Elsevier

Journal of Hepatology

Volume 66, Issue 6, June 2017, Pages 1300-1312
Journal of Hepatology

Review
Targeting hepatic macrophages to treat liver diseases

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2017.02.026Get rights and content

Summary

Our view on liver macrophages in the context of health and disease has been reformed by the recognition of a remarkable heterogeneity of phagocytes in the liver. Liver macrophages consist of ontogenically distinct populations termed Kupffer cells and monocyte-derived macrophages. Kupffer cells are self-renewing, resident and principally non-migratory phagocytes, serving as sentinels for liver homeostasis. Liver injury triggers Kupffer cell activation, leading to inflammatory cytokine and chemokine release. This fosters the infiltration of monocytes into the liver, which give rise to large numbers of inflammatory monocyte-derived macrophages. Liver macrophages are very plastic and adapt their phenotype according to signals derived from the hepatic microenvironment (e.g. danger signals, fatty acids, phagocytosis of cellular debris), which explains their manifold and even opposing functions during disease. These central functions include the perpetuation of inflammation and hepatocyte injury, activation of hepatic stellate cells with subsequent fibrogenesis, and support of tumor development by angiogenesis and T cell suppression. If liver injury ceases, specific molecular signals trigger hepatic macrophages to switch their phenotype towards reparative phagocytes that promote tissue repair and regression of fibrosis. Novel strategies to treat liver disease aim at targeting macrophages. These interventions modulate Kupffer cell activation (e.g. via gut-liver axis or inflammasome formation), monocyte recruitment (e.g. via inhibiting chemokine pathways like CCR2 or CCL2) or macrophage polarization and differentiation (e.g. by nanoparticles). Evidence from mouse models and early clinical studies in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and fibrosis support the notion that pathogenic macrophage subsets can be successfully translated into novel treatment options for patients with liver disease.

Lay summary

Macrophages (Greek for “big eaters”) are a frequent non-parenchymal cell type of the liver that ensures homeostasis, antimicrobial defense and proper metabolism. However, liver macrophages consist of different subtypes regarding their ontogeny (developmental origin), differentiation and function. Understanding this heterogeneity and the critical regulation of inflammation, fibrosis and cancer by macrophage subsets opens promising new options for treating liver diseases.

Introduction

Some of the most pressing unresolved challenges in hepatology today can be related to an imbalance of inflammatory processes: (i) functional or biological cure from hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections can probably not be achieved without an effective antiviral immune response; (ii) the progression from non-alcoholic fatty liver to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with fibrosis is fuelled by chronic hepatic inflammation; (iii) patients with end-stage cirrhosis are prone to life-threatening bacterial infections indicating insufficient antimicrobial responses in the liver; finally, (iv) development and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the result of inadequate tumor clearance and/or suppression of anti-tumor immunity [1]. During the past decades, it has become apparent that hepatic macrophages hold central functions in initiating, perpetuating and even restricting inflammation in the liver. The tremendous progress in understanding their heterogeneity and various functions will be reviewed here and opens new perspectives for the treatment of liver diseases.

Liver macrophages display a remarkable heterogeneity, reflecting their developmental origin (resident Kupffer cells and infiltrating monocytes) and their differentiation (e.g. inflammatory or anti-inflammatory) in response to microenvironmental signals (e.g. danger signals, phagocytosis of cellular debris)

Section snippets

The concept of Kupffer cells and infiltrating monocytes in homeostasis and injury response

Macrophages are particularly abundant in the liver. Studies from healthy rodent livers estimated that every 100 hepatocytes are accompanied by 20–40 macrophages [2]. Although these macrophages may look quite similar by histology, they can be a very heterogeneous population with highly specialized functions in the context of liver diseases [3]. One of the fundamental discoveries in the field was the interplay between liver-resident macrophages, termed Kupffer cells, and blood/bone marrow-derived

Beyond M1 and M2: Liver macrophage polarization in the context of injury

Traditionally, macrophage functions have been assigned as inflammatory or “M1” vs. anti-inflammatory or “M2” [33]. This concept is originally based on cell culture experiments, showing that monocyte-derived macrophages can differentiate towards M1 cells by interferon-γ or towards M2 cells by interleukin (IL)-4, which results in typical cytokine response profiles [34]. However, this model is by far too simplistic to describe the polarization of liver macrophages, especially in a disease-context.

Macrophage responses in acute liver injury

Injury to the liver is sensed by Kupffer cells and triggers their activation, followed by the release of inflammatory chemokines and cytokines as well as the recruitment of large numbers of inflammatory monocytes.

Mouse models of acute liver injury have revealed three common steps of macrophage responses in the liver (Fig. 2) [1], [39]: 1. Kupffer cells sense injury and become activated, leading to the release of cytokines and chemokines; 2. the number of macrophages in the liver greatly expands

Hepatic macrophages in viral hepatitis

Few immunocompetent animal models exist for chronic viral hepatitis, which is a major obstacle for studying the role of hepatic macrophages during HBV or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. However, the mouse model of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) causes hepatitis and has revealed interesting insights into macrophage function. Upon LCMV infection in mice, monocytes are massively recruited into the liver within 24 h and outnumber Kupffer cells [40]. Although markers of both types of

Hepatic macrophage contribution to metabolic and alcoholic liver diseases

Experimental mouse models of NASH have clearly demonstrated that the infiltration of Ly-6C+ monocytes is a critical pathogenic event promoting steatohepatitis and subsequently fibrosis progression in NASH [68], [69], [70]. Monocytes are primarily recruited via CCR2-CCL2 interactions in experimental NASH [68], [71]. Possibly, alternative chemokine pathways like CXCR3-CXCL10, CCR1-CCL5 or CCR8-CCL1 can contribute to monocyte recruitment [72], [73], [74]. Hepatic macrophages in progressive NASH

Impact of cholestasis on macrophage functions

Bile acids and bile acid composition have a strong impact on shaping macrophage responses, indicating that macrophage functions are altered in cholestatic liver diseases [88]. Hydrophobic bile acids like chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), which is involved in cholestatic liver injury, leads to NLRP3 inflammasome activation and IL-1β secretion in murine macrophages [89]. This might be an important mechanism of inflammatory macrophage activation in cholestatic liver diseases, especially in

Fibrosis modulation by hepatic macrophages

Hepatic macrophages are central in the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis (Fig. 2) [3], [95]. This concept is impressively underscored by recent reports from two phase II clinical trials that target macrophages in patients with NASH and fibrosis by using either the inhibitor of the serine/threonine kinase ASK1, selonsertib [96], or the dual CCR2/CCR5 inhibitor cenicriviroc [97]. Although both drugs presumably target different actions of macrophages (monocyte recruitment in the case of cenicriviroc

Hepatic macrophages in liver cancer

Dense accumulations of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are regularly observed by immunohistochemical stainings for CD68 or CD14 in resections or explants of patients with HCC [106]. TAM numbers as well as macrophage-related biomarkers correlate with HCC progression and poor survival [107], [108], [109]. Importantly, HCC-associated macrophages typically express PD-L1, also known as CD274 or B7 homolog 1 (B7-H1), by which they suppress antitumoral cytotoxic T cell responses [110], [111].

Macrophage-directed therapeutic approaches to liver diseases

In principle, hepatic macrophages are an attractive target for novel therapeutic approaches to treat liver diseases (Table 2). They are essential pathogenic drivers for inflammation, fibrosis and hepatocarcinogenesis, all of which are key components of progressive chronic liver diseases. Moreover, central pathways leading to their recruitment (chemokines), injury response (e.g. TLRs, inflammasome activation) or their differentiation (polarization programs, effector cytokines) appear well

Conclusions

Monocyte-derived macrophages and Kupffer cells have manifold essential functions in liver diseases, because they promote inflammation, hepatocyte injury, hepatic stellate cell activation, fibrosis, angiogenesis, tumor development, but can also limit disease progression and stimulate resolution.

Intense research over the last decades has revolutionized the view on liver macrophages in the context of health and disease. Liver macrophages consist of ontogenically distinct populations termed Kupffer

Financial support

This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG; Ta434/3-1, Ta434/5-1, and SFB/TRR57) and by the Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF) Aachen.

Conflict of interest

Work in the lab of F.T. has received research funding by Tobira Therapeutics, Galapagos and Noxxon.

References (135)

  • A. Kelly et al.

    CD141(+) myeloid dendritic cells are enriched in healthy human liver

    J Hepatol

    (2014)
  • Y. Lavin et al.

    Tissue-resident macrophage enhancer landscapes are shaped by the local microenvironment

    Cell

    (2014)
  • J. Xue et al.

    Transcriptome-based network analysis reveals a spectrum model of human macrophage activation

    Immunity

    (2014)
  • P.J. Murray et al.

    Macrophage activation and polarization: nomenclature and experimental guidelines

    Immunity

    (2014)
  • Y. Zhai et al.

    Liver ischemia and reperfusion injury: new insights into mechanisms of innate-adaptive immune-mediated tissue inflammation

    Am J Transplant

    (2011)
  • M. Bourdi et al.

    Protection against acetaminophen-induced liver injury and lethality by interleukin 10: role of inducible nitric oxide synthase

    Hepatology

    (2002)
  • Q. You et al.

    Role of hepatic resident and infiltrating macrophages in liver repair after acute injury

    Biochem Pharmacol

    (2013)
  • A. Boltjes et al.

    The role of Kupffer cells in hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infections

    J Hepatol

    (2014)
  • Z. Tu et al.

    Hepatitis C virus core protein subverts the antiviral activities of human Kupffer cells

    Gastroenterology

    (2010)
  • Y. Tian et al.

    Maternal-derived hepatitis B virus e antigen alters macrophage function in offspring to drive viral persistence after vertical transmission

    Immunity

    (2016)
  • X. Zhang et al.

    CXC chemokine receptor 3 promotes steatohepatitis in mice through mediating inflammatory cytokines, macrophages and autophagy

    J Hepatol

    (2016)
  • A. Jindal et al.

    Fat-laden macrophages modulate lobular inflammation in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)

    Exp Mol Pathol

    (2015)
  • P. Hirsova et al.

    Lipid-induced signaling causes release of inflammatory extracellular vesicles from hepatocytes

    Gastroenterology

    (2016)
  • Y. Kamari et al.

    Lack of interleukin-1alpha or interleukin-1beta inhibits transformation of steatosis to steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis in hypercholesterolemic mice

    J Hepatol

    (2011)
  • L.A. Navarro et al.

    Arginase 2 deficiency results in spontaneous steatohepatitis: a novel link between innate immune activation and hepatic de novo lipogenesis

    J Hepatol

    (2015)
  • Y. Calmus et al.

    Shaping macrophages function and innate immunity by bile acids: mechanisms and implication in cholestatic liver diseases

    Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol

    (2014)
  • V. Keitel et al.

    Expression and function of the bile acid receptor TGR5 in Kupffer cells

    Biochem Biophys Res Commun

    (2008)
  • C. Guo et al.

    Bile acids control inflammation and metabolic disorder through inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome

    Immunity

    (2016)
  • F. Heymann et al.

    Immunology in the liver–from homeostasis to disease

    Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2016)
  • B.G. Lopez et al.

    Characterization of Kupffer cells in livers of developing mice

    Comp Hepatol

    (2011)
  • K.W. von Kupffer

    Über Sternzellen der Leber

    Arch Mikroskop Anat

    (1876)
  • E. Gomez Perdiguero et al.

    Tissue-resident macrophages originate from yolk-sac-derived erythro-myeloid progenitors

    Nature

    (2015)
  • E. Mass et al.

    Specification of tissue-resident macrophages during organogenesis

    Science

    (2016)
  • C. Varol et al.

    Macrophages: development and tissue specialization

    Ann Rev Immunol

    (2015)
  • D. Dal-Secco et al.

    A dynamic spectrum of monocytes arising from the in situ reprogramming of CCR2+ monocytes at a site of sterile injury

    J Exp Med

    (2015)
  • F. Heymann et al.

    Liver inflammation abrogates immunological tolerance induced by Kupffer cells

    Hepatology

    (2015)
  • B.G. Surewaard et al.

    Identification and treatment of the Staphylococcus aureus reservoir in vivo

    J Exp Med

    (2016)
  • P. Strnad et al.

    Liver – guardian, modifier and target of sepsis

    Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2017)
  • J.C. Mossanen et al.

    Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 2-positive monocytes aggravate the early phase of acetaminophen-induced acute liver injury

    Hepatology

    (2016)
  • C. Auffray et al.

    Monitoring of blood vessels and tissues by a population of monocytes with patrolling behavior

    Science

    (2007)
  • N.V. Serbina et al.

    Monocyte emigration from bone marrow during bacterial infection requires signals mediated by chemokine receptor CCR2

    Nat Immunol

    (2006)
  • F.K. Swirski et al.

    Identification of splenic reservoir monocytes and their deployment to inflammatory sites

    Science

    (2009)
  • K.R. Karlmark et al.

    Hepatic recruitment of the inflammatory Gr1+ monocyte subset upon liver injury promotes hepatic fibrosis

    Hepatology

    (2009)
  • I. Theurl et al.

    On-demand erythrocyte disposal and iron recycling requires transient macrophages in the liver

    Nat Med

    (2016)
  • T.L. Murphy et al.

    Transcriptional control of dendritic cell development

    Ann Rev Immunol

    (2016)
  • C.L. Scott et al.

    Bone marrow-derived monocytes give rise to self-renewing and fully differentiated Kupffer cells

    Nat Commun

    (2016)
  • P. Ramachandran et al.

    Differential Ly-6C expression identifies the recruited macrophage phenotype, which orchestrates the regression of murine liver fibrosis

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2012)
  • E. Liaskou et al.

    Monocyte subsets in human liver disease show distinct phenotypic and functional characteristics

    Hepatology

    (2013)
  • H.W. Zimmermann et al.

    Functional contribution of elevated circulating and hepatic non-classical CD14CD16 monocytes to inflammation and human liver fibrosis

    PLoS One

    (2010)
  • P.J. Murray

    Macrophage polarization

    Ann Rev Physiol

    (2017)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text