Endoscopy 2002; 34(12): 998-1003
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-35831
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in General Practice: A Belgian National Survey

P.  Eisendrath 1 , J.  Tack 2 , J.  Devière 1
  • 1 Dept. of Gastroenterology and Hepatopancreatology, Erasme University Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
  • 2 Dept. of Gastroenterology, Gasthuisberg University Hospital, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Further Information

Publication History

Submitted: 23 November 2001

Accepted after Revision: 25 July 2002

Publication Date:
02 December 2002 (online)

Background and Study Aims: The aim of the present study was to analyze the results of a prospective national survey conducted in Belgium to investigate discrepancies between general practitioners’ attitudes and the available guidelines on the management of new patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
Methods: A total of 641 general practitioners (GPs) were asked to complete a questionnaire on each consultation by a patient with suspected GERD.
Results: The study population included 2234 patients (mean age ± SD: 47.37 ± 16.23 years; 52 % aged 45 or older) consulting for the first time for GERD symptoms, without previous endoscopy. Symptoms were classified as mild, moderate, or severe in 39.5 %, 48.0 %, and 11.3 % respectively, and as typical, atypical, or ”alarm“ in 87.5 %, 16.8 %, and 10.5 % respectively. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was requested by GPs in 24.7 % of patients (553 of 2234; including 186 cases that were not justified according to the guidelines), while it should have been requested in 56.6 % (1266 of 2234) if the GPs had respected the national guidelines. Only 28.4 % of the 1171 patients aged 45 or older and 52.6 % of the 95 patients under 45 presenting with alarm symptoms had an endoscopy requested at the first visit. A stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis showed that anemia and symptom severity were the two main factors prompting the GPs to request endoscopy for these patients.
Conclusions: There are major discrepancies between GP practice and national or international guidelines for GERD diagnosis. GPs clearly underused endoscopy in patients with alarm symptoms of GERD and in older patients with a new onset of GERD symptoms. GPs are more strongly influenced by the severity of symptoms than by the type of symptoms.

References

  • 1 Kennedy T M, Jones R H, Hungin A P. et al . Irritable bowel syndrome, gastro-oesophageal reflux, and bronchial hyper-responsiveness in the general population.  Gut. 1998;  43 770-774
  • 2 Locke G R, Talley N J, Fett S L. et al . Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota.  Gastroenterology. 1997;  112 1448-1456
  • 3 Isolauri J, Laippala P. Prevalence of symptoms suggestive of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in an adult population.  Ann Med. 1995;  27 67-70
  • 4 Brown D M, Everhart J E. Cost of digestive disease in the US. In: Everhart JE, ed. Digestive disease in the US: epidemiology and impact.  Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, (US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services, NIH Publication). 1994;  55 94-1447
  • 5 Fron Frost & Sullivan Co .US Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Report No. 5867 1998
  • 6 Fron IMS Health Co .Unpublished results. London; 1998
  • 7 Carlsson R, Galmiche J P, Dent J. et al . Prognosis factors influencing relapse of oesophagitis during maintenance therapy with antisecretory drugs: a meta-analysis of long-term omeprazole trials.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997;  11 473-482
  • 8 Devière J, Bouilliez D, Melot C. et al . Is it justified to give antisecretory drugs before an endoscopy? Jury opinion.  Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 1998;  61 438-449
  • 9 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. The role of endoscopy in the management of GERD: guidelines for clinical application.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 834-835
  • 10 Genval Workshop  Group. An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management.  Gut. 1999;  44 S1-S16
  • 11 Texte du Groupe de Travail. Conférence de Consensus. Comment diagnostiquer un RGO?.  Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1999;  23 S202-S207
  • 12 Bramble M G, Suvakovic Z, Hungin A PS. Detection of upper gastrointestinal cancer in patients taking antisecretory therapy prior to gastroscopy.  Gut. 2000;  46 464-467
  • 13 Johansson K E, Ask P, Boeryd B. et al . Oesophagitis: signs of reflux and gastric acid secretion in patients with symptoms of GORD.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1986;  21 837-847
  • 14 Lagergren J, Bergström R, Lindgren A. et al . Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma.  N Engl J Med. 1999;  340 825-831
  • 15 Meining A, Driesnack U, Classen M. et al . Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in primary care: results of a survey in 2 areas of Germany.  Z Gastroenterol. 2002;  40 15-20
  • 16 Vallot T, Bruley des Varannes S, Grimaud J C. et al . Epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux: predictive factors for health care resource consumption during one year.  Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1999;  23 1139-1144

P. Eisendrath, M.D.

Service de Gastroentérologie et d’Hépatopancréatologie · Hôpital Erasme ·

808, route de Lennik · 1070 Brussels · Belgium

Fax: + 32-2-555-4967

Email: p.eisendraht@village.uunet.be

    >