Skip to main content
Log in

Dietary Restrictions During Ambulatory Monitoring of Duodenogastroesophageal Reflux

  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To avoid food impaction artifacts during ambulatory bile reflux monitoring (Bilitec), some groups have allowed only a liquid diet, while others omitted the meal and postprandial periods from the analysis. Our aim was to study whether Bilitec monitoring requires the use of a liquid diet. In 40 healthy subjects and 211 consecutive patients evaluated for suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease, we performed ambulatory 24-hr esophageal pH and Bilitec monitoring. The subjects were randomized to either solid or liquid meals during the procedure. All patients underwent an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. In healthy subjects, liquid and solid diets were followed by similar acid exposure of the distal esophagus. During bile reflux monitoring, major meal artifacts occurred in 19% of the patients using solid meals, but in none of the patients using liquid meals. With liquid meals, but not with solid meals, a progressive increase in duodenoesophageal reflux occurred with increasing severity of endoscopic lesions. With liquid meals, but not with solid meals, the prevalence of pathological exposure to duodenoesophageal reflux increased with increasing severity of endoscopic lesions. With liquid meals, the results of pH monitoring and bile reflux monitoring correlated better than with solid meals. Thus, ambulatory Bilitec monitoring requires the use of liquid meals, as the use of solid meals is associated with too many meal artifacts and a poorer correlation with acid reflux and severity of endoscopic lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnsson F, Joelsson B, Floren CH, Nillson A: Bile salts in the esophagus of patients with esophagitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 23:712-716, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gotley DC, Morgan AP, Ball D, Owen RW, Cooper MJ: Bile acid concentrations in the refluxate of patients with reflux oesophagitis. Br J Surg 75:587-590, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  3. Drane WE, Karvelis K, Johnson DA, Curranx JJ, Silverman ED: Scintigraphic evaluation of duodenogastric reflux. Problems, pitfalls, and technical review. Clin Nucl Med 12:377-384, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  4. Attwood SEA, De Meester TR, Bremner CG, Barlow AP, Hinder RD: Alkaline gastroesophageal reflux; implications in the development of complications in Barrett's columnar-lined lower esophagus. Surgery 106:764-776, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  5. Iftikhar SY, Ledingham S, Evans D, Yusuf SW, Steele RI, Atkinson M, Hardcastle SP: Alkaline gastro-esophageal reflux: dual pH probe monitoring. Gut 37:465-470, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  6. Singh S, Bradley LA, Richter JE: Determinants of oesophageal alkaline pH environment in controls and patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gut 34:309-316, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  7. Devault KR, Georgeson S, Castell DO: Salivary stimulation mimics esophageal exposure to refluxed duodenal contents. Am J Gastroenterol 88:1040-1043, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bechi P, Paucciani F, Baldini F, Cosi F, Falciai R, Mazzanti R, Castagnoli A, Passeri D, Boscherini S: Long-term ambulatory enterogastric reflux monitoring. Validation of a new fiberoptic technique. Dig Dis Sci 38:1297-1306, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vaezi MF, Lacamera RG, and Richter JE: Validation studies of Bilitec 2000: an ambulatory duodenogastric reflux monitoring system. Am J Physiol 267:G1050-G1057, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  10. Caldwell MT, Byrne PJ, Brazil N, Crowley V, Attwood SE, Walsh TN, Hennesy TP: An ambulatory bile reflux monitoring system: an in vitro appraisal. Physiol Meas 15:57-65, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stipa F, Stein HJ, Feussner H, Kraemer S, Stewert JR: Assessment of non-acid esophageal reflux: comparison between long-term reflux aspiration test and fiberoptic bilirubin monitoring. Dis Esophagus 10:24-28, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  12. Champion G, Richter JE, Vaezi MF, Singh S, Alexander R: Duodenogastroesophageal reflux: relationship to pH and importance in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 107:747-754, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  13. Caldwell MT, Lawlor P, Byrne PJ, Walsh TN, Hennessy TP: Ambulatory esophageal bile reflux monitoring in Barrett's esophagus. Br J Surg 82:425-426, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kauer WK, Peters JH, De Meester TR, Ireland AP, Bremner CE, Hagen JA: Mixed reflux of gastric and duodenal juices is more harmful to the esophagus than gastric juice alone. The need for surgical therapy re-emphasized. Ann Surg 222:135-136, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vaezi MF, Richter JE: Role of acid and duodenogastrooesophageal reflux in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 111:1192-1199, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  16. Marshall REK, Anggiansah A, Owen WA, Owen WJ: The relationship between acid and bile reflux and symptoms in gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Gut 40:182-187, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  17. Koek GH, Tack J, Sifrim D, Lerut T, Janssens J: The role of acid and bile reflux in symptomatic gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 96:2033-2040, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cuomo R, Koek G, Sifrim D, Janssens J, Tack J: Analysis of ambulatory duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux monitoring. Dig Dis Sci, 45:2463-2469, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  19. Savary M, Miller G: L'oesophage. Manuel et Atlas d'Endoscopie. Solothurn, Verlag Gassmann, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  20. Armstrong D, Monnier Ph, Nicolet M: The “MUSE” system. In The esophageal Mucosa. R Guili, GNJ Tytgat, TR DeMeester, JP Galmiche (eds). Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, 1994, pp 313-321.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kahrilas PJ, Quigley EMM: Clinical esophageal pH recording: a technical review for practice guideline development. Gastroenterology 110:1982-1996, 1996

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tack, J., Bisschops, R., Koek, G. et al. Dietary Restrictions During Ambulatory Monitoring of Duodenogastroesophageal Reflux. Dig Dis Sci 48, 1213–1220 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024130419914

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024130419914

Navigation