Clinical Impact of Endoscopic Ultrasonography at a County Hospital

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Background and Study Aims: Although endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a well-described examination method, there have been few reports concerning its clinical impact. The aim of this study was to describe EUS as it is performed at a county hospital, with an emphasis on the indications and clinical outcome.
Patients and Methods: Patients examined using EUS between December 1997 and November 2000 were recorded prospectively. Follow-up was conducted by examining each patient's medical records at least 3 months after the investigation. The EUS findings were compared with the patient's final diagnosis, and the decisions made by the referring department on the basis of each investigation were recorded.
Results: A total of 344 EUS procedures were performed. In the third year, the distribution of patients relative to the various referral diagnoses was: 78 with suspected benign pancreaticobiliary disease, 33 for staging of known upper gastrointestinal tract malignancy, 15 with suspected mediastinal disease or for staging of lung cancer, 13 with suspected submucosal lesions, and five with unclassified disease. Follow-up was possible in 340 patients (99 %). Compared to the final diagnosis in each patient, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates of EUS were 86 %, 90 %, and 88 %, respectively. The EUS findings made more invasive procedures unnecessary in 199 patients (58 %). EUS led to a switch to less invasive procedures in 61 patients (18 %), and it had no influence on the further management strategy in 80 patients (24 %).
Conclusions: EUS has a high level of accuracy and a substantial clinical impact when performed in an unselected population. The estimated numbers of investigations needed appear to justify setting up an EUS center at institutions with a catchment population of 350 000 inhabitants.

References

• 1 Caletti C, Fusaroli P. Endoscopic ultrasonography.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 158-166
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Lambert R, Caletti C, Cho E. et al . International workshop on the clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound in gastroenterology.  Endoscopy. 2000;  23 549-573
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Allescher H D, Rösch T, Willkomm G. et al . Performance, patient acceptance, appropriateness of indications and potential influence of EUS: a prospective study in 397 consecutive cases.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 737-745
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Jafri I H, Saltzman J R, Colby J M. et al . Evaluation of the clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasonography in gastrointestinal disease.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 367-370
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Nickl N J, Bhutani M S, Catalano M. et al . Clinical implications of endoscopic ultrasound: the American Endoscopy Club study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 371-377
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Canto M F, Chak A, Stellato T. et al . Endoscopic ultrasonography versus cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 439-448
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Materne R, van Beers B E, Gigot J F. et al . Extrahepatic biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance imaging compared with endoscopic ultrasonography.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 3-9
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Buscail L, Escourrou J, Moreau J. et al . Endoscopic ultrasonography in chronic pancreatitis: a comparative prospective study with conventional ultrasonography, computed tomography, and ERCP.  Pancreas. 1995;  10 251-257
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Catalano M F, Lahoti S, Geenen J E. et al . Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography, endoscopic retrograde pancreatography, and secretin test in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 11-17
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Fockens P, van den Brande J H, van Dullemen H M. et al . Endosonographic T-staging of esophageal carcinoma: a learning curve.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 58-62
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Schlick T, Heintz A, Junginger T. The examiner's learning effect and its influence on the quality of endoscopic ultrasonography in carcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia.  Surg Endosc. 1999;  13 894-898
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Mortensen M B, Ainsworth A P, Langkilde L K. et al . Cost-effectiveness of different diagnostic strategies in patients with nonresectable upper gastrointestinal tract malignancies.  Surg Endosc. 2000;  14 278-281
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Sahai A V, Mauldin P D, Marsi V. et al . Bile duct stones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a decision analysis to assess the roles of intraoperative cholangiography, EUS, and ERCP.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 334-343
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Brand B, Pfaff T, Binmoeller K F. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound for differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic lesions, confirmed by surgery.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;  35 1221-1228
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Mortensen M B, Pless T, Durup J. et al . Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract malignancies.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 478-483
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar

A. P. Ainsworth, M.D.

Dept. of Surgery · Vejle Hospital

7100 Vejle · Denmark ·

Fax: + 45-79-40 68 70

Email: alan.ainsworth@dadlnet.dk