The impact of illustrations on public understanding of the aim of cancer screening

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2006.03.016Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To study the effectiveness of visual illustrations in improving people's understanding of the preventive aim of flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening.

Methods

Three-hundred and eighteen people aged 60–64 were offered an appointment to attend FS screening and randomly allocated to receive either written information alone or written information plus illustrations. The illustrations showed the adenoma–carcinoma sequence and how it can be interrupted by removing polyps found during FS. Telephone interviews were conducted with a randomly selected sub-set of people prior to their screening appointment to assess their knowledge and understanding of the test (n = 65). The interviews were tape-recorded, transcribed and content analysed by researchers blind to the condition people had been allocated to.

Results

In the written information only group, 57% understood that the test was looking for polyps rather than just cancer, whilst in the group who received written information and illustrations, 84% understood this. Logistic regression analyses confirmed that addition of illustrations resulted in significantly better understanding (OR = 3.75; CI: 1.16–12.09; p = 0.027), and this remained significant controlling for age, gender and Townsend scores (an area-based measure of deprivation) (OR = 10.85; CI: 1.72–68.43; p = 0.01).

Conclusion

Illustrations improved understanding of the preventive aim of FS screening.

Practice implications

Pictoral illustrations could be used to facilitate patient understanding of screening.

Introduction

Informed decision-making about cancer screening requires people to understand its potential costs and benefits. Recent evidence indicates that the public overestimate the benefits of screening and are largely unaware of its short-comings or potential for adverse effects [1], [2]. As a result, efforts to promote informed decision-making have concentrated on providing information to clarify the limitations of screening [3], [4]. However, there are positive aspects of screening that need to be conveyed; one of which is that some types of cancer screening (e.g. cervical screening) do more than identify cancer early; they can actually prevent it by detecting and removing pre-cancerous lesions.

The limited evidence available indicates that the concept of a pre-cancerous lesion is poorly understood. Knowledge of pre-cancerous states for oral and cervical cancers is poor [5], [6], [7], and the terms ‘pre-cancer’ and ‘cancer’ are often assumed to be synonymous. Although cervical screening is well-established in Britain, a survey of first time attenders at a colposcopy clinic for the treatment of cervical abnormalities found that 10% of women thought an abnormal smear meant early-stage cancer [7].

Like cervical screening, flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening has the potential to prevent cancer by detecting and removing the pre-cancerous lesions (adenomatous polyps), and thereby interrupting the ademoma–carcinoma sequence [8]. Few people are likely to be aware that colorectal cancer can be prevented through screening because knowledge of this type of cancer is poor [9], [10]. This is important in the UK, because colorectal cancer screening will be offered as part of the nationwide screening program from 2006, and effective ways of informing all sectors of the community about screening need to be developed.

Written leaflets are often used to convey the benefits and harms of screening, but they have limitations. People may not be attracted to written materials, some will find the content difficult to understand either because of the use of technical language in the document or their own literacy level, and the material may be hard to remember. Surprisingly, simplifying written information has been found to be more beneficial to good readers than poor readers [11]. One possible alternative approach is to use illustrations to supplement the text. Research into the value of illustrations in enhancing health communications has been scant, but a recent review [12] concluded that visual displays of information alongside text can make a useful contribution. Illustrations make written information more attractive [13], [14], and increase the likelihood that the text will be read [15], understood [14] and remembered [15], [16]. Illustrations may be particularly beneficial for people with low levels of literacy who are both least knowledgeable about cancer [17] and least likely to benefit from written information. There is also evidence that illustrations improve comprehension more among people with lower literacy or fewer years of education [14], [18].

We hypothesized that visual illustrations of the development of adenomas and their removal during FS screening would clarify written information and help people understand that FS is intended to prevent colorectal cancer. The present study compared people's understanding of the preventive aim of FS screening following written material alone or written material accompanied with illustrations.

Section snippets

Participants and procedures

Three-hundred and eighteen people, aged 60–64, registered at GP practices in Harrow (London, UK), and eligible for screening (e.g. had not had an endoscopic bowel investigation in the last 2 years) were invited to participate in an ongoing feasibility study into population-based FS screening, and were sent a timed, dated screening appointment. They were randomized either to be sent a written leaflet alone (n = 151) or a written leaflet along with a set of illustrations showing the development of

Results

Of the 123 people who had been randomly selected for interview, 25 could not be contacted after several attempts, 16 telephone numbers were incorrect and we were unable to obtain a correct number, two respondents had communication difficulties (one because of poor English and one because of Parkinson's disease), four were on holiday during the interview period, and three of the interviews were terminated prematurely because of external interruptions. Only eight people declined to be

Discussion

Our results show that simple visual information is effective in increasing people's understanding of the preventive aim of colorectal cancer screening using flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS). People who were sent the illustrations were significantly more likely to understand that the aim of FS screening was to detect polyps and prevent cancer rather than just to detect cancer. There was no evidence of enhanced recall of information provided in the text that accompanied the illustrations such as the

References (26)

  • A.M. Kavanagh et al.

    Women's understanding of abnormal cervical smear test results: a qualitative interview study

    Br Med J

    (1997)
  • B.A. Onyeka et al.

    Information leaflets, verbal information and women's knowledge of abnormal cervical smears and colposcopy

    J Obstet Gynaecol

    (2003)
  • R.L. Nelson et al.

    Determination of factors responsible for the declining incidence of colorectal cancer

    Dis Colon Rectum

    (1999)
  • Cited by (53)

    • Using pictures to convey health information: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects on patient and consumer health behaviors and outcomes

      2020, Patient Education and Counseling
      Citation Excerpt :

      The pooled effect estimate of the eight studies that reported continuous outcomes indicates that pictorial interventions significantly increased participant recall at a small effect size (SMD = 0.31; 95% CI 0.07, 0.54), however, there was substantial heterogeneity (chi2 = 18.98; df = 7; p < 0.008; I2 = 63%) (see supplemental figure 4a) [48,66,67,72,89,90,99,110]. The four studies that presented recall as a dichotomous outcome did not show a statistical significance (OR = 5.53; 95% CI 0.52, 58.96) and there was significant heterogeneity (chi2 = 56.47; df = 3; p < 0.00001; I2 = 95%) (see supplemental figure 4b) [68,83,84,112]. A total of 11 studies assessed the effect of pictorial interventions on adherence (this includes adherence to medication, medication refills, insulin treatment, or an exercise program) in comparison to a control group.

    • Pictures in health information and their pitfalls: Focus group study and systematic review

      2018, Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen
      Citation Excerpt :

      In six trials, it was unclear whether or not the participants knew about the allocated intervention [25–30]. The processes of generating allocation sequences and concealing allocation were not sufficiently described in most of the studies [22–25,27–32]. In addition, baseline outcome measurements were not adequately assessed or reported [22–34].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text