Molecular Basis of Esophageal Cancer Development and Progression

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2012.07.002Get rights and content

Introduction

This article is divided into 2 separate, but parallel, sections regarding the molecular mechanisms underlying the development and progression of esophageal neoplasms. Adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas are known to have differing risk factors and characteristic demographic factors, suggesting that the molecular events that lead to each of these cancers are distinct. In addition, our developing understanding of the molecular biology of these diseases confirms this assumption. Therefore, the first section of the article describes the current understanding of molecular events leading to esophageal adenocarcinomas and the second section relates to the development of esophageal squamous cell carcinomas.

Section snippets

Epidemiology

The overall epidemiology of esophageal cancers is more thoroughly described elsewhere in this issue by Reed and colleagues. The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma has increased by 400% over the past decade, which is greater than any other malignancy in the same period. This phenomenon has been observed primarily in Western nations, whereas squamous cell cancers remain the predominant histology in most of Asia and other nations.

The most notable risk factors for adenocarcinoma are

Summary

The most clinically relevant molecular targets in esophageal cancer are those targets previously identified in other more common types of carcinomas, and the importance of these proteins in esophageal cancer was later established. Previous clinical studies of targeted agents in the treatment of other cancers has established clinical safety profiles, which has facilitated the adoption of agents such as inhibitors of EFGR, Her2/neu, and VEGF for the treatment of esophageal cancer. Ongoing

Squamous cell carcinoma

Worldwide, squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus is more common than adenocarcinoma. In America, squamous cell cancers comprise only 20% of all esophageal cancers, and this incidence is declining. Smoking and alcohol consumption are considered the major risk factors for the development of squamous cell cancers, and the molecular pathways leading from these environmental exposures to carcinogenesis are still being established. Both alcohol and smoking are known to have numerous carcinogenic

Summary

Our understanding of the molecular events responsible for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma continues to evolve. As further knowledge is gained, more options for targeted molecular therapy are anticipated. Currently, targeted agents in clinical trials are those agents previously investigated for the treatment of other diseases that are more prevalent in America. Early results from several nonrandomized trials that include these agents are encouraging, but

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (51)

  • C. Pinto et al.

    Phase II study of cetuximab in combination with FOLFIRI in patients with untreated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma

    Ann Oncol

    (2007)
  • H. Safran et al.

    Phase I/II study of trastuzumab, paclitaxel, cisplatin and radiation for locally advanced, HER2 overexpressing, esophageal adenocarcinoma

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2007)
  • T.P. Brien et al.

    Her-2/neu gene amplification by FISH predicts poor survival in Barrett’s esophagus-associated adenocarcinoma

    Hum Pathol

    (2000)
  • Y.J. Bang et al.

    Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (toGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomized controlled trial

    Lancet

    (2010)
  • M. Shimizu et al.

    Immunohistochemical localization of ethanol-induced P450IIE1 in the rat alimentary tract

    Gastroenterology

    (1990)
  • S.W. Choi et al.

    Chronic alcohol consumption induces genomic but not p53-specific DNA hypomethylation in rat colon

    J Nutr

    (1999)
  • S. Oberg et al.

    Determinates of intestinal metaplasia within the columnar lined esophagus

    Arch Surg

    (2000)
  • K. Dvorak et al.

    Molecular mechanisms of Barrett’s esophagus and adenocarcinoma

    Ann N Y Acad Sci

    (2011)
  • E.M. Braunstein et al.

    Villin: a marker for development of the epithelial pyloric border

    Dev Dyn

    (2002)
  • Y. Hu et al.

    The pathogenesis of Barrett’s esophagus: secondary bile acids upregulates intestinal differentiation factor CDX2 expression in esophageal cells

    J Gastrointest Surg

    (2007)
  • B.S. Kaur et al.

    Acid and bile-induced PGE(2) release and hyperproliferation in Barrett’s esophagus are COX-2 and PKC-epsilon dependent

    Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol

    (2002)
  • R.A. LeBoeuf et al.

    The induction of transformed-like morphology and enhanced growth in Syrian hamster embryo cells grown at acid pH

    Carcinogenesis

    (1986)
  • K. Jaiswal et al.

    Bile salt exposure increases proliferation through p38 and ERK MAPK pathways in a non-neoplastic Barrett’s cell line

    Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol

    (2006)
  • A. Goldman et al.

    A novel mechanism of acid and bile acid-induced DNA damage involving Na+/H+ exchanger: implication for Barrett’s oesophagus

    Gut

    (2010)
  • L. Hutchinson et al.

    Human Barrett’s adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, associated myofibroblasts, and endothelium can arise from bone marrow-derived cells after allogeneic stem cell transplant

    Stem Cells Dev

    (2011)
  • Cited by (33)

    • Protein coding gene CRNKL1 as a potential prognostic biomarker in esophageal adenocarcinoma

      2017, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      A biological marker can afford an indication of the disease condition, whether normal or abnormal, which should be sensitive, specific and cost-effective. In current clinical practice, PTGS2, EGFR, ERBB2 and TP53 were considered as the optimal prognostic EAC biomarkers [7–11]. COX-2, an induced enzyme, is encoded by the PTGS2 gene, and its expression affects survival outcomes of patients in EAC [12,13].

    • FOXQ1 promotes esophageal cancer proliferation and metastasis by negatively modulating CDH1

      2015, Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Due to difficulties in early diagnosis and poor efficacy of treatment of ESCC, the 5-year survival rate remains dismal [2], despite improvements having been made in treatments such as surgical resection and adjuvant chemoradiation. Epidemiological studies have suggested tobacco, alcohol, nitrosamines, physical injury and chronic inflammation as major risk factors in ESCC [3–6]. Previous studies manifested that tumor suppressor p53 and Rb frequently altered, including mutation of p53, loss of heterozygosity of Rb [4,7].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text