Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Virus-specific CD8+ T-cell memory determined by clonal burst size

Abstract

ALTHOUGH some viruses, particularly the herpes viruses, may never be eliminated from the body1, others like influenza A, regularly reinfect humans and boost waning crossreactive CD8+ T-cell immunity2. Prolonged T-cell memory is found for viruses that are unlikely to be re-encountered and which do not persist in the host genome3–5, indicating that CD8+ T-cell memory might be independent of continued (or sporadic) antigenic exposure. A feature of virus-specific CD8+ T-cell memory is that antigen-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte precursors (CTLp) are greatly increased and remain high throughout life. The idea that persistence of the inducing antigen is essential is based on experiments in which adoptively transferred CD8+ memory T cells could not be detected for more than a few weeks in naive recipient mice without secondary challenge6, 7. Here we show that restimulation of such chimaeric mice with an inducing Sendai virus antigen increases the clonal burst size more than 7-fold within 8 days, making memory CTLp easier to detect in the longer term. We find that Sendai-virus-specific CTLp are maintained for >250 days in irradiated unin-fected recipients, including reconstituted β2-microglobulin-/-mice. To determine whether a source of viral peptide can persist after primary infection, we gave Sendai-virus-specific Thyl.l+memory spleen cells to naive mice that had been minimally depleted of Thy 1.2+ T cells, or to comparable recipients that had recovered from infection with Sendai virus or influenza virus. Although antibody against Sendai virus was never found in the naive recipients, Sendai-virus-specific CD8+ memory T cells were maintained equally well in each case for >100 days after cell transfer. We find no evidence for persisting depots of viral protein that might feed into the endogenous processing pathway and maintain viruspecific CD8+ T-cell memory.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moss, D. J., Burrows, S. R., Khanna, R., Misko, I. S. & Sculley, T. B. Semin. Immun. 4, 97–104 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McMichael, A. J., Gotch, F. M., Dongworth, D. W., Clark, A. & Potter, C. W. Lancet 2, 762–764 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Doherty, P. C., Allan, W., Eichelberger, M. & Carding, S. R. A. Rev. Immun. 10, 123–151 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Doherty, P. C., Tripp, R., Sarawar, S. R. & Hou, S. in Strategies in Vaccine Design (ed. Ada, G. L.) 51–67 (Landes Biomedical, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Demkowicz, W. E. Jr & Ennis, F. A. J. Virol. 67, 1538–1544 (1993).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gray, D. & Matzinger, P. J. exp. Med. 174, 969–974 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Oehen, S., Waldner, H., Kündig, T. M., Hengartner, H. & Zinkernagel, R. M. J. exp. Med. 176, 1273–1281 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hou, S. & Doherty, P. C. J. Immun. 150, 5494–5500 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gray, D. A. Rev. Immun. 11, 49–77 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Burton, G. F., Conrad, D. H., Szakal, A. K. & Tew, J. G. J. Immun. 150, 31–38 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zijlstra, M. et al. Nature 344, 742–746 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hou, S., Doherty, P. C., Zijlstra, M., Jaenisch, R. & Katz, J. M. J. Immun. 149, 1319–1325 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kast, W. M. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 2283–2287 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith, G. L., Levin, J. Z., Palese, P. & Moss, B. Virology 160, 336–345 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chakrabarti, S., Brechling, K. & Moss, B. Molec. cell. Biol. 5, 3403–3409 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Doherty, P. C., Korngold, R., Schwartz, D. H. & Bennink, J. R. Immun. Rev. 58, 37–72 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rocha, B., Dautigny, N. & Pereira, P. Eur. J. Immun. 19, 905–911 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. King, C. C., de Fries, R., Kolhekar, S. R. & Ahmed, R. J. Virol. 64, 5611–5616 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Doherty, P. C., Allan, J. E. & Allan, W. Immunology 66, 631–633 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lau, L. L., Jamieson, B. D., Somasundaram, T. & Ahmed, R. Nature, this issue.

  21. Mullbacher, A. J. exp. Med. 179, 317–321 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Beverley, P. C. Immun. Today 11, 203–205 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Doherty, P. C., Ceredig, R. & Allan, J. E. Clin. Immun. Immunopath. 47, 19–26 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fraser, J. D., Flavell, R. A. & Strominger, J. L. Immunogenetics 26, 31–35 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fink, P. J., Shimonkevitz, R. P. & Bevan, M. J. A. Rev. Immun. 6, 115–137 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mackay, C.R. Adv. Immun. 53, 217–265 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sprent, J. Curr. Opin. Immun. 5, 433–438 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sedgwick, J. D. & Holt, P. G. J. immun. Meth. 87, 37–44 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hou, S., Hyland, L., Ryan, K. et al. Virus-specific CD8+ T-cell memory determined by clonal burst size. Nature 369, 652–654 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/369652a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/369652a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing