Short communicationIn search of a new balance. Can high “action-proneness” in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome be changed by a multidisciplinary group treatment?
Introduction
Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a distressing and potentially disabling illness characterized by persistent medically unexplained fatigue, muscular and articular pains, postexertional malaise, and other nonspecific symptoms [1]. A clear cause of the condition is not established, although the pathophysiology of CFS (and the largely overlapping fibromyalgia syndrome) may be based on subtle stress system malfunctions [2].
Many authors believe that since a direct curative treatment for CFS is not available, recovery may be facilitated when patients realistically adapt to their current limitations, at the same time, trying to progressively increase their physical and mental effort tolerance [2]. In a systematic review, both cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) and graded exercise therapy (GET) have been considered evidence-based methods to obtain these goals [3].
In our previous research, we investigated the possible etiopathogenetic role of an “overactive” lifestyle in CFS, which we operationalized as high “action-proneness,” that is, a cognitive and behavioral tendency toward direct action [4]. Maladaptive overactivity patterns may not only precede the illness but may persist after illness onset (e.g., periodic outbursts of activity followed by prolonged periods of rest), constituting an important perpetuating factor [5].
The aim of the present study was to investigate whether, and to which degree, adaptive changes in beliefs, attitudes, and intentions concerning (over)activity occur in CFS patients participating in a multidisciplinary CBT- and GET-based treatment program. The study was part of a larger outcome study, the results of which are reported elsewhere [6].
Section snippets
Participants
Sixty-two consecutively admitted patients (55 female and 7 male, mean age=39.03 years, S.D.=8.61) participated in the study. The majority (87%) had at least higher secondary education, and 80% were married or living together. Only two patients dropped out before the end of the treatment.
Each patient was sent to our CFS Reference Centre at the University Hospitals Leuven by his/her general practitioner. At the end of the multidisciplinary diagnostic screening, a CFS diagnosis was based on the
Results
As shown in Table 1, Table 2, the patients' pretreatment action-proneness levels (M=17.75, S.D.=6.21) were significantly lower than premorbid levels (M=38.27, S.D.=6.65, P<.001). On the other hand, posttreatment action-proneness levels (M=20.23, S.D.=4.65) were significantly higher than pretreatment levels (P=.03) but still significantly lower than premorbid levels (P<.001).
The SOs scored the patients' pretreatment action-proneness also as lower (M=19.95, S.D.=6.97) than the patients' premorbid
Discussion
First, the results of this study are in line with our previous findings that CFS patients describe themselves, before illness onset, as highly “action-prone” [4]. Moreover, as in our former research [5], patients' self-descriptions were paralleled by the opinion of their SOs.
Second, after illness onset, patients' reported action-proneness levels strongly decreased—an expected finding that could be considered a consequence of symptoms and illness-related functional limitations.
Third, when at the
Acknowledgment
The authors thank the team members of the CFS Reference Centre of the University Hospitals Leuven for their help in the collection of data.
References (10)
- et al.
Does high ‘action proneness’ make people more vulnerable to chronic fatigue syndrome? A controlled psychometric study
J Psychosom Res
(1995) - et al.
Premorbid ‘overactive’ lifestyle in chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. An etiological factor or proof of good citizenship?
J Psychosom Res
(2001) - et al.
The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study
Ann Intern Med
(1994) - et al.
Fibromyalgia: a stress disorder? Piecing the biopsychosocial puzzle together
Psychother Psychosom
(2004) - et al.
Interventions for the treatment and management of chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review
JAMA
(2002)
Cited by (31)
Affective spectrum symptoms and self-criticism: A behavioral genetic approach
2018, Journal of Psychosomatic ResearchCitation Excerpt :Self-criticism is increasingly conceptualized as a transdiagnostic factor that may play a key role in explaining the high comorbidity between depressive symptoms and FSS [36,37]. Specifically, self-criticism has been shown to be associated with a pattern of over-activity and persistence [38–41], which may lead to a crash of the stress system, typical of both depression [42–45] and functional somatic disorders [38,46–49], because of the ‘wear and tear’ caused by chronic stress and over-activity. In this regard it is also important to consider that self-criticism and both depressive symptoms and FSS share important environmental factors, such as early childhood adversity [50–53] and dysfunctional (e.g., cold and controlling) parenting [54–56].
Coping with fibromyalgia using cognitive-behavioral therapy: Clinical case study "mrs L."
2013, Journal de Therapie Comportementale et CognitiveThe prevalence and impact of early childhood trauma in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
2013, Journal of Psychiatric ResearchCitation Excerpt :Early childhood trauma may also have important effects on personality and lifestyle. For instance, we and others have hypothesized that high levels of “action-proneness” and self-critical perfectionism that have been identified in at least a subgroup of CFS patients (Kempke et al., 2011b, in press; Van Houdenhove, Bruyninckx, and Luyten, 2006), may reflect attempts to compensate for feelings of worthlessness and inferiority associated with (emotional) adverse childhood experiences in order to regain a positive sense of self (Kempke et al., 2011a; Van Houdenhove, 1986, 2005; Van Houdenhove and Neerinckx, 1999; Van Houdenhove et al., 2001; Van Houdenhove, Stans, and Verstraeten, 1987). Although this study has a number of strengths, including the diary method approach, several limitations need to be considered.
The role of acceptance in chronic fatigue syndrome
2011, Journal of Psychosomatic ResearchCitation Excerpt :Systematic reviews have shown CBT to be effective in improving functioning and reducing fatigue in CFS patients [5]. CBT, along with Graded Exercise Therapy, has also been shown in a non randomised trial to significantly improve “action-proneness” (cognitive and behavioural tendency towards direct action), although not to pre-morbid levels [6]. Research on patients with chronic pain has suggested that attempting to control pain which is uncontrollable (lack of acceptance) is associated with distress and frustration [7,8], reduced physical functioning [9], higher pain identity and more serious perceived consequences [10].
Predictors of outcome in a multi-component treatment program for chronic fatigue syndrome
2010, Journal of Affective Disorders