Low-cost disposable endoscope: pros and cons

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Keith Obstein and collaborators from the Vanderbilt University, United States, have designed and developed a low-cost $ 35 disposable endoscope [1]. This endoscope uses a joystick-like driving mechanism which controls the endoscope tip. Their team proved its feasibility in examining the esophagus and the stomach of an ex-vivo phantom model. Unexperienced users had similar performance using a conventional scope and the new disposable scope and favor the later.

Conventional endoscopes have high acquisition costs –  20,000 to $ 40,000 for an upper endoscopy or colonoscopy tube and around $ 80,000 to $ 120,000 for a complete two-tube working system to explore both the upper and the lower gastrointestinal tract. Costs for an additional endoscopic ultrasound system are in the range of $ 200,000.

Use of conventional scopes requires higher levels of continuous training and skills, both for physicians and endoscopy nurses, especially for therapeutic procedures. The American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) training recommendations and competence evaluation include both quantitative and detailed qualitative examination criteria [2].

The workload, costs. and staff hazards associated with reprocessing conventional endoscopes are significant, and costs range between $ 140 and $ 280 per endoscope [3] [4]. Non-adherence to endoscope reprocessing guidelines together with failure to perform periodic maintenance and auditing may lead to cross-contamination [3]. In light of these disadvantages, there are potential advantages of using disposable endoscopes ([Table 1]). Available single-use disposable scopes are listed presented in [Table 2] [5] [6].

The PrimeSight TNE-500 esophagoscope was discontinued in April 2018, the day that the Cogentix company was acquired by Laborie company [7]. This was not a disposable scope, but was only covered by a single-use plastic sheet (EndoSteath). A sheet version with a working channel for biopsy capability was also available. Several clinical studies were published using this esophagoscope, mainly for Barrett esophagus screening and surveillance. The cost of one EndoSheath was around $ 40.

E.G. II is a South Korean disposable $ 100 scope with the capability of examining the esophagus and partly the stomach and duodenum. There is no working channel with biopsy capability. The device is commercially available.

Ambu company, the Danish manufacturer of disposable ear, nose and throat scopes and bronchoscopes, projected the launch of disposable upper and lower gastrointestinal scopes by 2020 [8]. The current price for one disposable bronchoscope is $ 350. Disposable robotics colonoscopy systems are listed in [Table 3].

Available human studies were done on approximately 100 patients before the year 2013 and no other data have become available since [9] [10] [11]. There are no published data on their use outside their initial development centers.

Cecal intubation rates for Aer-O-Scope, Endotics System and Invendoscope were 98.2 %, 93.1 % and 98.4 %, respectively, and mean time to reach the cecum was 14 minutes, 51 minutes, and 15 minutes, respectively.

The Invendoscope SC210 version is available for purchase for $ 350 together with the Invendo E210 guiding system. A new version of Aer-O-Scope has been tested and is projected to be marketed in 2020.

Returning to [Table 1], one of the concerns with low-cost disposable scopes may be plastic pollution. This may be an issue for the future as it recently has been shown that plastic microparticles may be traced in stools of humans around the globe [12]. EU has recently tackled this issue and banned single-use plastics [13].

A disruptive technology could change the face of endoscopy as we know it. Low-cost video-capsules or nanorobots with possibility of biopsy, tagging, and therapy may appear sometime. In the meantime, our core business is endoscopy and we should strive to improve it, maybe by transitioning to single-use instruments. For the moment, there is no way to predict the future of endoscopy, but it certainly is exciting.

• References

• 1 Garbin N, Dennis S, Ryan H. et al. Evaluation of a novel low-cost disposable endoscope for visual assessment of the esophagus and stomach in an ex-vivo phantom model. Endoscop Int Open 2019; 07: E1175-E1183
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Fried GM, Marks JM, Mellinger JD. et al. ASGE's assessment of competency in endoscopy evaluation tools for colonoscopy and EGD. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 366-367
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Beilenhoff U, Biering H, Blum R. et al. Reprocessing of flexible endoscopes and endoscopic accessories used in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Position Statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) – Update 2018. Endoscopy 2018; 50
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Ofstead CL, Quick MR, Eiland JE. et al. A glimpse at the true cost of reprocessing endoscopces: results of a pilot project. Available at: https://www.bostonscientific.com/content/dam/bostonscientific/uro-wh/portfolio-group/LithoVue/pdfs/Sterilization-Resource-Handout.pdf
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Crews NR, Gorospe EC, Johnson ML. et al. Comparative quality assessment of esophageal examination with transnasal and sedated endoscopy. Endosc Int Open 2017; 05: E340-E344
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Kang D, Lim CH, Choi MG. et al. An operable, portable, and disposable ultrathin endoscope for evaluation of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Dig Dis Sci 2019; DOI: 10.1007/s10620-019-5478-0.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 PrimeSight customer advisory. Cogentix Medical. Available at: https://www.cogentixmedical.com/discontinued-primesight-products?hsCtaTracking=bf37285b-dd34-4774-a178-5a75581ca7fb%7C341c2ece-e577-4c69-bf9f-7d1e33d3d424
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 The future of endoscopy starts now - sterile single-use endoscopy. Ambu Inc. Available at: https://www.ambu.com/Files/Files/Ambu/Investor/News/English/2018/The_Future_of_Endoscopy_(screen_view).pdf
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Gluck N, Melhem A, Halpern Z. et al. A novel self-propelled disposable colonoscope is effective for colonoscopy in humans (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 998-1004.e1
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Tumino E, Parisi G, Bertoni M. et al. Use of robotic colonoscopy in patients with previous incomplete colonoscopy. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2017; 21: 819-826
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Groth S, Rex DK, Rösch T. et al. High cecal intubation rates with a new computer-assisted colonoscope: a feasibility study. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 1075-1080
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Schwabl P, Leibmann BKöppel S. et al. Assessment of microplastic concentrations in human stool. Available at: http://www.umweltbundesamt.at/fileadmin/site/presse/news_2018/UEG_Week_2018_-_Philipp_Schwabl_Microplastics_Web.pdf
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 European Commission. European parliament votes for single-use plastics ban. Environ Euro; 2019 Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/efe/content/european-parliament-votes-single-use-plastics-ban_en
  PubMedGoogle Scholar