Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Background and study aims: A second-generation capsule endoscopy system, using the PillCam Colon 2, was developed to increase sensitivity for colorectal polyp detection compared with the first-generation system. The performance of this new system is reported.

Patients and methods: In a five-center feasibility study, second-generation capsule endoscopy was prospectively compared with conventional colonoscopy as gold standard for the detection of colorectal polyps and other colonic disease, in a cohort of patients scheduled for colonoscopy and having known or suspected colonic disease. Colonoscopy was independently performed within 10 hours after capsule ingestion. Capsule-positive but colonoscopy-negative cases were counted as false-positive.

Results: 104 patients (mean age 49.8 years) were enrolled; data from 98 were analyzed. Patient rate for polyps of any size was 44 %, 53 % of these patients having adenomas. No adverse events related to either procedure were reported. The capsule sensitivity for the detection of patients with polyps ≥ 6 mm was 89 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 70 – 97) and for those with polyps ≥ 10 mm it was 88 % (95 %CI 56 – 98), with specificities of 76 % (95 %CI 72 – 78) and 89 % (95 %CI 86 – 90), respectively. Both polyps missed by colonoscopy and mismatch in polyp size by study definition lowered specificity. Overall colon cleanliness for capsule endoscopy was adequate in 78 % of patients (95 %CI 68 – 86).

Conclusions: The new second-generation colon capsule endoscopy is a safe and effective method for visualizing the colon and detecting colonic lesions. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting colorectal polyps appear to be very good, suggesting a potential for improved accuracy compared with the first-generation system. Further prospective and comparative studies are needed.

References

• 1 Levin B, Lieberman D A, McFarland B. et al . Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American College of Radiology.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 1570-1595
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Ponchon T. Colon tumors and colonoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 992-997
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Eliakim R, Fireman Z, Gralneck I M. et al . Evaluation of the Pillcam colon capsule in the detection of colonic pathology: results of the first multicenter prospective, comparative study.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 963-970
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Schoofs N, Deviere J, Van Possum A. Pillcam colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy for colorectal diagnosis: a prospective pilot study.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 971-977
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Van Gossum A, Navas M M, Fernandez-Urien I. et al . Capsule endoscopy versus colonoscopy for the detection of polyps and cancer.  New England J Med. 2009;  361 264-270
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Chiu H M, JT W ang, Lee Y C, Wu M S. The impact of colon preparation timing on colonoscopic detection of colorectal neoplasms – a prospective endoscopist-blinded randomized trial.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 2719-2725
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Ben Horin S, Bar-Meir S, Avidan B. The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists’ recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;  102 2680-2685
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

R. EliakimMD 

Department of Gastroenterology
Rambam Health Care Campus

Bat Galim, Haifa, 91630
Israel

Fax: 972-4-8543058

Email: r_eliakim@rambam.health.gov.il