look quite similar by histology, they can be a very heterogeneous population with highly specialized functions in the context of liver diseases [3]. One of the fundamental discoveries in the field was the interplay between liver-resident macrophages, termed Kupffer cells, and blood/bone marrow-derived
Beyond M1 and M2: Liver macrophage polarization in the context of injury
Traditionally, macrophage functions have been assigned as inflammatory or “M1” vs. anti-inflammatory or “M2” [33]. This concept is originally based on cell culture experiments, showing that monocyte-derived macrophages can differentiate towards M1 cells by interferon-γ or towards M2 cells by interleukin (IL)-4, which results in typical cytokine response profiles [34]. However, this model is by far too simplistic to describe the polarization of liver macrophages, especially in a disease-context.
Macrophage responses in acute liver injury
Injury to the liver is sensed by Kupffer cells and triggers their activation, followed by the release of inflammatory chemokines and cytokines as well as the recruitment of large numbers of inflammatory monocytes.
Mouse models of acute liver injury have revealed three common steps of macrophage responses in the liver (Fig. 2) [1], [39]: 1. Kupffer cells sense injury and become activated, leading to the release of cytokines and chemokines; 2. the number of macrophages in the liver greatly expands
Hepatic macrophages in viral hepatitis
Few immunocompetent animal models exist for chronic viral hepatitis, which is a major obstacle for studying the role of hepatic macrophages during HBV or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. However, the mouse model of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) causes hepatitis and has revealed interesting insights into macrophage function. Upon LCMV infection in mice, monocytes are massively recruited into the liver within 24 h and outnumber Kupffer cells [40]. Although markers of both types of
Hepatic macrophage contribution to metabolic and alcoholic liver diseases
Experimental mouse models of NASH have clearly demonstrated that the infiltration of Ly-6C+ monocytes is a critical pathogenic event promoting steatohepatitis and subsequently fibrosis progression in NASH [68], [69], [70]. Monocytes are primarily recruited via CCR2-CCL2 interactions in experimental NASH [68], [71]. Possibly, alternative chemokine pathways like CXCR3-CXCL10, CCR1-CCL5 or CCR8-CCL1 can contribute to monocyte recruitment [72], [73], [74]. Hepatic macrophages in progressive NASH
Impact of cholestasis on macrophage functions
Bile acids and bile acid composition have a strong impact on shaping macrophage responses, indicating that macrophage functions are altered in cholestatic liver diseases [88]. Hydrophobic bile acids like chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), which is involved in cholestatic liver injury, leads to NLRP3 inflammasome activation and IL-1β secretion in murine macrophages [89]. This might be an important mechanism of inflammatory macrophage activation in cholestatic liver diseases, especially in
Fibrosis modulation by hepatic macrophages
Hepatic macrophages are central in the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis (Fig. 2) [3], [95]. This concept is impressively underscored by recent reports from two phase II clinical trials that target macrophages in patients with NASH and fibrosis by using either the inhibitor of the serine/threonine kinase ASK1, selonsertib [96], or the dual CCR2/CCR5 inhibitor cenicriviroc [97]. Although both drugs presumably target different actions of macrophages (monocyte recruitment in the case of cenicriviroc
Hepatic macrophages in liver cancer
Dense accumulations of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are regularly observed by immunohistochemical stainings for CD68 or CD14 in resections or explants of patients with HCC [106]. TAM numbers as well as macrophage-related biomarkers correlate with HCC progression and poor survival [107], [108], [109]. Importantly, HCC-associated macrophages typically express PD-L1, also known as CD274 or B7 homolog 1 (B7-H1), by which they suppress antitumoral cytotoxic T cell responses [110], [111].
Macrophage-directed therapeutic approaches to liver diseases
In principle, hepatic macrophages are an attractive target for novel therapeutic approaches to treat liver diseases (Table 2). They are essential pathogenic drivers for inflammation, fibrosis and hepatocarcinogenesis, all of which are key components of progressive chronic liver diseases. Moreover, central pathways leading to their recruitment (chemokines), injury response (e.g. TLRs, inflammasome activation) or their differentiation (polarization programs, effector cytokines) appear well
Conclusions
Monocyte-derived macrophages and Kupffer cells have manifold essential functions in liver diseases, because they promote inflammation, hepatocyte injury, hepatic stellate cell activation, fibrosis, angiogenesis, tumor development, but can also limit disease progression and stimulate resolution.
Intense research over the last decades has revolutionized the view on liver macrophages in the context of health and disease. Liver macrophages consist of ontogenically distinct populations termed Kupffer
Financial support
This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG; Ta434/3-1, Ta434/5-1, and SFB/TRR57) and by the Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF) Aachen.
Conflict of interest
Work in the lab of F.T. has received research funding by Tobira Therapeutics, Galapagos and Noxxon.
References (135)
- et al.
Macrophage heterogeneity in liver injury and fibrosis
J Hepatol
(2014) - et al.
C-Myb(+) erythro-myeloid progenitor-derived fetal monocytes give rise to adult tissue-resident macrophages
Immunity
(2015) - et al.
A reservoir of mature cavity macrophages that can rapidly invade visceral organs to affect tissue repair
Cell
(2016) - et al.
Combination of mass cytometry and imaging analysis reveals origin, location, and functional repopulation of liver myeloid cells in mice
Gastroenterology
(2016) - et al.
CRIg: a macrophage complement receptor required for phagocytosis of circulating pathogens
Cell
(2006) - et al.
CRIg functions as a macrophage pattern recognition receptor to directly bind and capture blood-borne gram-positive bacteria
Cell Host Microbe
(2016) - et al.
Comparison of gene expression profiles between human and mouse monocyte subsets
Blood
(2010) Liver antigen-presenting cells
J Hepatol
(2011)- et al.
Bone marrow-derived and resident liver macrophages display unique transcriptomic signatures but similar biological functions
J Hepatol
(2016) - et al.
Kupffer cell heterogeneity: functional properties of bone marrow derived and sessile hepatic macrophages
Blood
(2007)