Differential and distributed effects of dopamine neuromodulations on resting-state network connectivity
Introduction
Dopaminergic regulation of neural processing is critical for core functions of cognition, motivated behaviour and reward response, as established by decades of animal research (Brozoski et al., 1979, Nieoullon, 2002, Schultz, 2002, Wise, 2004). Dopamine neurotransmission is also linked with impulsivity and reward-seeking behaviours in humans (Buckholtz et al., 2010, Cole et al., 2012b, Pessiglione et al., 2006). There is, therefore, considerable appreciation of the potential for dopaminergic neuromodulatory interventions to treat cognitive symptoms across a range of neuropsychiatric disorders (Cools, 2006, Goldberg et al., 1993, Robbins, 2000, Volkow et al., 2004), or even in experimental enhancement of ‘normal’ cognitive abilities (Cools and D'Esposito, 2011, Robbins, 2000, Volkow et al., 2009). However, the efficacy of dopamine-targeting therapies has proven extremely variable, depending on the disease or cognitive/behavioural process in question (Cools, 2006, Crow, 1980, Davis et al., 1991, Heidbreder and Newman, 2010, Laruelle et al., 2003, Martinez et al., 2011). In particular, the use of drugs to ‘correct’ hypo- or hyper-dopaminergic states in associated neuropsychiatric disorders is thought to potentiate certain sensory-motor and cognitive side effects or comorbid presentations (Cools, 2006, Dagher and Robbins, 2009, Goldberg et al., 1993).
Importantly, recent insights into understanding how brain dopamine regulates higher-level psychological functions (e.g., cognitive control and working memory) emphasise a key role for differences in baseline molecular levels in determining performance variability, both across populations and within individual subjects. In particular, it is increasingly apparent that simple ‘linear’ relationships, although extant in the brain (Diaconescu et al., 2010, Oei et al., 2012, Pessiglione et al., 2006), do not describe fully the complex association between dopamine levels and cognitive abilities (Cools and D'Esposito, 2011). A common observation is that both hypo- and hyper-dopaminergic states can have deleterious effects on cognitive performance, indicative of an ‘inverted U-shaped’ (i.e., nonlinear) association between dopamine neuromodulation and psychological functioning (Cools and D'Esposito, 2011). This could imply the existence of an ‘optimum’ molecular dopamine level required to balance the interplay between competing psychological processes and thus promote function. However, somewhat paradoxically this optimum level may vary, not just across different individuals and dopamine-dependent behaviours, but also across different functionally implicated brain regions (Cools and D'Esposito, 2011). This unpredictability of dopamine's ability to improve one faculty while diminishing another has significant ramifications for the psychopharmacological management of multiple neuropsychiatric disorders, including addiction, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia.
Inverted U-shaped associations between dopamine and cognition are typically reported during the performance of prescribed cognitive tasks that activate discrete brain regions (Cools and D'Esposito, 2011). However, early evidence indicates that the ‘systems-level’ corollaries of dopaminergic neuronal signalling can also be probed at the level of large-scale temporal interactions, or “functional connectivity”, within several cortico-subcortical and cortico-cortical cognitive control networks; including outside of specific task scenarios, when the brain is in a psychological “resting state” (Achard and Bullmore, 2007, Cole et al., 2012a, Kelly et al., 2009). Indeed, a growing body of functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) literature emphasises fundamental, predictive associations between brain activity and connectivity patterns evoked during cognitive tasks and these spontaneously emerging ‘resting state networks’ (RSNs) (Fox et al., 2007, Pyka et al., 2009, Sala-Llonch et al., 2012, Smith et al., 2009). Furthermore, the translational value of resting-state brain activity measurements for addressing clinically relevant questions of diagnostics and prognostics is becoming increasingly apparent (Castellanos et al., 2008, Cole et al., 2010, Filippini et al., 2009, Fox and Greicius, 2010, Greicius et al., 2004, Murphy and Mackay, 2011).
Indications for nonlinear effects of dopamine neuromodulation on functional connectivity do exist in the task-based FMRI literature (Cohen et al., 2007, Wallace et al., 2011). Findings, however, appear contradictory, precluding unequivocal conclusions regarding their functional significance. We previously identified opposing (i.e., linear) systems-level effects of promoting and blocking dopamine neurotransmission, with dopamine precursor (levodopa; l-DOPA) and selective antagonist (haloperidol) pharmacological challenges respectively increasing and decreasing RSN cortico-subcortical functional connectivity (Cole et al., 2012b). Together with reported linear dopaminergic effects on reward processing and activity in equivalent neurocircuitry (Diaconescu et al., 2010, Oei et al., 2012, Pessiglione et al., 2006), such roles for the dopamine neurotransmitter system in modulating spontaneous large-scale neuronal interactions appear biologically plausible. Nonetheless, prior investigations may have overlooked more widespread effects (both linear and nonlinear) of dopamine modulation on network connectivity, particularly within higher-level neocortical circuitry. The human brain systems influenced by dopamine neurotransmission are anatomically distributed in nature throughout the cortex and subcortex and the precise mechanisms of functional integration across the regions involved in dopamine-dependent processing are not clear (Koob and Volkow, 2010, Wise, 2004; although see Cole et al., 2012a). With these caveats and the cumulative evidence from task-based neuroimaging studies in mind (Cools and D'Esposito, 2011), we reasoned that nonlinear dopaminergic drug effects might also be detectable in resting-state neural signalling patterns. We therefore examined, in data from three groups of healthy subjects reported on previously (Cole et al., 2012b), effects of broad-spectrum (agonistic and antagonistic) dopamine manipulation on the functional connectivity patterns of distinct large-scale networks, using a new analytical approach adapted to examine both linear and nonlinear systems-level connectivity relationships across the whole brain. Our hypotheses focussed on the ‘default mode’ network (DMN) and other RSNs containing reward circuitry shown to support higher-level cognitive and motivational functions (see Methods section).
Section snippets
Participants and study design
We recruited 55 healthy male volunteers, naïve to the experimental drugs, who were assigned randomly to three groups (l-DOPA, haloperidol or placebo). Data are reported from 49 participants who completed the study in full (mean age = 22.4 years ± 4.1 s.d.; see Table 1). Eligibility criteria were: no current (or history of) psychiatric problems as determined by the Mini-international Neuropsychiatric Interview (Sheehan et al., 1998); no medical history indicating a risk using l-DOPA or haloperidol
Dopamine modulates distinct network connectivity patterns differentially
We found significant effects, both linear and nonlinear, of dopaminergic agonistic and antagonistic drug modulations on the functional connectivity patterns of two distinct, behaviourally relevant resting-state networks identified by group-ICA. A predominantly subcortical ‘basal ganglia/limbic’ network (BGLN; Fig. 1A), which covered the majority of the bilateral striatum and portions of the pallidum and amygdala, showed a significant linear effect of dopamine drug group (cluster t > 2.3, p < 0.05,
Discussion
Dopaminergic psychopharmacological medications, used to treat neurochemical pathology and associated symptoms in multiple neuropsychiatric disorders, are often of mixed efficacy and regularly associated with adverse cognitive and sensory-motor side effects (Cools, 2006, Dagher and Robbins, 2009, Davis et al., 1991, Goldberg et al., 1993, Martinez et al., 2011). It has been posited that the apparent lack of ability to predict ‘what will work for whom’ with dopamine-targeting drugs is due to a
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Roelof Soeter and Olga Teutler for assistance with data acquisition and Dr. Natalie Voets for helpful discussion regarding the manuscript content. This work was supported by an IDEA League Student Research Award of Imperial College London (2011, to DMC) and a Grant of The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) (Grant No. 91786368, to SARBR). Further support was provided by a doctoral CASE studentship of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and the UK Biotechnology and
References (74)
- et al.
Functional-anatomic fractionation of the brain's default network
Neuron
(2010) - et al.
Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2000) - et al.
Cingulate–precuneus interactions: a new locus of dysfunction in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Biol. Psychiatry
(2008) - et al.
Defining functional areas in individual human brains using resting functional connectivity MRI
NeuroImage
(2008) - et al.
Nicotine replacement in abstinent smokers improves cognitive withdrawal symptoms with modulation of resting brain network dynamics
NeuroImage
(2010) Dopaminergic modulation of cognitive function — implications for l-DOPA treatment in Parkinson's disease
Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.
(2006)- et al.
Inverted-U-shaped dopamine actions on human working memory and cognitive control
Biol. Psychiatry
(2011) - et al.
Personality, addiction, dopamine: insights from Parkinson's disease
Neuron
(2009) - et al.
Dopamine-induced changes in neural network patterns supporting aversive conditioning
Brain Res.
(2010) - et al.
Noradrenaline synthesis from l-DOPA in rodents and its relationship to motor activity
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
(1976)
Intrinsic fluctuations within cortical systems account for intertrial variability in human behavior
Neuron
Default-mode and task-positive network activity in major depressive disorder: implications for adaptive and maladaptive rumination
Biol. Psychiatry
Competition between functional brain networks mediates behavioral variability
NeuroImage
Non-invasive imaging in experimental medicine for drug development
Curr. Opin. Pharmacol.
Inter-individual differences in resting-state functional connectivity predict task-induced BOLD activity
NeuroImage
Dopamine and the regulation of cognition and attention
Prog. Neurobiol.
Brain connectivity during resting state and subsequent working memory task predicts behavioural performance
Cortex
Getting formal with dopamine and reward
Neuron
Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL
NeuroImage
Network modelling methods for fMRI
NeuroImage
Reliable intrinsic connectivity networks: test–retest evaluation using ICA and dual regression approach
NeuroImage
Efficiency and cost of economical brain functional networks
PLoS Comput. Biol.
Beyond feeling: chronic pain hurts the brain, disrupting the default-mode network dynamics
J. Neurosci.
Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging
IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging
Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.
Conflict monitoring and decision making: reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function
Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci.
Cognitive deficit caused by regional depletion of dopamine in prefrontal cortex of rhesus monkey
Science
Dopaminergic network differences in human impulsivity
Science
The brain's default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
Dopamine modulates episodic memory persistence in old age
J. Neurosci.
Dopamine gene predicts the brain's response to dopaminergic drug
Eur. J. Neurosci.
Orbitofrontal connectivity with resting-state networks is associated with midbrain dopamine D3 receptor availability
Cereb. Cortex
Dopamine-dependent architecture of cortico-subcortical network connectivity
Cereb. Cortex
Impulsive personality predicts dopamine-dependent changes in frontostriatal activity during component processes of working memory
J. Neurosci.
Molecular pathology of schizophrenia: more than one disease process?
Br. Med. J.
Nucleus accumbens D2/3 receptors predict trait impulsivity and cocaine reinforcement
Science
Dopamine in schizophrenia: a review and reconceptualization
Am. J. Psychiatry
Cited by (101)
Fronto-striatal dynamic connectivity is linked to dopaminergic motor response in Parkinson's disease
2023, Parkinsonism and Related DisordersSocial and non-social working memory in neurodegeneration
2023, Neurobiology of DiseaseCircuit-Based Approaches to Understanding Corticostriatothalamic Dysfunction Across the Psychosis Continuum
2023, Biological PsychiatryCitation Excerpt :One critical consideration is that the precise relationship between DA levels and interregional functional or effective connectivity is unclear. While several studies have examined how pharmacological manipulation of DA levels influences regional activity and FC (187,188), links with psychosis are complicated because the manipulations themselves may not accurately mimic the underlying DA disruption in psychosis. The link between DA and fMRI signals is complex, and the influence of DA on brain function may not be sufficiently captured by FC analyses (187,188).
Brain network characteristics and cognitive performance in motor subtypes of Parkinson's disease: A resting state fMRI study
2022, Parkinsonism and Related Disorders